djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 23, 2014, 07:45:38 PM |
|
My be after 30-60days?
Doesn't sound like the best way to ask someone to release something (just saying...)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
teamcryptonator
|
|
July 23, 2014, 10:51:19 PM |
|
Hey guys! We have just added WhirlCoin to Cryptonator so now you can use all its free features Should you own an iPhone or an Android device, we also have all these in our free mobile apps for iOS / AndroidCheers
|
|
|
|
farsight
|
|
July 23, 2014, 11:35:42 PM |
|
who can give a 7850 bat file. my 7850 can only run at 1.1M /s
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 24, 2014, 12:40:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
jarvis
|
|
July 24, 2014, 01:25:03 AM |
|
Temps and speed very nice!!!!!! Thank you!!!!!
|
|
|
|
jarvis
|
|
July 24, 2014, 01:29:01 AM |
|
These are my 280x after 8 minutes of running. Still great temps.
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 24, 2014, 01:38:54 AM |
|
These are my 280x after 8 minutes of running. Still great temps. well cool temperature means, there is still a lot of room for improvement
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 24, 2014, 02:16:02 AM |
|
just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
uray
|
|
July 24, 2014, 02:23:24 AM |
|
just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all... that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error, what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 24, 2014, 02:48:27 AM |
|
just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all... that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error, what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea? Actually you don't need them, at first I wanted one whirlpool execution per kernel and found out that a loop over the 3 last was better. I Put the change in a hurry, keeping the empty kernels (that should be transparent to the execution). instead of changing everything in the code... (if you want to remove thes kernels from the whirpool, you need to modify in driver_opencl.c how the whirlpool kernel is implemented.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
qinyasu
|
|
July 24, 2014, 03:13:17 AM |
|
just curious what exactly gives the boost ? I tried to add __attribute__ ((aligned (128))); to my vectors, but I don't get any boost at all... that alignment actually has no effect, its left over of my trial and error, what give boost is, there are too much macro expansion, i think it make the code or constant too long to fit inside cache and what i really dont understand is, why do we really need empty kernel on 3rd and 4th ? i copied this from u, if i merged it into just two kernels, it result in hardware error, do you have any idea? No window miners
|
|
|
|
freshex_team
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2014, 05:52:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HashCookie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2014, 07:30:39 AM |
|
I've finally managed to get whrl.hashcookie.org online, but I'm not getting any accepted shares. Could someone point some hashes there for me? Thanks I'm running NOMP and MPOS together, and I think it has something to do with my nomp configuration, but there's no errors anywhere...
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:03:37 AM |
|
i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good
|
|
|
|
whirlcoin (OP)
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:23:50 AM |
|
i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good
Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100? I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:40:33 AM |
|
i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good
Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100? I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it nope I don't want it
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
HashCookie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:42:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:45:57 AM |
|
upon request, I have updated my github rep so it uses the Uray Whirlcoin kernel. (I haven't updated the x15 kernel yet, actually other kernels could also benefit from this sort of modifications...) so you already have the binary, you just need to pick up that kernel in the repository.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 24, 2014, 12:05:44 PM |
|
i think you should rise the block reward to 1k, because having 1M block isn't really good
Are you suggesting changing the current function which starts at 100 and ends at 10 to 1000-100? I'm not too keen on a hardfork but depending on whether people want it or not, I'll do it or adding more than 100 to the block reward
|
|
|
|
|