Raystonn (OP)
|
|
June 25, 2014, 07:57:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
|
June 25, 2014, 08:23:56 PM |
|
would give those stubborn critics something to think about
|
|
|
|
Dragonkiller
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
|
|
June 25, 2014, 08:35:45 PM |
|
I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat
|
|
June 25, 2014, 08:51:01 PM |
|
I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past Yeah... According to the article the Winklevoss ETF is the world's first ever Bitcoin exchange traded fund and is listed on the Nasdaq. Really?
|
|
|
|
bananaControl
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Decentralize All The Things!
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:06:54 PM |
|
I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past Yeah... According to the article the Winklevoss ETF is the world's first ever Bitcoin exchange traded fund and is listed on the Nasdaq. Really? One has to wonder what else in that article is wrong
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:10:40 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
|
|
|
|
bananaControl
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Decentralize All The Things!
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:18:11 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
The article is speculating whether Nasdaq will be an actual exchange for bitcoins. But it also states that Nasdaq is already trading the Winklevoss ETF's, so.... Nasdaq, the stock exchange known for its high-tech stocks, and Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist who co-founded Netscape, could soon be squaring off in a battle to become New York’s first regulated exchange of the digital currency, sources told The Post.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:19:57 PM |
|
What is the purpose of articles where 'the author speculates something could occur based on news from 2 months ago"? I already have the information and I can do my own speculation. I don't need to speculate based on other people's speculations and create a double speculation loop.
|
|
|
|
bananaControl
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Decentralize All The Things!
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:22:50 PM |
|
I think it's called a tabloid.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:50:40 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:51:31 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:56:01 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 10:57:20 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should.
|
|
|
|
birr
|
|
June 25, 2014, 11:00:10 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should. If you won't say it I will. NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates. Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 11:02:17 PM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should. If you won't say it I will. NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates. Can you pronounce the word "democracy"? That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 26, 2014, 03:27:00 AM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should. If you won't say it I will. NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates. Can you pronounce the word "democracy"? That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new. You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources.
|
|
|
|
onlyu
|
|
June 26, 2014, 03:57:14 AM |
|
This could increase the price 10 folds if they pull it off.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 26, 2014, 04:04:29 AM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should. If you won't say it I will. NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates. Can you pronounce the word "democracy"? That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new. You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources. 4 old sources. Nothing new.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 26, 2014, 04:37:58 AM |
|
Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?
Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me. We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news. There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all. And they should be making public updates why? I didn't say that they should. If you won't say it I will. NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates. Can you pronounce the word "democracy"? That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new. You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources. 4 old sources. Nothing new. Really? What were the soures? And you, the girl who was quoting an article from FEBRUARY about a group that wanted to buy the SR coins for 15% below spot. FUCK! So do I!
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
June 26, 2014, 05:00:29 AM |
|
Should Nasdaq officials decide to go forward, they likely will move quickly — exchange officials expect to create a regulated platform for bitcoin buyers and sellers in about a year, one source said.
|
|
|
|
|