As the info about BM is spread through several threads and hard to understand. I'm opening this thread in hopes that the matter gets resolved. Past this first post I will recuse myself so as not to bias the discussion, if there is any. (Note. This is an unmoderated thread, no post will be deleted by me)
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, a judge, or the jury.
I want to REMIND everyone that there exist 3 aspects that need to be satisfied to prove guilt.
1.Means2.Motive3.Opportunity.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means,_motive,_and_opportunityThat Bluemeanie1 is innocent until proven guilty
(the burden of proof is on he who declares, not on he who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocenceAnd the data must be beyond a reasonable doubt
Evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt is the standard of evidence required to validate a criminal conviction in most adversarial legal systems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_DoubtGoing forward, I believe that motive is what is needed to prove this case