[ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal

[djm34]

My be after 30-60days?

Doesn't sound like the best way to ask someone to release something  (just saying...)

[teamcryptonator]

Hey guys!

We have just added WhirlCoin to Cryptonator so now you can use all its free features

• Convert it to any other crypto or fiat using converter
• Check progress with Winners & Losers
• Track value of all owned coins using Portfolio
• Find Exchanges  which trades WHRL
• Place fully customizable price tickers on your website

Should you own an iPhone or an Android device, we also have all these in our free mobile apps for iOS / Android

Cheers

[farsight]

who can give a 7850 bat file. my 7850 can only run at 1.1M /s

[uray]

as promised, new AMD miner is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707708

[jarvis]

Temps and speed very nice!!!!!!   Thank you!!!!!

[jarvis]

These are my 280x after 8 minutes of running.   Still great temps.

[uray]

These are my 280x after 8 minutes of running.   Still great temps.

well cool temperature means, there is still a lot of room for improvement

[djm34]

as promised, new AMD miner is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707708

just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all...

[uray]

as promised, new AMD miner is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707708

just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all...

that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error,
what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache
and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea?

[djm34]

as promised, new AMD miner is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707708

just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all...

that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error,
what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache
and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea?

Actually you don't need them, at first I wanted one whirlpool execution per kernel and found out that a loop over the 3 last was better. I Put the change in a hurry, keeping the empty kernels (that should be transparent to the execution). instead of changing everything in the code...
(if you want to remove thes kernels from the whirpool, you need to modify in driver_opencl.c how the whirlpool kernel is implemented.

[qinyasu]

as promised, new AMD miner is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707708

just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all...

that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error,
what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache
and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea?

No window miners

[freshex_team]

https://freshex.org/ex.png
WhirlCoin now traded on Freshex!
https://freshex.org/market/whrl_btc

[qinyasu]

WhirlCoin now traded on Freshex!
https://freshex.org/market/whrl_btc

good 

[HashCookie]

I've finally managed to get whrl.hashcookie.org online, but I'm not getting any accepted shares. Could someone point some hashes there for me?  Thanks

I'm running NOMP and MPOS together, and I think it has something to do with my nomp configuration, but there's no errors anywhere...

[Amph]

i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good

[whirlcoin]

i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good

Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100?

I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it

[djm34]

i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good

Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100?

I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it

nope I don't want it 

[HashCookie]

Finally!

whrl.hashcookie.org

Is finally ready to accept miners!

[djm34]

upon request, I have updated my github rep so it uses the Uray Whirlcoin kernel.
(I haven't updated the x15 kernel yet, actually other kernels could also benefit from this sort of modifications...)
so you already have the binary, you just need to pick up that kernel in the repository.

[Amph]

i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good

Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100?

I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it

or adding more than 100 to the block reward