★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!

[paycum]

and we are going up again!

[avatarius1]

Thanks all for coins at 430-470 sats. 

[robdark]

The whole episode was a calculated attack by a powerful WHALE - it was aimed at causing FUD, so that people panic dump, while the WHALE buys at a bargain. This coin will NEVER BE CHEAP, WHEN ANON IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL.
This is a LAST OPPORTUNITY to buy at prices below 1000 or 2000 Sats.

For all we know you are this whale.

[pakage]

who is phone

[interupted]

sounds like a bittrex problem to me, And it didn't have anything to do with the Navajo code, so its still unbreakable, because it wasn't using Navajo.

[Crypto_Shark]

Best entry ive had in months

[GREEDYJOHN]

The whole episode was a calculated attack by a powerful WHALE - it was aimed at causing FUD, so that people panic dump, while the WHALE buys at a bargain. This coin will NEVER BE CHEAP, WHEN ANON IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL.
This is a LAST OPPORTUNITY to buy at prices below 1000 or 2000 Sats.

For all we know you are this whale.

I am not a whale, I JUST DO NOT LIKE THE WAY THAT PEOPLE FALL FOR WHALE SCHEMES

[Hieu]

Are you retarted or something? Stop using big font and talk like a normal person.

[GREEDYJOHN]

Are you retarted or something? Stop using big font and talk like a normal person.

What I do on this forum is none of your business - DO NOT TELL ME WHAT TO DO.

[GREEDYJOHN]

Are you retarted or something? Stop using big font and talk like a normal person.

I AM USING BIG FONT, BECAUSE OF THE CRITICAL SITUATION

[mikelitoris]

*gives big john a crayon* calm down buddy.

[Hieu]

Cool story bro. Ignored, I suggest other users to do the same.

http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/i3/53c4bb73692708-94027667

[hashforce101]

The developers of Navajo have confirmed that a successful double spend attack has occurred on the network with the attacker managing to sell almost one million Navajo on Bittrex.
Navajo has been gaining a lot of attention recently after switching the name from SummerCoinV2 and releasing a whitepaper detailing how the developers intend to implement anonymous technology and ironically using the catchphrase “The unbreakable code”. Earlier today after a wave of rumours of an attack on the network, SoopY, a core developer released a statement on BitcoinTalk:
Information shared by Bittrex, this is not a fork guys but a double-spend attack so to seem , the attacker had created a transaction within a private network and had moved the coins within 6 separately created blocks thus bypassing the 6 confirmations check at Bittrex end and they had allegedly dumped the coins for BTC and withdrawn the same and while the network reaching that block had orphaned it thereby the Bittrex wallet being short of the 937620 coins.
The double-spend attack was confirmed by Bittrex who stated that they had been working with the Navajo developers to resolve the situation and that “All coins will be replaced or honored one way or another”. The Navajo developers have said that neither the foundation nor the developers themselves own enough coins to initiate a double-spend attack and so it must have been a ‘whale’. There will be a hardfork and mandatory update but details remain unclear.
In a week that has tarnished the reputation of cryptocurrencies that use the proof-of-stake mechanism for transaction signing, this is more bad news. Earlier this week Mintpal’s security was compromised and a large amount of Vericoin stolen leading to fears of the potential for double-spend attack. The developers then ‘rolled back’ the blockchain to a block generated before the hack occurred.
Less than two months ago C2 suffered from a double-spend attack and had to take drastic measures to fix the problem.
Although news like this is never welcome, the developers seem to be busy trying to work out a solution. The last update from developer SoopY read:
Dumpers can dump , buyers will buy , but the Developer or the Foundation will never back down from the coin that’s my word.
We will keep you posted on developments.

[minerjoen]

The developers of Navajo have confirmed that a successful double spend attack has occurred on the network with the attacker managing to sell almost one million Navajo on Bittrex.
Navajo has been gaining a lot of attention recently after switching the name from SummerCoinV2 and releasing a whitepaper detailing how the developers intend to implement anonymous technology and ironically using the catchphrase “The unbreakable code”. Earlier today after a wave of rumours of an attack on the network, SoopY, a core developer released a statement on BitcoinTalk:
Information shared by Bittrex, this is not a fork guys but a double-spend attack so to seem , the attacker had created a transaction within a private network and had moved the coins within 6 separately created blocks thus bypassing the 6 confirmations check at Bittrex end and they had allegedly dumped the coins for BTC and withdrawn the same and while the network reaching that block had orphaned it thereby the Bittrex wallet being short of the 937620 coins.
The double-spend attack was confirmed by Bittrex who stated that they had been working with the Navajo developers to resolve the situation and that “All coins will be replaced or honored one way or another”. The Navajo developers have said that neither the foundation nor the developers themselves own enough coins to initiate a double-spend attack and so it must have been a ‘whale’. There will be a hardfork and mandatory update but details remain unclear.
In a week that has tarnished the reputation of cryptocurrencies that use the proof-of-stake mechanism for transaction signing, this is more bad news. Earlier this week Mintpal’s security was compromised and a large amount of Vericoin stolen leading to fears of the potential for double-spend attack. The developers then ‘rolled back’ the blockchain to a block generated before the hack occurred.
Less than two months ago C2 suffered from a double-spend attack and had to take drastic measures to fix the problem.
Although news like this is never welcome, the developers seem to be busy trying to work out a solution. The last update from developer SoopY read:
Dumpers can dump , buyers will buy , but the Developer or the Foundation will never back down from the coin that’s my word.
We will keep you posted on developments.

Maybe its good to introduce yourself, you got 0 activity and nobody knows who u are .

[m3]

devs of this coin as flaky as hell i asked for an interview like 2 days ago and one of the members of the dev team said hed get back to me. Never heard from anybody. Devs are shit just say away this coin is as good as dead. I am willing to bet the anon system is not coming anytime soon. So glad i sold earlier today everybody who is holding have fun loosing your money on a shitcoin scamcoin

[ObscureBean]

Relax guys, I think it's clear by now that the dev is legit and that's all that really matters.
At a time when scams are running rampant and it's hard to trust strangers, having an honest and dependable dev is really the most important aspect of a coin for investors.
Ok there was a deliberate double attack but that's something that can happen to any coin.
I am of course holding my NAV and will possibly by up some more if I can muster up the BTC  
Can't wait for this to be over so we can get back to the exciting stuff  

[Hieu]

FUDs since SUM1 and none of them were true

[interupted]

i asked for an interview like 2 days ago and one of the members of the dev team said hed get back to me. Never heard from anybody.


Well that may be, however I sent soopy a private message and he replied to me. So I know hes trying, just imagine how many people sent him messages.   To me it looks like they are busy working to fix the problem and then move forward as planned.  

[m3]

yes I asked him for it 2 days ago way before any of this shit happened and was promised a response within 24 hours. Did not get anything. LMAO what are they so busy with now.. scamming the market for another 900k coins?

[m3]

I do not have an honor for a lying flakey dev why should I? So far he has not delivered anything except a proposition for anon transactions with a markup of a windows wallet. Yeaaaaaa....