|
amarian12
|
 |
July 03, 2014, 04:12:05 PM |
|
it is what i believe first but i do have:
algo=quark (for quark pool )
and
algo=scryptn (for scryptn pool)
Both on dedicated servers
|
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
SpectrumCoin (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:19:21 PM |
|
it is what i believe first but i do have:
algo=quark (for quark pool )
and
algo=scryptn (for scryptn pool)
Both on dedicated servers
It looks like your pool is submitting the wrong block version number. From core.h // primary version
BLOCK_VERSION_DEFAULT = 2,
// modifiers
BLOCK_VERSION_AUXPOW = (1 << 8),
// algo
BLOCK_VERSION_ALGO = (15 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPT = (1 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL = (2 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SKEIN = (3 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUBIT = (4 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X11 = (5 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUARK = (6 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL2 = (7 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_BLAKE256 = (8 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X13 = (9 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPTN = (10 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_KECCAK = (11 << 9),
So for a Quark block, your pool should be using block version 2 || (6 << 9) = 2 || 3072 = 3074 |
|
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:23:59 PM |
|
it is what i believe first but i do have:
algo=quark (for quark pool )
and
algo=scryptn (for scryptn pool)
Both on dedicated servers
It looks like your pool is submitting the wrong block version number. From core.h // primary version
BLOCK_VERSION_DEFAULT = 2,
// modifiers
BLOCK_VERSION_AUXPOW = (1 << 8),
// algo
BLOCK_VERSION_ALGO = (15 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPT = (1 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL = (2 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SKEIN = (3 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUBIT = (4 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X11 = (5 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUARK = (6 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL2 = (7 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_BLAKE256 = (8 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X13 = (9 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPTN = (10 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_KECCAK = (11 << 9),
So for a Quark block, your pool should be using block version 2 || (6 << 9) = 2 || 3072 = 3074 maybe you can explain us what are the diference from Quark to Spectrumcoin .... also what are from Vertcoin to Spectrumcoin .... in this case will be more easy for us to create the best setup for pools. |
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
SpectrumCoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:30:05 PM |
|
it is what i believe first but i do have:
algo=quark (for quark pool )
and
algo=scryptn (for scryptn pool)
Both on dedicated servers
It looks like your pool is submitting the wrong block version number. From core.h // primary version
BLOCK_VERSION_DEFAULT = 2,
// modifiers
BLOCK_VERSION_AUXPOW = (1 << 8),
// algo
BLOCK_VERSION_ALGO = (15 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPT = (1 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL = (2 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SKEIN = (3 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUBIT = (4 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X11 = (5 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUARK = (6 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL2 = (7 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_BLAKE256 = (8 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X13 = (9 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPTN = (10 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_KECCAK = (11 << 9),
So for a Quark block, your pool should be using block version 2 || (6 << 9) = 2 || 3072 = 3074 maybe you can explain us what are the diference from Quark to Spectrumcoin .... also what are from Vertcoin to Spectrumcoin .... in this case will be more easy for us to create the best setup for pools. The hashing algorithms for Quark and ScyptN was taken from Quarkcoin and Vertcoin. So there is no difference in hashing (except for how the N parameter changes for ScryptN as previously mentioned). The other changes are not related to the hashing algorithm. They are similar to Myriadcoin to support multi-algorithm hashing. |
|
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:58:29 PM |
|
i did replicate the p2pool i have running for quark and for vertcoin, i did adjust the normal p2pool settings .... but i do have this problem i did find blocks but not good ones.
|
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
yongyuanbtc
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 05:20:13 PM |
|
dev SPEC there is a better flow of it? For example when it can on https://bittrex.com? |
|
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
July 03, 2014, 05:38:36 PM |
|
it is what i believe first but i do have:
algo=quark (for quark pool )
and
algo=scryptn (for scryptn pool)
Both on dedicated servers
It looks like your pool is submitting the wrong block version number. From core.h // primary version
BLOCK_VERSION_DEFAULT = 2,
// modifiers
BLOCK_VERSION_AUXPOW = (1 << 8),
// algo
BLOCK_VERSION_ALGO = (15 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPT = (1 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL = (2 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SKEIN = (3 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUBIT = (4 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X11 = (5 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_QUARK = (6 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_GROESTL2 = (7 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_BLAKE256 = (8 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_X13 = (9 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_SCRYPTN = (10 << 9),
BLOCK_VERSION_KECCAK = (11 << 9),
So for a Quark block, your pool should be using block version 2 || (6 << 9) = 2 || 3072 = 3074 maybe you can explain us what are the diference from Quark to Spectrumcoin .... also what are from Vertcoin to Spectrumcoin .... in this case will be more easy for us to create the best setup for pools. The hashing algorithms for Quark and ScyptN was taken from Quarkcoin and Vertcoin. So there is no difference in hashing (except for how the N parameter changes for ScryptN as previously mentioned). The other changes are not related to the hashing algorithm. They are similar to Myriadcoin to support multi-algorithm hashing. But using vertcoin miner (vertminer) with wallet/solo mining : only rejected blocks (not orphans, rejected in the miner directly) |
|
|
|
SpectrumCoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 11:46:40 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mig6r
|
|
July 04, 2014, 11:48:25 AM |
|
works for me without any additionnal dll... At some point people should start fixing their OS  +1 |
|
|
|
SpectrumCoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 11:54:17 AM |
|
Requested at bittrex and poloniex. Please help by requesting SpectrumCoin from your favourite exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
jox
|
|
July 04, 2014, 12:11:12 PM |
|
Is there Spectrumcoin tweeter account?
|
|
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
July 04, 2014, 07:44:02 PM |
|
need help, on both quark and scryptn i get this type of errors: ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
received block c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Warning: Local node 127.0.0.1:40901 misbehaving (delta: 50)!
received block c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Warning: Local node 127.0.0.1:40901 misbehaving (delta: 50)!
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058385
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058492 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058543
2014-07-04 18:30:31.062000 GOT SHARE! SWadduPrZ4f7gGd52LetUKBzTfcM7tzdxC 6912ad68 prev 4b564daf age 192.16s
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064702
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064799 GOT BLOCK FROM PEER! Passing to bitcoind! 6912ad68 bitcoin: c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064860
2014-07-04 18:30:31.070246 New work for worker! Difficulty: 0.007324 Share difficulty: 0.007324 Total block value: 100.000000 SPEC including 1 transactions
2014-07-04 18:30:31.080283 > Block submittal result: False (u'rejected') Expected: True
this is for scryptn ( I did replicate vercoin p2pool setup) i will come also with logs for quark part (when i do have free time to replicate the errors) |
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
SpectrumCoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 08:03:58 PM |
|
need help, on both quark and scryptn i get this type of errors: ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
received block c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Warning: Local node 127.0.0.1:40901 misbehaving (delta: 50)!
received block c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork(algo=10) : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Warning: Local node 127.0.0.1:40901 misbehaving (delta: 50)!
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058385
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058492 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
2014-07-04 18:30:31.058543
2014-07-04 18:30:31.062000 GOT SHARE! SWadduPrZ4f7gGd52LetUKBzTfcM7tzdxC 6912ad68 prev 4b564daf age 192.16s
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064702
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064799 GOT BLOCK FROM PEER! Passing to bitcoind! 6912ad68 bitcoin: c80507ab31ddeb47fea5f30133cbc02580a8bb7442bcd92c4a4f8a636912ad68
2014-07-04 18:30:31.064860
2014-07-04 18:30:31.070246 New work for worker! Difficulty: 0.007324 Share difficulty: 0.007324 Total block value: 100.000000 SPEC including 1 transactions
2014-07-04 18:30:31.080283 > Block submittal result: False (u'rejected') Expected: True
this is for scryptn ( I did replicate vercoin p2pool setup) i will come also with logs for quark part (when i do have free time to replicate the errors) Looks like the daemon now checks the correct algo (10), but the daemon rejects the block because the difficulty of the block is not high enough. Which miner are you using? |
|
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
July 04, 2014, 08:15:06 PM |
|
Looks like the daemon now checks the correct algo (10), but the daemon rejects the block because the difficulty of the block is not high enough.
Which miner are you using?
vertminer (GPU vertcoin miner) |
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:56:34 PM |
|
Looks like the daemon now checks the correct algo (10), but the daemon rejects the block because the difficulty of the block is not high enough.
Which miner are you using?
vertminer (GPU vertcoin miner) I used it too to try solo mining, and all blocks are rejected! tested with 0.5.2 and 0.5.4 |
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:00:42 PM |
|
Looks like the daemon now checks the correct algo (10), but the daemon rejects the block because the difficulty of the block is not high enough.
Which miner are you using?
vertminer (GPU vertcoin miner) I used it too to try solo mining, and all blocks are rejected! tested with 0.5.2 and 0.5.4 Dev say the N is different ... now i try to check both source codes ( coin + miner) and discover if the N is somewhere in code locked (as Vercoin start from 10 till 30 ) i am really lost for now with it.. |
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
July 05, 2014, 09:55:34 AM |
|
Looks like the daemon now checks the correct algo (10), but the daemon rejects the block because the difficulty of the block is not high enough.
Which miner are you using?
vertminer (GPU vertcoin miner) I used it too to try solo mining, and all blocks are rejected! tested with 0.5.2 and 0.5.4 Dev say the N is different ... now i try to check both source codes ( coin + miner) and discover if the N is somewhere in code locked (as Vercoin start from 10 till 30 ) i am really lost for now with it.. I tried with N=10 , 11 and 12. Same results, blocks are rejected. |
|
|
|
vedran82
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
July 05, 2014, 11:24:25 AM |
|
Cudaminer works great on scrypt-N. I can't say I'm not satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coolisbad
|
|
July 05, 2014, 11:45:36 AM |
|
Cudaminer works great on scrypt-N. I can't say I'm not satisfied.
What version of cudaminer? And what parameters? |
|
|
|
|
vedran82
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
July 05, 2014, 11:52:40 AM |
|
28.02. version, nfactor 12 (2^12, 4096).
|
|
|
|
|
|
