Race to launch NY’s first regulated bitcoin exchange - 6/25/2014

[Raystonn]

http://nypost.com/2014/06/25/its-david-vs-goliath-in-race-to-launch-nys-first-regulated-bitcoin-exchange/

[600watt]

http://nypost.com/2014/06/25/its-david-vs-goliath-in-race-to-launch-nys-first-regulated-bitcoin-exchange/

would give those stubborn critics something to think about 

[Dragonkiller]

I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past 

[MatTheCat]

I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past 

Yeah...

According to the article the Winklevoss ETF is the world's first ever Bitcoin exchange traded fund and is listed on the Nasdaq. Really?

[bananaControl]

I think the nypost has proved its lack of credibility in the past 

Yeah...

According to the article the Winklevoss ETF is the world's first ever Bitcoin exchange traded fund and is listed on the Nasdaq. Really?

One has to wonder what else in that article is wrong

[TERA]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

[bananaControl]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

The article is speculating whether Nasdaq will be an actual exchange for bitcoins. But it also states that Nasdaq is already trading the Winklevoss ETF's, so....

Nasdaq, the stock exchange known for its high-tech stocks, and Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist who co-founded Netscape, could soon be squaring off in a battle to become New York’s first regulated exchange of the digital currency, sources told The Post.

[TERA]

What is the purpose of articles where 'the author speculates something could occur based on news from 2 months ago"?  I already have the information and I can do my own speculation. I don't need to speculate based on other people's speculations and create a double speculation loop.

[bananaControl]

I think it's called a tabloid.

[windjc]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

[TERA]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

[windjc]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

[TERA]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

[birr]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

If you won't say it I will.  NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates.
Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?

[TERA]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

If you won't say it I will.  NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates.
Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?

That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new.

[windjc]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

If you won't say it I will.  NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates.
Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?

That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new.

You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources.

[onlyu]

This could increase the price 10 folds if they pull it off.

[TERA]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

If you won't say it I will.  NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates.
Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?

That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new.

You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources.

4 old sources. Nothing new.

[windjc]

Is there actually any new information here or are they just summarizing what occured in March-April and what the author hopes for?

Well the fact that the article says that the regulations should be out in early July is news to me.

We knew it was slightly delayed from end of June, but if thats true its great news.

There is no source for the early July target being 'news' - This is simply based on what Lawsky said in March. Since then, there has been no public information about advancements with the regulations at all.

And they should be making public updates why?

I didn't say that they should.

If you won't say it I will.  NY Dept of Financial Svces should issue updates.
Can you pronounce the word "democracy"?

That's a different topic. My point is that the reporter is representing information as if it is new when it is not new and there is no evidence of it being new.

You don't know that there isn't evidence. He sighted 4 sources.

4 old sources. Nothing new.

Really? What were the soures?

And you, the girl who was quoting an article from FEBRUARY about a group that wanted to buy the SR coins for 15% below spot.

FUCK! So do I!

[nioc]

Should Nasdaq officials decide to go forward, they likely will move quickly — exchange officials expect to create a regulated platform for bitcoin buyers and sellers in about a year, one source said.