Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 07:31:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta > Should abusers/spammers of trust system be removed from the DefaultTrust chain?
Pages: [1]
« previous topic next topic »
  Print  
Author Topic: Should abusers/spammers of trust system be removed from the DefaultTrust chain?  (Read 755 times)
rarkenin (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 06:07:06 PM
 #1
For example, user U1TRA_L0RD is trusted in DefaultTrust from bitpop, while he has unanimously negative feedback that is from DefaultTrust and also negative-spammed Vod.

Should this be handled in general? I do not mean to single out U1TRA_L0RD as an example, there are potentially more such users that do not belong on DefaultTrust. Or should I PM the person that trusts him (in this case bitpop) to resolve this?
1715283101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715283101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715283101
1715283101
Reply with quote  #2
1715283101
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715283101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715283101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715283101
1715283101
Reply with quote  #2
1715283101
Report to moderator
mprep
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610


In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2014, 08:37:45 PM
 #2
Quote from: rarkenin on July 18, 2014, 06:07:06 PM
For example, user U1TRA_L0RD is trusted in DefaultTrust from bitpop, while he has unanimously negative feedback that is from DefaultTrust and also negative-spammed Vod.

Should this be handled in general? I do not mean to single out U1TRA_L0RD as an example, there are potentially more such users that do not belong on DefaultTrust. Or should I PM the person that trusts him (in this case bitpop) to resolve this?
I recommend PMing the person that trusts him since he's responsible for maintaining his trust list.
Mobius7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:10:27 PM
 #3
U1TRA_L0RD's feedback are hidden and "untrusted" by default, unless you set your trust depth at 3.
There is another similar case for TradeFortress (Free hugs! ♥) Tongue
PRIMEDICE.
   The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience
  Most Trusted & Popular | Active Chat & Community | Free BTC Faucet | 1% Edge
rarkenin (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:14:56 PM
 #4
Quote from: Mobius7 on July 18, 2014, 10:10:27 PM
U1TRA_L0RD's feedback are hidden and "untrusted" by default, unless you set your trust depth at 3.
There is another similar case for TradeFortress (Free hugs! ♥) Tongue

I thought the default was 3. Am I mistaken?
Mobius7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:18:12 PM
 #5
Quote from: rarkenin on July 18, 2014, 10:14:56 PM
Quote from: Mobius7 on July 18, 2014, 10:10:27 PM
U1TRA_L0RD's feedback are hidden and "untrusted" by default, unless you set your trust depth at 3.
There is another similar case for TradeFortress (Free hugs! ♥) Tongue

I thought the default was 3. Am I mistaken?

The default depth is indeed 2, according to my own experience and also https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0.
Quote from: theymos on May 21, 2013, 11:23:33 AM
These scores are taken from your trust network. They are not global scores. You can edit your trust network here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
If your trust depth is set to 2 (the default), you will trust feedback by people you trust, people they trust, and people they trust. I might change the default in the future; we'll see how this works. Your trust list is public.
PRIMEDICE.
   The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience
  Most Trusted & Popular | Active Chat & Community | Free BTC Faucet | 1% Edge
koshgel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:36:37 PM
 #6
Quote from: mprep on July 18, 2014, 08:37:45 PM
Quote from: rarkenin on July 18, 2014, 06:07:06 PM
For example, user U1TRA_L0RD is trusted in DefaultTrust from bitpop, while he has unanimously negative feedback that is from DefaultTrust and also negative-spammed Vod.

Should this be handled in general? I do not mean to single out U1TRA_L0RD as an example, there are potentially more such users that do not belong on DefaultTrust. Or should I PM the person that trusts him (in this case bitpop) to resolve this?
I recommend PMing the person that trusts him since he's responsible for maintaining his trust list.

This is definitely the best way to handle it.

I imagine it would be complicated and difficult to go through each user on the list to see if they belong.
Mobius7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:48:46 PM
 #7
Quote from: koshgel on July 18, 2014, 10:36:37 PM
I imagine it would be complicated and difficult to go through each user on the list to see if they belong.

If anyone is interested in the trust list of every person, you may check the thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=684268.0 Smiley
PRIMEDICE.
   The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience
  Most Trusted & Popular | Active Chat & Community | Free BTC Faucet | 1% Edge
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta > Should abusers/spammers of trust system be removed from the DefaultTrust chain?
 « previous topic next topic »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!