Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 07:10:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CFD trading issue  (Read 1012 times)
slothbag (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 09:46:32 AM
 #1

I have been thinking about how to set up a CFD trading project but have a problem someone might know a solution to.

Lets say trader A wants to go long on AAPL shares for 1000 shares @ $500usd, and trader B agrees to go short AAPL for 400 shares @ $500usd.  A position is matched and created for both traders for 400 shares @ $500.

AAPL goes up in price to $600usd a share.

If trader B wants to liquidate his loss there shouldn't be a problem because trader A will happily take the profit.  However what if trader A wants to liquidate which forces trader B to "realize" the loss.  In a market with high liquidity a potential buyer of trader A's long position could be found to take its position. However in a low liquidity market there probably wont be anyone to assume trader A's long position and after trader B "realizing" the loss there may be no one to take up a new matching position with trader B for him to recoup his losses on any downward swing.

What about if the profiting trader wants to liquidate he only gets 50% of the profit, so that the loosing trader only realizes half the loss? Still pretty shitty for the loosing trader.

Or is it a known risk in a low liquidity market that you may not be able to liquidate easily?

Thoughts?
1715454650
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715454650

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715454650
Reply with quote  #2

1715454650
Report to moderator
1715454650
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715454650

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715454650
Reply with quote  #2

1715454650
Report to moderator
1715454650
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715454650

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715454650
Reply with quote  #2

1715454650
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715454650
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715454650

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715454650
Reply with quote  #2

1715454650
Report to moderator
1715454650
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715454650

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715454650
Reply with quote  #2

1715454650
Report to moderator
slothbag (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 11:54:05 AM
 #2

The only solution I can see is if trader A wants to force liquidate, he has to cancel the order and both trader A and trader B walk away with no money made or lost except for maybe a small fee/penalty.
copumpkin
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 252


I'm actually a pineapple


View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:29:48 PM
 #3

I have been thinking about how to set up a CFD trading project but have a problem someone might know a solution to.

Lets say trader A wants to go long on AAPL shares for 1000 shares @ $500usd, and trader B agrees to go short AAPL for 400 shares @ $500usd.  A position is matched and created for both traders for 400 shares @ $500.

AAPL goes up in price to $600usd a share.

If trader B wants to liquidate his loss there shouldn't be a problem because trader A will happily take the profit.  However what if trader A wants to liquidate which forces trader B to "realize" the loss.  In a market with high liquidity a potential buyer of trader A's long position could be found to take its position. However in a low liquidity market there probably wont be anyone to assume trader A's long position and after trader B "realizing" the loss there may be no one to take up a new matching position with trader B for him to recoup his losses on any downward swing.

What about if the profiting trader wants to liquidate he only gets 50% of the profit, so that the loosing trader only realizes half the loss? Still pretty shitty for the loosing trader.

Or is it a known risk in a low liquidity market that you may not be able to liquidate easily?

Thoughts?

It is a known risk Smiley but either way, if you implement something like daily settlement with a margin account, the potential losses from one of the counterparties getting cold feet are much more limited.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!