Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2017, 02:34:06 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW  (Read 173175 times)
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 03:36:21 AM
 #1001

criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread  Huh

lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1503196446
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503196446

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503196446
Reply with quote  #2

1503196446
Report to moderator
1503196446
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503196446

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503196446
Reply with quote  #2

1503196446
Report to moderator
1503196446
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503196446

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503196446
Reply with quote  #2

1503196446
Report to moderator
bigc1984
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2014, 03:46:56 AM
 #1002

The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam. Grin

So, according to your logic, DCN is a scam as Feathercoin since is the same dev.
You just want to denigrate Talkcoin. Your stupidity has no limits.
My point is that for his reputation, Bushstar should not get involed in a proved scam coin .

I am very touched by your concern about the reputation of Bushstar.  Cry
How about developping a new coin with the combination of dcn algo and a chatting system without vote?

developping? Go to sleep... you're drunk...

bigc1984
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2014, 03:50:56 AM
 #1003

criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread  Huh

lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays



yea exactly basically he is saying "deepcoin is a scam!!!.... can we relaunch?"

kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 03:57:46 AM
 #1004

criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread  Huh

lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays



yea exactly basically he is saying "deepcoin is a scam!!!.... can we relaunch?"
Exactly!



@dilution007

DeepCoin is here for months and TalkCoin as well, lol so why were you silent all this time.

You  SUDDENLY decided to create a new nickname and hide behind it AFTER not before DeepCoin price rising and fud this thread with your shit about reputation of a dev. That's telling everything.


Dude you and guys like you are retards no more, I blame you not cause it's your nature, I blame the weak hands - the real retards - that they keep falling into traps of guys like you then moaning like b******s when they lose everything.
dilution007
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 07:21:10 AM
 #1005

DCN is a clean coin,but tac is proved scam.

fnordian
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 07:42:40 AM
 #1006

Hey, dev. You are silent for more than a week. How's life?

dilution007
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 07:43:46 AM
 #1007

can personal attacks change the truth?
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.

unittester
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 09:30:44 AM
 #1008

DCN is a clean coin,but tac is proved scam.
Yeah,talkcoin dev has stolen huge amount of tac .
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 12:08:17 PM
 #1009

can personal attacks change the truth?
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.


What truth you are talking about? I wasn't talking about TalkCoin, I know nothing about TalkCoin, don't care to know anything about TalkCoin and you know I'm talking about DeepCoin, obvious from the thread's name, so quit trying to mix things on purpose. Period.


You on purpose PUSHED Bushstar's name in the middle of your comment thing then saying you are feeling worry about his reputation *so touchy* and then talking about creating a coin, lol YET as I said and as I will say again DCN and TalkCoin are here for months, you created your hide-behind-it nick just one day ago AFTER the DCN rising NOT before it, not at the time you found TalkCoin in your opinion is a scam. What truth you are talking about again??

Personal attacks? Dude for example when a thief has robbed something and I call him a thief, that's not a personal attack, it's about stating some FACTS.


Sounds like either IE himself or one of his slaves. Same style, same type of FUD.


Grow up and get a life kid.
unittester
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 12:27:20 PM
 #1010

I'll keep mining some DCN and I like the deepcoin algo,pretty low temperature.
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 12:37:36 PM
 #1011

The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam. Grin

Could you prove me that Talkcoin is a scam with your 2. grade English please?
Well the Chinese trolls are everywhere these days, all with newbie account. Sometimes I become sick just because of reading their comments.
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2014, 01:54:48 PM
 #1012

Let's clear some things up, shall we?

In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.

Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.

Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.

"If you are going through hell, keep going."

NYVCE   |   Decred Project by TacoTime   |   DeepCoin :  [ANN]   |   XwebHosting: Professional Web Hosting for BTC|LTC|NMC|PPC|DOGE|XPM|UTC   |   BTC: 13jUsnvZuhipK7bYwbSR1q9MktCbju6pc8
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 02:15:54 PM
 #1013

Let's clear some things up, shall we?

In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.

Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.

Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.

+1
I think we should be more tolerant towards these trolls concerning their limited understanding of English. They couldn't read and write well. Ignore them is the best I can think of.
Timmy95
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 02:37:04 PM
 #1014

Let's clear some things up, shall we?

In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.

Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.

Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.

+1
I think we should be more tolerant towards these trolls concerning their limited understanding of English. They couldn't read and write well. Ignore them is the best I can think of.

I do not want to look for shit, so I apologize in advance if you take something wrong, but I think having a limited understanding of English does not make you a troll.

I am French and have some trouble with some english words, but I'm far from a troll just bashing one coin or another.

Wallet DCN : DRCW2WJQHX5Tr321u49kMWCzSmksQrDrkA
Official Website: Deepcoin.biz
unittester
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 03:09:24 PM
 #1015

What's going on here?Is this Deepcoin thread or am I in the wrong place?
Nobody cares about your tac shit here,fuck off!
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 03:59:31 PM
 #1016

I'd like to discuss some results of my research on energy efficiency of deepcoin mining.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and settings are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.



My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very settings-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.

If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.
unittester
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:13:04 PM
 #1017

I'd like to discuss some results of my research on energy efficiency of deepcoin mining.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and setting are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/rj5pl1mtg3ei6zw/deep_efficiency.png?dl=0

My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very setting-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.

If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.

thanks for you data,also I found that it's quite unstale with the  maximal performance settings,sgminer crashed every day.
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:14:40 PM
 #1018

thanks for you data,also I found that it's quite unstale with the  maximal performance settings,sgminer crashed every day.

In this case, with the exception of scrypt, I took under consideration only stable settings.
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2014, 04:24:28 PM
 #1019

I'd like to discuss some results of my research on energy efficiency of deepcoin mining.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and setting are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.



My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very setting-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.

If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.

This should be made available within the OP. Quite valuable information. Thanks for the contribution!

"If you are going through hell, keep going."

NYVCE   |   Decred Project by TacoTime   |   DeepCoin :  [ANN]   |   XwebHosting: Professional Web Hosting for BTC|LTC|NMC|PPC|DOGE|XPM|UTC   |   BTC: 13jUsnvZuhipK7bYwbSR1q9MktCbju6pc8
karimdr2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:37:25 PM
 #1020

Deephash consumes slightly less than X11 and Xxx algo but I have the impression that it is more stable with my 280x GPUs.

★ BitNet ★ New Darknet, better than TOR ! FREE VPN ! Free Distribution 14,000,000 VPNCOIN!!! Vg7NuuuJt2snso5N1EMPyPwSTHb2ByiHRo
BTC: 1Gu3KYr3HV1TGJmqgSXXQbGxxdLzTEAN6o
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!