|
Goldshredder
|
 |
November 02, 2017, 03:16:57 AM |
|
This is what we can do. We need to have a coin swap for a new block chain using the deep algo and some current popular features like masternodes and z-snark tech along with new innovations. A partner and I would be willing to chip in some deeps to make it happen.
As would I. But the age old question is, "who's coding?". It'd be a great project to pick up, with quite a few resources already available and/or partly in place, but that question is the crux of the matter. Deepcoin is cool, but without that, we can only talk. We need to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
calculatorhe
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
November 02, 2017, 04:38:14 AM |
|
when is presentation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
marada
|
|
November 13, 2017, 12:40:28 AM
Last edit: November 13, 2017, 06:36:49 PM by marada |
|
This is what we can do. We need to have a coin swap for a new block chain using the deep algo and some current popular features like masternodes and z-snark tech along with new innovations. A partner and I would be willing to chip in some deeps to make it happen.
As would I. But the age old question is, "who's coding?". It'd be a great project to pick up, with quite a few resources already available and/or partly in place, but that question is the crux of the matter. Deepcoin is cool, but without that, we can only talk. We need to do. I don't think we really need a new blockchain. Three years old blockchain is what we only have and it works all right. Resuming the development requires rather a team of programmers and first thing we need then is a proper code maintenance, including an upgrade to the current version of bitcoin software. So called "coinswap" is a very dirty trick aimed to deprive unaware investors/holders of their assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
jox
|
|
November 13, 2017, 07:03:58 PM |
|
This is what we can do. We need to have a coin swap for a new block chain using the deep algo and some current popular features like masternodes and z-snark tech along with new innovations. A partner and I would be willing to chip in some deeps to make it happen.
As would I. But the age old question is, "who's coding?". It'd be a great project to pick up, with quite a few resources already available and/or partly in place, but that question is the crux of the matter. Deepcoin is cool, but without that, we can only talk. We need to do. I don't think we really need a new blockchain. Three years old blockchain is what we only have and it works all right. Resuming the development requires rather a team of programmers and first thing we need then is a proper code maintenance, including an upgrade to the current version of bitcoin software. So called "coinswap" is a very dirty trick aimed to deprive unaware investors/holders of their assets. I totally agree. If there was any technical development here, I support it. But without active development there is nothing to support. Besides, a lot of cryptocoins that are ASIC free gained value and become popular. |
|
|
|
|
aliceaa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
January 21, 2018, 11:09:15 PM |
|
Instead of forum writing, I'm mining Deepcoin in some moments when my laptop is free. 500 DCN during the night (at really low cost) is a normal thing. The same with sister-coin of Deep - Cassubian Detk. I'm wondering why all off You don't do the same. Both coins are old and healthy, the moment they are back on exchanges - is near.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
January 27, 2018, 12:32:57 PM |
|
There has been a large resurgence in exchanges in recent months. There are quite a lot now.  We should get Deepcoin on one of the upcoming exchanges like stocks.exchange or similar. This is one of the higher ranking threads in page views in this whole altcoin subforum, relatively speaking. Did you know that? Have a look. By that metric and many others, every other project and a whole lot below us, are all listed on multiple exchanges. This needs to be rectified. They don't call it Deepcoin for nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
January 28, 2018, 07:02:42 PM |
|
Or coinexchange.io.
We need the founder or current developer to reach out.
|
|
|
|
|
CoinMenX
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
|
|
January 28, 2018, 07:09:08 PM |
|
is this anonymous coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Luizrosevelt
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 3
|
|
January 28, 2018, 07:10:31 PM |
|
Is there a walk around in this ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:11:56 PM |
|
Decentralised exchanges like BarterDEX (while still at the small volume stage, so far) are an option too.
|
|
|
|
|
benxy031
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 12
|
|
March 06, 2018, 08:27:58 PM |
|
We need a pool |
|
|
|
|
|
tortellino
|
|
March 24, 2018, 01:45:24 PM |
|
are there any nodes for syncing the wallet?
|
|
|
|
benxy031
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 12
|
|
March 24, 2018, 03:18:12 PM |
|
Try this:
88.98.87.243
144.76.64.49
85.216.152.49
|
|
|
|
|
reverendCryptoFnord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2018, 07:34:18 AM |
|
Some time ago dev talked about reviving this coin. Like two years ago. I guess no reviving I think there is no merit in renewing development. There is just nothing relevant this coin can offer. Anonymity is the only relevant thing. But now there are better technological options... Though its fascinating that the network is still alive. |
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
|
|
May 02, 2018, 10:49:25 AM |
|
Though its fascinating that the network is still alive.
What's fascinating? The fact that reality doesn't match the predictions produced by your analysis? That is a shame, I agree but atm I'm a bit busy and not in a position to adjust reality to fit your model predictions, please accept my apologies on this matter. I know it'll be a bitter blow but you just might need to face the inconvenient prospect of having to deepen your model in order for it to produce less unreliable projections. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
May 04, 2018, 06:40:49 AM |
|
Fascinating post, Graham.
<ducks thrown objects>
|
|
|
|
|
a123canz999888
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
May 05, 2018, 10:59:01 AM |
|
I think no matter how much effort would be put into explaining to you what is deeponion you would still be like that. Its good to criticize someone or something but this can all be done in a nice way no need to be calling someone uneducated words
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
May 07, 2018, 11:51:00 AM |
|
I think no matter how much effort would be put into explaining to you what is deeponion you would still be like that. Its good to criticize someone or something but this can all be done in a nice way no need to be calling someone uneducated words
That's of such massive relevance, a123canz999888, and as such, it's extreme pertinence to this thread is eminently applicable. |
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
|
|
May 07, 2018, 02:17:02 PM |
|
I think no matter how much effort would be put into explaining to you what is deeponion you would still be like that. Its good to criticize someone or something but this can all be done in a nice way no need to be calling someone uneducated words
The inclusion of the contextually irrelevant "deeponion" testifies to the above being the result of feeding sentiment analysis into a modern equivanent of a Markov chain generator. Another step along the road towards the Butlerian jihad. Cheers Graham |
|
|
|
|
YodaPL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
August 26, 2018, 08:32:08 PM |
|
Deepcoin need block explorer. Then we have a chance for DCN/BTC market on freiexchange.com( for free) Cassubian Detk from 2014 and ZERO technical development has market on that exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
