|
Tril (OP)
|
 |
April 30, 2011, 11:53:42 PM |
|
I have a tx showing 0/unconfirmed, which won't change even if I use -rescan.
Here's what I did:
1. send tx
2. immediately quit bitcoin
3. move wallet.dat aside, replace with a different one
4. run bitcoin. The tx doesn't appear, as expected
5. wait for a new block- tx appears with 1 confirmation (since this wallet is the recipient)
6. quit bitcoin
7. put original wallet.dat back.
8. tx still stuck at 0/unconfirmed. all other tx have confirmations increasing. -rescan has no effect.
This seems to be a bug, since rescan should work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
error
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:01:46 AM |
|
Pretty soon someone knowledgeable is going to come along and say:
"Run bitcoin -debug, double click the transaction, and paste the contents of the Transaction Details window."
|
3KzNGwzRZ6SimWuFAgh4TnXzHpruHMZmV8
|
|
|
|
riX
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:12:57 AM |
|
Or you could check if the transaction made it into the blockchain on blockexplorer.com..
|
|
|
|
|
Tril (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:48:32 AM |
|
I fixed this by restoring a copy of wallet.dat from before I made the tx in question, then running -rescan. I would still like to know if there's a reason for the behavior I saw. It seems from the warning at http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/blockchain/ (from the README.txt), that wallets with unprocessed transactions have known issues. |
|
|
|
|
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:52:05 AM |
|
I had the same thing, I recovered by deleting the databases (but not wallet.dat) and then running bitcoin, telling it to connect to another node on my network running bitcoin, so it could redownload the whole block chain without sapping my internet connection.
|
Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable. I never believe them. If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins. I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion. Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice. Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
|
|
|
|
randomguy7
|
|
May 01, 2011, 01:20:55 AM |
|
How can you make it connect to some specific node? Thats exactly what I need right now  |
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5180
Merit: 12900
|
|
May 01, 2011, 01:23:12 AM |
|
I think it's a rescan bug.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
|
|
May 01, 2011, 02:19:23 AM |
|
How can you make it connect to some specific node? Thats exactly what I need right now there is a command line option type bitcoin -? for help I believe it's -connect=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx |
Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable. I never believe them. If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins. I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion. Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice. Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
|
|
|
|
Tril (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2011, 05:39:10 AM |
|
How can you make it connect to some specific node? Thats exactly what I need right now there is a command line option type bitcoin -? for help I believe it's -connect=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -connect= is correct. Add -nolisten=1 (which implies -noirc=1) if you don't want other connections either. From my experience, having only one connection is bad if you're using the wallet with any miners. Bitcoin often disconnects from peers and incorrectly displays it has a connection, so you'll be behind on the tx pool quite a bit. Try to have at least 8 peers when mining! Also, it's faster to download new blocks if you have more than 1 peer, since that peer will sometimes throttle/disconnect you. If you're just updating blocks and not mining, one peer will work if you're patient, since it will keep retrying. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pieter Wuille
|
|
May 01, 2011, 08:42:17 AM |
|
I have a tx showing 0/unconfirmed, which won't change even if I use -rescan.
Here's what I did:
1. send tx
2. immediately quit bitcoin
3. move wallet.dat aside, replace with a different one
4. run bitcoin. The tx doesn't appear, as expected
5. wait for a new block- tx appears with 1 confirmation (since this wallet is the recipient)
6. quit bitcoin
7. put original wallet.dat back.
8. tx still stuck at 0/unconfirmed. all other tx have confirmations increasing. -rescan has no effect.
This seems to be a bug, since rescan should work.
Strange indeed, this shouldn't happen. And it definitely shouldn't remain after a rescan. Couple of questions though: * which version of bitcoin are you using * you say "since this wallet is the recipient", so you're using an address from the new wallet as destination for a tx from the old one? * did you only move wallet.dat aside, or the whole datadir? |
I do Bitcoin stuff.
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
|
|
May 01, 2011, 01:23:04 PM |
|
This happened to me too.
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
|
Tril (OP)
|
|
May 02, 2011, 03:24:45 PM |
|
Strange indeed, this shouldn't happen. And it definitely shouldn't remain after a rescan. Couple of questions though:
* which version of bitcoin are you using
The problem originally occurred in 0.3.20.2 and I upgraded to 0.3.21 to see if it would fix the problem, and it didn't. I rescanned in both with no effect. * you say "since this wallet is the recipient", so you're using an address from the new wallet as destination for a tx from the old one?
yes * did you only move wallet.dat aside, or the whole datadir?
I only moved wallet.dat aside. |
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Beckenham
|
|
May 22, 2011, 11:53:13 AM |
|
I've got this problem too... deleted everything in the data dir except for: wallet.dat blk0001.dat blkindex.dat restarted bitcoin with: bitcoin -addnode=x.x.x.x -rescan -debug and it still tells me the following is 0/unconfirmed: (Uuuh, actually, copy+paste has never worked for me in the Transaction Details window on Windows XP client). I've tried Ctrl-C, Ctrl+Ins, drag-n-drop, right-clicking the text with the mouse... nothing will copy it to the clipboard.
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Beckenham
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:01:52 PM |
|
 All of these (inputs+outputs) are in blocks as shown by blockexplorer.com. |
|
|
|
|
m0Ray
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:04:35 PM |
|
Try using this code to delete all transactions from wallet, then rescan: http://m0ray.net/sites/default/files/bitcoin/bc_tx.tar.bz2Deleting transaction from wallet, AFAIK, is not dangerous because all confirmed transactions are reconstructed during rescan. Maybe this function must be included in bitcoin/bitcoind. |
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5180
Merit: 12900
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:06:04 PM |
|
You also need to delete blk0001.dat and blkindex.dat. I think this is a rescan bug.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
|
Alex Beckenham
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:08:49 PM |
|
You also need to delete blk0001.dat and blkindex.dat. I think this is a rescan bug.
Damn, really? I just re-downloaded it 2 days ago. Perhaps it's the node that I'm adding that has a bad copy of it? Could someone else give me a node to connect to so that I can be sure I'm not getting it from the aforementioned x.x.x.x? Thanks. p.s. Thanks for the code m0Ray, it'll be an interesting read, however I haven't compiled C since uni quite a few years ago now. |
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5180
Merit: 12900
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:12:56 PM |
|
If you already redownloaded after the problem developed, then doing it again probably won't help. You can't have gotten a bad copy, since Bitcoin checks the blocks before adding them to the database (unless you manually replaced the files).
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
|
Pieter Wuille
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:15:43 PM |
|
You also need to delete blk0001.dat and blkindex.dat. I think this is a rescan bug.
You're right. -rescan only adds missing transactions to the wallet. It doesn't update wallet transactions with missing information from the block chain. Maybe we need a separate -rescan-full, or change the meaning of -rescan to do this anyway, as a regular rescan is now done immediately anyway? |
I do Bitcoin stuff.
|
|
|
|
Alex Beckenham
|
|
May 22, 2011, 12:16:32 PM |
|
If you already redownloaded after the problem developed, then doing it again probably won't help. You can't have gotten a bad copy, since Bitcoin checks the blocks before adding them to the database (unless you manually replaced the files).
Okay uh, I just deleted the block chain before I read your post  Anyway, I was on 3.20 so I'm getting 3.21 now and obviously I'll be getting the block chain again. |
|
|
|
|
