|
Frizz23 (OP)
|
 |
February 06, 2012, 10:47:00 PM |
|
Simple question: Which miner to use for 7970?
At the moment I use cgminer with my 6970s.
|
Ξtherization⚡️First P2E 2016⚡️🏰💎🌈 etherization.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
portron
Member
 Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
February 06, 2012, 11:52:41 PM |
|
Diablominer currently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joshwaa
|
|
February 08, 2012, 02:51:54 AM |
|
Diablominer Currently
|
Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
|
|
|
Blackasaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2012, 08:38:27 PM |
|
I have just finished testing a few and it looks like diablominer is best
|
|
|
|
|
e21
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2012, 09:55:07 PM |
|
I have just finished testing a few and it looks like diablominer is best
I am looking into making a new rig with four of these; can anyone give some hashrates using the newest DiabloMiner? Please post clock rates, voltages too if you changed them! |
|
|
|
|
|
Joshwaa
|
|
March 02, 2012, 10:32:07 PM |
|
newest Diablominer 12.2pre drivers w bundled APP SDK. 1160GPU/1000mem 1.012v 1.5vmem 695MHash
|
Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 03, 2012, 03:39:48 AM |
|
Cgminer  Con hit 718 at 1200/1050... |
|
|
|
vmarchuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2012, 10:52:21 PM |
|
CGMiner is not better for 7xxx series. I test both Diablo and CGMiner on 7970 and 7950 and Diablo always faster.
|
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
March 03, 2012, 11:03:07 PM |
|
CGMiner is not better for 7xxx series. I test both Diablo and CGMiner on 7970 and 7950 and Diablo always faster.
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
vmarchuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2012, 12:54:24 AM
Last edit: March 04, 2012, 05:20:24 AM by vmarchuk |
|
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical.
Oops ! I not know this. Last version of CGMiner I check is several weeks old. Thank you ! edit: i download 2.3.1-2 and use -k diakgcn and still get better performance with Diablominer. Not sure why cgminer run slower for me. cgminer give me 40-50mhash less than Diablo on 7xxx series using 12.2pre |
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
March 04, 2012, 08:56:03 AM |
|
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical.
Oops ! I not know this. Last version of CGMiner I check is several weeks old. Thank you ! edit: i download 2.3.1-2 and use -k diakgcn and still get better performance with Diablominer. Not sure why cgminer run slower for me. cgminer give me 40-50mhash less than Diablo on 7xxx series using 12.2pre I said it includes the diablo kernel -k diablo |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
|
Diapolo
|
|
March 04, 2012, 08:58:00 AM |
|
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical.
Oops ! I not know this. Last version of CGMiner I check is several weeks old. Thank you ! edit: i download 2.3.1-2 and use -k diakgcn and still get better performance with Diablominer. Not sure why cgminer run slower for me. cgminer give me 40-50mhash less than Diablo on 7xxx series using 12.2pre With -k diakgcn it's important to use -v 2 as performance for -v 1 is not good, but diablo seems faster currently ... but just try it again  . Dia |
|
|
|
ShadesOfMarble
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
|
|
March 04, 2012, 09:49:52 AM |
|
cgminer + diablo kernel + v1 w256 = same performance as using diablominer (for me)
12.2pre + bundled sdk + win7 32-bit
core 1125 mhz -> 662 mh/s
|
|
|
|
vmarchuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2012, 02:11:04 PM
Last edit: March 04, 2012, 07:27:54 PM by vmarchuk |
|
With -k diakgcn it's important to use -v 2 as performance for -v 1 is not good, but diablo seems faster currently ... but just try it again . I try with -v 2 with diakgcn and maybe 5mhash faster. I not understand why so slow for me. I continue to use diablominer for now and keep look on cgminer project. Like how multi GPU support in cgminer edit: I try -k diakgcn and -k diablo and performance near 5mhash difference. I think I maybe download Polish version of cgminer. I try English version and see if faster. |
|
|
|
|
Blackasaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 06, 2012, 04:40:25 AM |
|
CGMiner is not better for 7xxx series. I test both Diablo and CGMiner on 7970 and 7950 and Diablo always faster.
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical. After testing both I still find diablo to be faster in all situations/configurations, not exactly sure why considering this^ but diablo is ahead for me. |
|
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 16, 2012, 08:30:55 PM |
|
I can hit 700 at 1175 / 1025 "Standard" cgminer 2.3.1 (poclbm and 64 worksize IIRC) |
|
|
|
|
Diapolo
|
|
March 16, 2012, 10:35:45 PM
Last edit: March 16, 2012, 10:54:01 PM by Diapolo |
|
CGMiner is not better for 7xxx series. I test both Diablo and CGMiner on 7970 and 7950 and Diablo always faster.
Current cgminer includes the diablo kernel so it should be identical. After testing both I still find diablo to be faster in all situations/configurations, not exactly sure why considering this^ but diablo is ahead for me. Did you try -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256 ? use https://github.com/Diapolo/cgminer/blob/f9114da26b95e8f8cf73fd7ca014d7af8f1689a7/diakgcn120223.clI got it from Diapolo. The above version of diakgcn kernel will be released in the next cgminer version. It works well for me. pushing 680s with 1170/685 on Win7. I made a small change, which should be a little bit faster ... if you want to try it out take this file: https://github.com/Diapolo/cgminer/blob/master/diakgcn120223.clDia |
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
March 17, 2012, 04:00:44 AM |
|
I think I maybe download Polish version of cgminer. I try English version and see if faster.
Wow I didn't know I made a Polish version of cgminer... oh yeah I didn't so I'm not sure what you're talking about. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
|
