aznboy84 (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2014, 07:04:10 AM Last edit: July 09, 2014, 02:12:38 PM by aznboy84 |
|
Just realized that i might need a thread for my sgminer build for further support, so here goes ...
Optimized x11, x13, x14 and new x15 kernel
There also a "bitblockold" and "x14old" kernel working with older GPUs (78xx, 68xx ...)
Expecting X15 hash rate on 14.6 driver :
270X : 1.85MH/s (1100/1400 engine/mem) 7950 : 2.4MH/s (1050/1250 engine/mem) (mine was undervoltage / can't push engine clock) 280X : 2.9MH/s (1100/1400 engine/mem)
Github source : https://github.com/aznboy84/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 https://github.com/aznboy84/freshgpu (freshcoin version )
Win32 binary : X15_AMD_06_30.rar X15_AMD_06_29.rar FRESHCOIN SGMINER
there's 3 batch file for 7950, 270x and 280x and 3 pre-built binary kernel if you don't want to upgrade to 14.6, but hash rate would be 5% slower compared to 14.6 driver, just edit your pool, worker, password and run
There might be 2 "gpu-platform" on driver 14.6 (no idea why) so if your miner exit immediately after run just try --gpu-platform (0 or 1) then it should work
How to make your own windows build
some help on linux (BAMT, PIMP) build (don't have any exprience on BAMT or PIMP, after complied the rest is up to you ) Fresh build instructionscd /opt git clone https://github.com/aznboy84/freshgpu.gitcd freshgpu cp -av /opt/ADL-SDK/*.h ./ADL_SDK/ git submodule update --init --recursive sh autogen.sh CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure make UPDATE 1 : Removing SPH_LUFFA_PARALLEL (Win32 binary rebuild too) guess someone getting few HW because of that UPDATE 2 : Added X14 support into github source, but don't think you gonna need it because hash rate was about the same as the other miner (same code lol) There also a x14old kernel if you wanna try
|
|
|
|
havikk
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 29, 2014, 07:36:58 AM |
|
Great work!
Did you have any luck in resolving the issue with using both bitblock & bitblockold kernels at the same time?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
mammix2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
|
|
June 29, 2014, 07:40:10 AM |
|
good work aznboy84, keep updating it and this could be 'The Place to go' for X15 mining information
|
1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
June 29, 2014, 08:26:35 AM |
|
What's up dude, chiming in here since I'm usually over in the sgminer_5 multi-algo thread.
Your optimizations are pretty killer, pulling 3.6MH on a 290X.
It should be noted though I think that SPH_LUFFA_PARALLEL 1 is a killer for some cards that tend to go SICK, so people should maybe throttle back their overclocks.
I tried this version as is, with OC 1040/1300 and it threw a [questionable] card into SICK within 15 minutes, temps dropped on it to 40C and it basically just choked on a thread. Scaled that card back to 1010/1250 [290X] and the uptime seems to be holding.
As you don't have any 290/X to test personally on, I'll definitely help wherever I can. And I really like that you are releasing Windows binaries at the same time if not before the Linux compiles. It was always a bitch and a half to wait for one of the few Windows compiling people to wake up and have the time to do that.
Very much fucking appreciated. And I've backed you elsewhere in multiple threads already, as you may have seen dude.
Thanks sincerely for your contributions to the mining space so far.
Of course, if you have any more pull requests for sgminer v5_0 tree, please do not hesitate, ystarnaud has a shitload of commits going on over there as well; hopefully we can stay away from divergent forks, but whatever works right?
|
|
|
|
divo2014
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 29, 2014, 09:19:32 AM |
|
very good job!!!! Badly that in conf it is impossible to specify bitblock,bitblockold,chtoby at once simultaneously worked I am sorry for bad English
|
|
|
|
aznboy84 (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2014, 09:26:58 AM |
|
@divo2014, @havikk : i find out it's kidda hard to get multiple kernel into a pool configuration on this version, just threw away my 2 hours on that and still at nowhere @platinum4 : SPH_LUFFA_PARALLEL 1 doesn't increase hash rate much so i guess just gonna remove it (copied from my x11 + x13 optimized )
|
|
|
|
divo2014
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 29, 2014, 09:36:34 AM |
|
x11 + x13 optimized -very good job!!!! +5%
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
First account stolen, in traditional BCT fashion!
|
|
June 29, 2014, 10:08:06 AM |
|
We need to be able to use bitblockold and bitblock at the same time... many people have old + new cards in the same rig.
Trying to bypass it by ignoring the old card(s) always results in a freeze too, doh.
|
|
|
|
bullus
|
|
June 29, 2014, 10:15:04 AM |
|
We need to be able to use bitblockold and bitblock at the same time... many people have old + new cards in the same rig.
Trying to bypass it by ignoring the old card(s) always results in a freeze too, doh.
The problem lies in the v5 version from the beginning it is not supported. So I had to get rid of my 6970 because of the many problems I had. Now running with only 7950. U can run it but u need 2 seperate sgminers to run with "remove-disabled" : true, and "device" option.
|
btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
|
|
|
diks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1450
|
|
June 29, 2014, 10:30:33 AM |
|
I have nvidia and old amd R7 X11 amd + ~ 15-18% Thanks!
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 29, 2014, 10:34:16 AM |
|
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1110: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1116: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^ whats this ?
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
aznboy84 (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2014, 10:43:16 AM |
|
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1110: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1116: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^ whats this ?
Lol there was a mistake when i switch to the correct branch on github re-download /kernel/bitblock.cl or just add #define SPH_HAMSI_SHORT 1 at line 81
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:03:32 AM |
|
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1110: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^
"/tmp/OCLgJOw7A.cl", line 1116: error: identifier "INPUT_BIG_LOCAL" is undefined INPUT_BIG_LOCAL; ^ whats this ?
Lol there was a mistake when i switch to the correct branch on github re-download /kernel/bitblock.cl or just add #define SPH_HAMSI_SHORT 1 at line 81 I got this error when I tried to drop the newest bitblock.cl from 6/28 into a miner built on 6/25, which ran the original bitblock.cl It was a very specific case, and I haven't experienced it with the 6/29 edition. @aznboy84 I'm not sure if it's the LUFFA PARALLEL or not, but i have rigs up now for ~75 minutes after the last SICK/DEAD encountered. Comparing to other sgminers this version knocked out 3 separate cards I haven't problems with before. So something is especially aggressive. The hard-coded hamsi_expand_big 1 shouldn't affect it since I'm on 290X
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:06:12 AM |
|
What are the optimized starting parameters for 280x under linux ?
I'm getting around 1.000 MH/s and after 5 mins all cards are sick/dead with -I 18, -g 2 and worksize 256 (1100/1400)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:16:42 AM |
|
how much is the consumption with one 280x, hashing x15?
|
|
|
|
aznboy84 (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:17:20 AM |
|
What are the optimized starting parameters for 280x under linux ?
I'm getting around 1.000 MH/s and after 5 mins all cards are sick/dead with -I 18, -g 2 and worksize 256 (1100/1400)
They was running on default SHA256 algo i guess BTW here goes the config { "pools": [ { "name": "MAIA", "url": "stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:6002", "user": "xxx.1", "pass": "x", "algorithm": "bitblock" } ], "failover-only": true, "algorithm": "bitblock", "devices": "all", "intensity": "19", "worksize": "64", "gpu-engine": "1100", "gpu-memclock": "1250", "gpu-threads": "2", "gpu-fan": "50", "gpu-powertune": "20", "temp-cutoff": "95,95,95", "temp-overheat": "85,85,85", "temp-target": "75,75,75", "gpu-memdiff": "0,0,0", "shares": "0", "api-mcast-port": "4028", "api-port": "4028", "expiry": "28", "failover-switch-delay": "60", "gpu-dyninterval": "7", "log": "5", "no-pool-disable": true, "no-client-reconnect": true, "queue": "1", "scan-time": "7", "tcp-keepalive": "30", "temp-hysteresis": "3" }
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:33:32 AM |
|
had you made any changes to x13modold? On 5850 I'm getting higher hashrates using your miner on x15, than with lasybear miner on x13 :S With your version now 5850@stock makes almost 1MH/s, up from 850-860, I have to check x11 also PS: x11 is unchanged, tho for some reason -I parameter, or intensity in conf file is ignored, always starting with I=12 :S
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
First account stolen, in traditional BCT fashion!
|
|
June 29, 2014, 11:46:12 AM |
|
The problem lies in the v5 version from the beginning it is not supported. So I had to get rid of my 6970 because of the many problems I had. Now running with only 7950. U can run it but u need 2 seperate sgminers to run with "remove-disabled" : true, and "device" option.
Thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
June 29, 2014, 12:53:34 PM |
|
What are the optimized starting parameters for 280x under linux ?
I'm getting around 1.000 MH/s and after 5 mins all cards are sick/dead with -I 18, -g 2 and worksize 256 (1100/1400)
Right? Aggressive as all hell huh.
|
|
|
|
bullus
|
|
June 29, 2014, 01:28:34 PM |
|
Running it stable for 14hours now, but using the 06252014 version..didn't test this version yet. 4x7950@1035/1500 @2110kh/s
|
btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
|
|
|
|