[ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal

[SeaSoul]

When on bittrex?

[1714972158]

1714972158

[1714972158]

1714972158

[yellowduck2]

Cool but why is no one buying this valuable innovative coin? WHRL is seriously the best most power efficient algo even better than x11.

New algo without any special feature wouldn't make it in today market. In the past yes, now no.

Look at fresh coin. New algo, with a bit more extra feature didn't even make it far.

But, due to the efficiency and parity between AMD and Nvidia, won't that make more people want to mine it & therefore use it? Why was Litecoin adopted over Bitcoin? The algorithm. If people want to mine it, people will want to buy it. I think it's just a matter of time untill it starts being traded

The market condition in the past few months and now is totally different. U can't use litecoin for comparison. The market condition then and now is totally totally different.

[unitedminers]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

[HashCookie]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

[DrSnAzZy]

Very pleased with what i have mined with my rig ALGO IS AWESOME!

[unitedminers]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

[whirlcoin]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

What happens when you try to run the Mac wallet? I only had my vm to test it in and it works there...

[dudupang]

Cool but why is no one buying this valuable innovative coin? WHRL is seriously the best most power efficient algo even better than x11.

There are also ICB and FRSH and X14, dont know which one is the best.

[unitedminers]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

What happens when you try to run the Mac wallet? I only had my vm to test it in and it works there...

I get a massage which says something like "Can not open or start Whirlcoin-qt. Do you want to send a report to Apple?". It's just a small pop up and looks very similar to the massage "not trusted app" but it's a different massage. I'm currently not at my MacBook. Xubuntu only

Edit: Back on my Mac

Code:

Process:         WhirlCoin-Qt [353]
Path:            /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
Identifier:      org.whirlcoin.app
Version:         $VERSION ($VERSION)
Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process:  launchd [130]
User ID:         501

Date/Time:       2014-07-25 19:52:11.812 +0200
OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
Report Version:  10

Interval Since Last Report:          6008736 sec
Crashes Since Last Report:           17
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   3
Anonymous UUID:                      6108B44-96AC-059-G7SA-1CD02B07A20

Crashed Thread:  0

Exception Type:  EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000

Application Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries

Dyld Error Message:
  Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/*/libdb_cxx-4.8.dylib
  Referenced from: /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
  Reason: image not found

Binary Images:
       0x107740000 -        0x107b13fff +org.whirlcoin.app ($VERSION - $VERSION) <014D9C20-C01E-39F2-AC7C-93FF6C4A871A> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
       0x107c7a000 -        0x107cc0ff7 +libssl.1.0.0.dylib (0) <BAB5B5BB-142B-3D2A-BDBE-D7821431FF79> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/Frameworks/libssl.1.0.0.dylib
       0x107cdb000 -        0x107e19fc7 +libcrypto.1.0.0.dylib (0) <0F3DFE3E-C0EF-3C6B-ADA7-3DC4D976F009> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/Frameworks/libcrypto.1.0.0.dylib
    0x7fff67340000 -     0x7fff6737493f  dyld (210.2.3) <6900F2BA-DB48-3B78-B668-58FC0CF6BCB8> /usr/lib/dyld
    0x7fff93c2a000 -     0x7fff93f89fff  com.apple.Foundation (6.8 - 945.19) <C98E55BA-553B-314B-B056-849FFB20C220> /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
    0x7fff969ce000 -     0x7fff975fbfff  com.apple.AppKit (6.8 - 1187.40) <F12CF463-6F88-32ED-9EBA-0FA2AD3CF576> /System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit
    0x7fff98a86000 -     0x7fff98a86fff  com.apple.ApplicationServices (45 - 45) <A3ABF20B-ED3A-32B5-830E-B37831A45A80> /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/ApplicationServices

[djm34]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet 

What happens when you try to run the Mac wallet? I only had my vm to test it in and it works there...

I get a massage which says something like "Can not open or start Whirlcoin-qt. Do you want to send a report to Apple?". It's just a small pop up and looks very similar to the massage "not trusted app" but it's a different massage. I'm currently not at my MacBook. Xubuntu only

you really have problems everywhere... 

[Frizork]

some news about bittrex?

[djm34]

some news about bittrex?

no IPO no bittrex
I think we should also try poloniex.

[unitedminers]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

What happens when you try to run the Mac wallet? I only had my vm to test it in and it works there...

I get a massage which says something like "Can not open or start Whirlcoin-qt. Do you want to send a report to Apple?". It's just a small pop up and looks very similar to the massage "not trusted app" but it's a different massage. I'm currently not at my MacBook. Xubuntu only

you really have problems everywhere...  

And that's only what you know

Do you have a DOGE Wallet address or a Reddit username?

[Atrides]

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

Mine directly to any exchange with DwarfPool (without any local wallet),
just put your personal wallet id getting from exchange.

We also support their requirements - autopayouts from 1 WHRL one time per hour.

That is a favorite feature of our Monero-miners ))

[whirlcoin]

Which pool do you prefer and what do you think about Hashharder or Suprnova?

And what's your preferred cl file? whirlcoin.cl, whirlcoin_old.cl or wirlpool.cl?

Is it common with the whirlcoin algo to get after a new start of ccMiner at the beginning about 55 rejects before first MHs gets accepted?

My Nvidia GTX 750 Ti settings:

Code:

#!/bin/sh

export DISPLAY=:0

export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

cd /home/x/ccminer-djm34-0723

./ccminer -t 1 -a whirlcoin -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9649 -u XXX -p X

I get about 40% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 25% with the newest SPH-SGMiner.

THX for every hint

Strange, usually that problem is to do more with internet than miners - do the rejects stop after a while?

Now at Suprnova and the same settings I get 0% rejects with the newest ccMiner and about 0,0-0,3% (only 1 GPU at 5% but decreasing) with the newest SPH-SGMiner

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

What happens when you try to run the Mac wallet? I only had my vm to test it in and it works there...

I get a massage which says something like "Can not open or start Whirlcoin-qt. Do you want to send a report to Apple?". It's just a small pop up and looks very similar to the massage "not trusted app" but it's a different massage. I'm currently not at my MacBook. Xubuntu only

Edit: Back on my Mac

Code:

Process:         WhirlCoin-Qt [353]
Path:            /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
Identifier:      org.whirlcoin.app
Version:         $VERSION ($VERSION)
Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process:  launchd [130]
User ID:         501

Date/Time:       2014-07-25 19:52:11.812 +0200
OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
Report Version:  10

Interval Since Last Report:          6008736 sec
Crashes Since Last Report:           17
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   3
Anonymous UUID:                      6108B44-96AC-059-G7SA-1CD02B07A20

Crashed Thread:  0

Exception Type:  EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000

Application Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries

Dyld Error Message:
  Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/*/libdb_cxx-4.8.dylib
  Referenced from: /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
  Reason: image not found

Binary Images:
       0x107740000 -        0x107b13fff +org.whirlcoin.app ($VERSION - $VERSION) <014D9C20-C01E-39F2-AC7C-93FF6C4A871A> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/WhirlCoin-Qt
       0x107c7a000 -        0x107cc0ff7 +libssl.1.0.0.dylib (0) <BAB5B5BB-142B-3D2A-BDBE-D7821431FF79> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/Frameworks/libssl.1.0.0.dylib
       0x107cdb000 -        0x107e19fc7 +libcrypto.1.0.0.dylib (0) <0F3DFE3E-C0EF-3C6B-ADA7-3DC4D976F009> /Applications/WhirlCoin-Qt.app/Contents/Frameworks/libcrypto.1.0.0.dylib
    0x7fff67340000 -     0x7fff6737493f  dyld (210.2.3) <6900F2BA-DB48-3B78-B668-58FC0CF6BCB8> /usr/lib/dyld
    0x7fff93c2a000 -     0x7fff93f89fff  com.apple.Foundation (6.8 - 945.19) <C98E55BA-553B-314B-B056-849FFB20C220> /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
    0x7fff969ce000 -     0x7fff975fbfff  com.apple.AppKit (6.8 - 1187.40) <F12CF463-6F88-32ED-9EBA-0FA2AD3CF576> /System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit
    0x7fff98a86000 -     0x7fff98a86fff  com.apple.ApplicationServices (45 - 45) <A3ABF20B-ED3A-32B5-830E-B37831A45A80> /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/ApplicationServices

It becomes a little complex here, but what you need to do is find any other working Mac wallet, Ricky click and 'open package contents' on the executable, navigate to Frameworks and copy libdb_cxx-4.8.dylib to the same place in the whirlcoin app - I'll release a fix when I get back to my Mac

[radus]

PAPER WALLET

http://whirlcoinpaper.tk

Source: https://github.com/RaDus1/whirlcoinpaper/

DISCLAIMER: Beta - Test before moving large amounts of coins.

Bounty address: FcXeZPJ6qk5e64qzKCxriPdHZA1zBnkyCJ

[zhaohui]

PAPER WALLET

http://whirlcoinpaper.tk

Source: https://github.com/RaDus1/whirlcoinpaper/

DISCLAIMER: Beta - Test before moving large amounts of coins.

Bounty address: FcXeZPJ6qk5e64qzKCxriPdHZA1zBnkyCJ

big improvement

[TheCoinFinder]

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet 

Or use: Hashharder's OneKey

You don't need a wallet to mine. And your coins aren't left on an exchange or on a pool. They are sent to your private address - even if you don't have a wallet.

Your OneKey will mean that at some point in the future - you can import your private keys into your wallet, and have access to all your coins, securely. In one place.

http://www.hashharder.com/whirl/whirlcoin

[whirlcoin]

PAPER WALLET

http://whirlcoinpaper.tk

Source: https://github.com/RaDus1/whirlcoinpaper/

DISCLAIMER: Beta - Test before moving large amounts of coins.

Bounty address: FcXeZPJ6qk5e64qzKCxriPdHZA1zBnkyCJ

Very nice design!

[unitedminers]

BTW I couldn't try Dwarfpool because I don't have Windows, the Mac Wallet (OSX 10.8.5) doesn't work and there is no Linux Wallet  

Or use: Hashharder's OneKey

You don't need a wallet to mine. And your coins aren't left on an exchange or on a pool. They are sent to your private address - even if you don't have a wallet.

Your OneKey will mean that at some point in the future - you can import your private keys into your wallet, and have access to all your coins, securely. In one place.

http://www.hashharder.com/whirl/whirlcoin

That's what I did in the first place but with R9 290s I get about 25% rejects and with 750 Ti about 40% rejects. With the same settings soft- and hardware I get at Suprnova nearly 0% rejects.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=679134.msg8021362#msg8021362