[ANN][ELITE] EliteCoin - Only 20k ELC! - NO PREMINE! X11 POW+POS - *BITTREX!*

[MartinF]

Now that the diff has dropped a lot compared to yesterday, I think I'm going to rent some rigs! Or maybe one and see how it goes.

[IceColdTommy]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

And why not, he invested rented equipment and is mining like crazy, so why not get coin, if you also want to get more coins rent! and stop crying like baby

Crying? I'm alarming the dev of a potential 51% attack on the network. Not only on PoW, but on PoS, and all he needs is 50% of the STAKED coins, not on exchanges. This is going to be a disaster.

i will only say LOL and stop responding to you shit posts, go for the next coin it seems you quite go for every new

[CryptoTV]

I'm sorry but we're going to do what the community wants, and it seems that 50%+ wants 20000 blocks, as planned. And we are ok with that, because it was our plan from the beginning.

And if someone owns a lot of coins, good for him! It must be because he invested.

Only 36 hours has passed, this is a long term coin! If you prefer to mine something really fast and sell, there are a lot of coins like that already.

Hey Dev, I sent you a PM check it out. its good.

[BoyHowdy]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

Dedicated has 4 times the hash as xhash. You are so full of FUD your eyes are brown.

[n3rfherder]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

Dedicated has 4 times the hash as xhash. You are so full of FUD your eyes are brown.

lol ya that guy is an idiot.  7gh/s wouldn't even have 50% of one pools hash.

[paradigmflux]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

xhash must be on a bad fork then.

[CryptoTV]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

Dedicated has 4 times the hash as xhash. You are so full of FUD your eyes are brown.

lol ya that guy is an idiot.  7gh/s wouldn't even have 50% of one pools hash.

there was a guy who popped in for about 30 mins was pushing 15gh/s then left lol.

[AnonymousEconomist]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

Dedicated has 4 times the hash as xhash. You are so full of FUD your eyes are brown.

lol ya that guy is an idiot.  7gh/s wouldn't even have 50% of one pools hash.

Lol... You guys probably pitched in for those 7GH... just look at the amount of coins he is making...

[BoyHowdy]

Net hashrate is sinking...

And ONE miner named hashking has 7GH mining 200 coins a day on xhash.net...

You might want to end that PoW before ONE person owns 50% of the coins.

Dedicated has 4 times the hash as xhash. You are so full of FUD your eyes are brown.

lol ya that guy is an idiot.  7gh/s wouldn't even have 50% of one pools hash.

Lol... You guys probably pitched in for those 7GH... just look at the amount of coins he is making...

If I had 7gh there is no way I would be on xhash. He is probably getting paid a bounty by xhash to mine there.

[BoyHowdy]

Looks like solo miners are starting up. The pool hash does not add up anymore.

[HunterS]

why is money supply over 4k yet its should be same as block count since PoS doesnt start till end of PoW

[hash77away]

Looks like solo miners are starting up. The pool hash does not add up anymore.

Lots of private pools out there

[@scambuster]

I have linked this poll to the official ANN.

Please discuss everything about this in our post.

It is a scammer behavior that cutting off pow blocks rather than sticking to the orignal statement.Shame on you dev and the bunch of guys who are planing this.

Thank you mr. new account just made to......troll this coin?

No.I am busted enough by scam coins.It's time to bust them back.See my anaynize of honorcoin?

[HunterS]

So no one cares that money supply over 4k yet its should be same as block count since PoS doesnt start till end of PoW

[EliteCoin]

So no one cares that money supply over 4k yet its should be same as block count since PoS doesnt start till end of PoW

Thanks for telling this! It's a visual bug, our mistake!

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - - nValueIn;"

it should be:

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - nValueIn;

It has a double - symbol which it's causing to sum the nValueIn.

I'll fix it right now and upload the new code and wallets!

[goodluckpool]

So no one cares that money supply over 4k yet its should be same as block count since PoS doesnt start till end of PoW

Thanks for telling this! It's a visual bug, our mistake!

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - - nValueIn;"

it should be:

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - nValueIn;

It has a double - symbol which it's causing to sum the nValueIn.

I'll fix it right now and upload the new code and wallets!

oh, its just a visual error not true error.

[HunterS]

So no one cares that money supply over 4k yet its should be same as block count since PoS doesnt start till end of PoW

Thanks for telling this! It's a visual bug, our mistake!

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - - nValueIn;"

it should be:

"(pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - nValueIn;

It has a double - symbol which it's causing to sum the nValueIn.

I'll fix it right now and upload the new code and wallets!

no worries.cheers

[EliteCoin]

but a pool refuse to update the wallet can get more coins? will you hardfork it?

There's no need to do that!
It's only a visual bug. If you update the wallet you will see the right supply, which should be the same number as the current blocks found.

[EliteCoin]

WALLET UPDATE!

It's NOT mandatory. It fixes the wrong money supply the info shows.
This bug was caused by this line:

pindex->nMoneySupply = (pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - - nValueIn;

That line had a double - instead of one, causing to show the wrong supply. Now it is:

pindex->nMoneySupply = (pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - nValueIn;

FOLLOW THIS STEPS:
1. Download the new wallet.
- Windows: https://mega.co.nz/#!TMRSiQ7S!7Pvtqz9zSJHxtRaQmt0vkYx9pWuL74V9rqqoejV8C8I
- Source: https://github.com/elitecoindevs/elitecoin

2. Go to your EliteCoin folder, BACKUP wallet.dat (just in case).

3. You will need to re-download the chain. Delete everything inside .EliteCoin (except your wallet.dat!!!).

4. Open your new wallet and let it sync. Done! Now it's showing the right amount.

[CryptoTV]

WALLET UPDATE!

It's NOT mandatory. It fixes the wrong money supply the info shows.
This bug was caused by this line:

pindex->nMoneySupply = (pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - - nValueIn;

That line had a double - instead of one, causing to show the wrong supply. Now it is:

pindex->nMoneySupply = (pindex->pprev? pindex->pprev->nMoneySupply : 0) + nValueOut - nValueIn;

FOLLOW THIS STEPS:
1. Download the new wallet.
- Windows: https://mega.co.nz/#!TMRSiQ7S!7Pvtqz9zSJHxtRaQmt0vkYx9pWuL74V9rqqoejV8C8I
- Source: https://github.com/elitecoindevs/elitecoin

2. Go to your EliteCoin folder, BACKUP wallet.dat (just in case).

3. You will need to re-download the chain. Delete everything inside .EliteCoin (except your wallet.dat!!!).

4. Open your new wallet and let it sync. Done! Now it's showing the right amount.

That was a quick response to the issue, hope we can expect a lot more action like this!

sent you another pm, dev.