[ANN] [BBL] BitBlock-World's first X15 coin|Bittrex|Poloniex|Mandatory Update

[Taurenchief]

Minumum 576 000 coins pre-mined on same difficulty, be careful!!

Premined?  

Go FUD yourself!. I was here since the first momente and ONLY 300 blocks were premined.

Prove your claim about only 300 blocks premined
Heavily premine/instamined scamcoin

It's on the first page !

{
"blocks" : 334,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 4,
"hashespersec" : 61067,
"networkhashps" : 732,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}


When I opened wallet it was 300 blocks mined, Shadow_runner published the same. You can also check that on the block explorer if you look at the correct times. I'm tired of speak in this thread about premine. The premine is just 0.2% of the total.

And yes, it was a ninja launch and a lot of miners did a instamine with their CPU. For me this is more fair that a pre announcemente when only ASICs and FPGAs take all the blocks since the first minute. Here all the miners that were active on the forum could mine this coin just with a CPU for some hours.

proof of 300 block?
Suppose you are the developer, will you stop mining after launch? Who knows he rented ton of cloud mining

No pre-Ann (ninja)         check
premine                       check
no windows qt at launch check
instantmine                  check
no gpu miner at launch   check

conclusion scam coin

What's wrong you? It's forbidden now that the dev mine his own coin?

No pre-Ann (ninja)         true, perfect.
premine                       true, 0.2%, you have it on the first page.
no windows qt at launch FALSE, QT was published on the website at launch, and in mega 3 minutes after launch.
instantmine                  true, but instamined by MINERS from bitcointalk with just a CPU, totally FAIR.
no gpu miner at launch   true, just perfect. Like Bitcoin.

conclusion FUD

Ninja is prefect? Then why dont good launches use ninja? only developer who want to instantmine much will use ninja.
premine of at least 300.000 is only 0.2%? It is 300.000/2.2.000=14%
where is the qt published, i was at launch, and there were no qt launched 3 min after launch, you are lying
instantmine is fine? who is the largest instantminer? the dev?
some people have gpu miner at launch, while others dont, you cannot compare it with btc, because for btc nobody have gpu miner at launch

[1714607400]

1714607400

[1714607400]

1714607400

[1714607400]

1714607400

[1714607400]

1714607400

[1714607400]

1714607400

[TheCoinFinder]

Ninja is prefect? Then why dont good launches use ninja?

They do. Such as this one. It really depends on what your definition of a "good launch" is. If you mean 20 pools, and 100gh/s of rented mining power/FPGAs.. then no it was not a "good" launch - but it was a *FAIR* launch.

only developer who want to instantmine much will use ninja.

Prove this. Or be quiet. This is just pure ignorance. Do you have evidence of this?

premine of at least 300.000 is only 0.2%? It is 300.000/2.2.000=14%

Firstly, 500 coins x 312 blocks - is 156,000. nowhere near 300,000 so I don't know why you say that number.
Besides, premine was probably already used to pay for bounties, and who knows what to get on exchanges.

The devs have spoken about this in the thread many times. Or are you just calling them liars?

Again. Prove Your Allegation. Or just be quiet

instantmine is fine? who is the largest instantminer? the dev?

Well I had one person on my pool doing quite a bit for a while. There is also someone doing quite well now. It seems unlikely that the devs would do this (why not just increase the premine?) - also again you have no proof of this, so why are you assuming "oh it must be the dev, he has a CPU/GPU farm". Where do you get off making such claims? If you had proof, you would have posted it all over this thread. Rather than just your baseless rumours.

some people have gpu miner at launch, while others dont

Er.. NO ONE had GPU Miner from Launch. I'm pretty pretty damn sure of that.

Maybe you did?

[djm34]

Minumum 576 000 coins pre-mined on same difficulty, be careful!!

Premined?  

Go FUD yourself!. I was here since the first momente and ONLY 300 blocks were premined.

Prove your claim about only 300 blocks premined
Heavily premine/instamined scamcoin

It's on the first page !

{
"blocks" : 334,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 4,
"hashespersec" : 61067,
"networkhashps" : 732,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}


When I opened wallet it was 300 blocks mined, Shadow_runner published the same. You can also check that on the block explorer if you look at the correct times. I'm tired of speak in this thread about premine. The premine is just 0.2% of the total.

And yes, it was a ninja launch and a lot of miners did a instamine with their CPU. For me this is more fair that a pre announcemente when only ASICs and FPGAs take all the blocks since the first minute. Here all the miners that were active on the forum could mine this coin just with a CPU for some hours.

proof of 300 block?
Suppose you are the developer, will you stop mining after launch? Who knows he rented ton of cloud mining

No pre-Ann (ninja)         check
premine                       check
no windows qt at launch check
instantmine                  check
no gpu miner at launch   check

conclusion scam coin

Taurentchief sock puppet newbie                              check
don't have the guts to speak in his own name           check
want to agree with his own opinion he already gave   check
have a hobby                                                  not checked

[hero18688]

Marucoin dev?

[Mouse020]

Ninja is prefect? Then why dont good launches use ninja?

They do. Such as this one. It really depends on what your definition of a "good launch" is. If you mean 20 pools, and 100gh/s of rented mining power/FPGAs.. then no it was not a "good" launch - but it was a *FAIR* launch.

only developer who want to instantmine much will use ninja.

Prove this. Or be quiet. This is just pure ignorance. Do you have evidence of this?

premine of at least 300.000 is only 0.2%? It is 300.000/2.2.000=14%

Firstly, 500 coins x 312 blocks - is 156,000. nowhere near 300,000 so I don't know why you say that number.
Besides, premine was probably already used to pay for bounties, and who knows what to get on exchanges.

The devs have spoken about this in the thread many times. Or are you just calling them liars?

Again. Prove Your Allegation. Or just be quiet

instantmine is fine? who is the largest instantminer? the dev?

Well I had one person on my pool doing quite a bit for a while. There is also someone doing quite well now. It seems unlikely that the devs would do this (why not just increase the premine?) - also again you have no proof of this, so why are you assuming "oh it must be the dev, he has a CPU/GPU farm". Where do you get off making such claims? If you had proof, you would have posted it all over this thread. Rather than just your baseless rumours.

some people have gpu miner at launch, while others dont

Er.. NO ONE had GPU Miner from Launch. I'm pretty pretty damn sure of that.

Maybe you did?

Because join too late
All of a lot of resentment

If you find the first time
 you can mined into the first 300 blocks

See a high value.
But have No mining more BBL
I understand

[Taxidermista]

WTF is going on with Suprnova??

[Perl++]

The gpu miner bug on HD 6900 series...

[TR8888]

290 (non x) config anyone?

[Amph]

diff was low for almost 6 hours(SIX fucking HOURS, was 0.0009), it's just your fault, nothing else, this launch was fair as fuck

the only bad thing is the block reward, which is 27 now, fucked amount

[hardroad]

Difficulty  Block Amount

35.9973   52.00

[fibonacho]

My first Github resp ... based on sgminer5 pre-release (https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0)

So i guess it must be able to compile and run in linux ... works better on 14.6 driver

Made some improvements based on girino version so it should be slightly faster than the official miner

Didn't test much but with a R9 270X on 14.6 driver i got around 1.7MH/s (1100/1400)

Windows binary :
https://mega.co.nz/#!gA9HECaa!J-rBsnlNjasOYXmUgcc0_X-zPcYatb9NKUG-FPgLnYE

Source :
https://github.com/aznboy84/X15GPU

270X binary if you don't have 14.6 driver
https://mega.co.nz/#!VE9mWRCK!LnH07CU15FKEgEXaOXsh7C5YC4Ih1vwJitXiBgRSRV4

this is great thanks!  now on 2.5mh/s with 280x, big difference with 14.6 driver.

[AizenSou]

My first Github resp ... based on sgminer5 pre-release (https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0)

So i guess it must be able to compile and run in linux ... works better on 14.6 driver

Made some improvements based on girino version so it should be slightly faster than the official miner

Didn't test much but with a R9 270X on 14.6 driver i got around 1.7MH/s (1100/1400)

Windows binary :
https://mega.co.nz/#!gA9HECaa!J-rBsnlNjasOYXmUgcc0_X-zPcYatb9NKUG-FPgLnYE

Source :
https://github.com/aznboy84/X15GPU

270X binary if you don't have 14.6 driver
https://mega.co.nz/#!VE9mWRCK!LnH07CU15FKEgEXaOXsh7C5YC4Ih1vwJitXiBgRSRV4

I got this when compiling in Linux:
sgminer-algorithm.o:(.data+0x9e0): undefined reference to `bitblock_regenhash'

Any idea?
Thanks

[TheCoinFinder]

WTF is going on with Suprnova??

I don't know, the site seems slow but up - but I'm pretty sure ocminer is aware and working on a solution.

If it's similar to Hashharder's issues - its possibly because the massive jump in hashrate owing to GPU miners is taxing the server due to the original CPU mining diff settings. Although I can't be sure.

If anyone can fix the issues though, he can, so be patient and I'm sure he will come through.

[deblue]

win32 miner doesnt work,
stack dump and closing

[ocminer]

WTF is going on with Suprnova??

I don't know, the site seems slow but up - but I'm pretty sure ocminer is aware and working on a solution.

If it's similar to Hashharder's issues - its possibly because the massive jump in hashrate owing to GPU miners is taxing the server due to the original CPU mining diff settings. Although I can't be sure.

If anyone can fix the issues though, he can, so be patient and I'm sure he will come through.

Hi !

I'm aware, and working on a solution.

Currently the problem is, people are renting Scrypt, X11 and X13 rigs and are pointing them to the pool, resulting in massive invalid shares and a DDoS-like Attack.

I'm trying to keep the stratum up, thats why the Frontend is laggy as hell, but better stratum running and frontend slow than vice versa.

As soon as the people realize that this is X15, not X11, Scrypt or X13, everything will be fine.


EDIT: Your shares and payouts are totally safe, dont worry.

[TR8888]

Help!

1 290 is fine, other 2 are only 500k ish.

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
del *.bin
Color 0A
sgminer --algorithm bitblock -o stratum+tcp://amsterdam.eu.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:6001 -u XXX.worker1 -p x -I 18 -w 512 -g 2 --no-adl

[Immix]

where there is information about what the reward for the block should be? Nowhere find, first blocks were 111 and now on 52 ...

[shai_]

Marucoin dev?

if yes... this is a bad sign
i think maru was less instamined (both by dev+miners).. by far. i can be wrong. but look at MARU now
but the instamine in this coin... bitblock party

[Taxidermista]

WTF is going on with Suprnova??

I don't know, the site seems slow but up - but I'm pretty sure ocminer is aware and working on a solution.

If it's similar to Hashharder's issues - its possibly because the massive jump in hashrate owing to GPU miners is taxing the server due to the original CPU mining diff settings. Although I can't be sure.

If anyone can fix the issues though, he can, so be patient and I'm sure he will come through.

Hi !

I'm aware, and working on a solution.

Currently the problem is, people are renting Scrypt, X11 and X13 rigs and are pointing them to the pool, resulting in massive invalid shares and a DDoS-like Attack.

I'm trying to keep the stratum up, thats why the Frontend is laggy as hell, but better stratum running and frontend slow than vice versa.

As soon as the people realize that this is X15, not X11, Scrypt or X13, everything will be fine.


EDIT: Your shares and payouts are totally safe, dont worry.

Thank you for the update. Frontend is up and fast now.

[AizenSou]

My first Github resp ... based on sgminer5 pre-release (https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0)

So i guess it must be able to compile and run in linux ... works better on 14.6 driver

Made some improvements based on girino version so it should be slightly faster than the official miner

Didn't test much but with a R9 270X on 14.6 driver i got around 1.7MH/s (1100/1400)

Windows binary :
https://mega.co.nz/#!gA9HECaa!J-rBsnlNjasOYXmUgcc0_X-zPcYatb9NKUG-FPgLnYE

Source :
https://github.com/aznboy84/X15GPU

270X binary if you don't have 14.6 driver
https://mega.co.nz/#!VE9mWRCK!LnH07CU15FKEgEXaOXsh7C5YC4Ih1vwJitXiBgRSRV4

I got this when compiling in Linux:
sgminer-algorithm.o:(.data+0x9e0): undefined reference to `bitblock_regenhash'

Any idea?
Thanks

Bump. Anyone could compile in Linux ?