xcloudcoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 27, 2014, 05:05:37 PM |
|
The point is that exchange has lost its credibilty and cant be trusted either with user funds.. I wont be surprised if they disappear soon.
Just been around here long enough to see bad things happen.
I don't think it's that bad yet. But they certainly seemed to have ruined their ICO model, with very lenient rules and bizarrely running so many, so close together. I think this is what, around 4 ICOs on Bittrex in like 3 weeks now? Iceberg - Architect - Venture and now this one? I assumed the dev was also going to do a Poloniex ICO too, as earlier he stated he was applying for it. It seemed to make more sense to me than exclusively holding it on Bittrex, especially if he plans on selling the ICO out. We are still waiting for poloniex to replay back from the email send with requirements set by them, bittrex should be updating their requirements soon and making them public. then again everyone is free to use our test account to view our features or send us an inbox and we would be more then happy to send them an invite.
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
July 27, 2014, 05:11:44 PM |
|
The point is that exchange has lost its credibilty and cant be trusted either with user funds.. I wont be surprised if they disappear soon.
Just been around here long enough to see bad things happen.
I don't think it's that bad yet. But they certainly seemed to have ruined their ICO model, with very lenient rules and bizarrely running so many, so close together. I think this is what, around 4 ICOs on Bittrex in like 3 weeks now? Iceberg - Architect - Venture and now this one? I assumed the dev was also going to do a Poloniex ICO too, as earlier he stated he was applying for it. It seemed to make more sense to me than exclusively holding it on Bittrex, especially if he plans on selling the ICO out. We are still waiting for poloniex to replay back from the email send with requirements set by them, bittrex should be updating their requirements soon and making them public. then again everyone is free to use our test account to view our features or send us an inbox and we would be more then happy to send them an invite. Okay, thanks. If Bittrex uses somewhat strict requirements, it should help a little. But as I'm sure you have noted, there is some level of distrust with Bittrex lately. How long will the ICO run for (if the ICO doesn't sell out), and what is the base price per coin?And after I stopped being lazy and checked the ann page, I see that info. 4 week ICO? You sure about that? Seems a bit on the long side.
|
|
|
|
joelpina
|
|
July 27, 2014, 05:24:11 PM |
|
Looks Perfect Coin....Really............
I agree its perfect coin to loose your money in
|
|
|
|
xcloudcoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 27, 2014, 05:53:28 PM Last edit: July 27, 2014, 06:11:56 PM by xcloudcoin |
|
The point is that exchange has lost its credibilty and cant be trusted either with user funds.. I wont be surprised if they disappear soon.
Just been around here long enough to see bad things happen.
I don't think it's that bad yet. But they certainly seemed to have ruined their ICO model, with very lenient rules and bizarrely running so many, so close together. I think this is what, around 4 ICOs on Bittrex in like 3 weeks now? Iceberg - Architect - Venture and now this one? I assumed the dev was also going to do a Poloniex ICO too, as earlier he stated he was applying for it. It seemed to make more sense to me than exclusively holding it on Bittrex, especially if he plans on selling the ICO out. We are still waiting for poloniex to replay back from the email send with requirements set by them, bittrex should be updating their requirements soon and making them public. then again everyone is free to use our test account to view our features or send us an inbox and we would be more then happy to send them an invite. Okay, thanks. If Bittrex uses somewhat strict requirements, it should help a little. But as I'm sure you have noted, there is some level of distrust with Bittrex lately. How long will the ICO run for (if the ICO doesn't sell out), and what is the base price per coin?And after I stopped being lazy and checked the ann page, I see that info. 4 week ICO? You sure about that? Seems a bit on the long side. yea i noticed, what i could tell you is that we used the same documents from the poloniex requirements and a few others for the bittrex requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
xcloudcoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 27, 2014, 10:02:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
rugrats
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 250
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
July 27, 2014, 10:04:37 PM |
|
On Current Development Wallet & Cloud Anonymous mixer Decentralized P2P trade Cloud Mining Online wallet Anonymous email XCloudVoip Every single coin claiming VOIP integration + anonymity has thus far turned out to be scams. Off the top of my head, we've had Kakacoin, Korecoin, Smoke, Veilcoin, etc. Nevermind issues with blockchain size, bandwidth requirements or TOR network limitations, the thing is, how the heck can you remain anonymous when there are two known, identifiable points, i.e., the caller and the receiver? Someone capable of resolving these issues would gain instant fame within the crypto community. He would be a star of the cryptocurrency world. It would make sense for that person to not hide behind a new alt account. Right? Unless this is also a scam?
|
|
|
|
cassius69
|
|
July 27, 2014, 10:06:04 PM |
|
^^^^ $300,000.000 USD. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
|
|
|
|
RonMank
|
|
July 27, 2014, 10:21:37 PM |
|
isnt storj doing this?
|
|
|
|
ticoti
|
|
July 27, 2014, 11:10:38 PM |
|
Spanish translation is still open.
I will do spanish translation
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
July 28, 2014, 12:42:00 AM |
|
Nevermind issues with blockchain size, bandwidth requirements or TOR network limitations, the thing is, how the heck can you remain anonymous when there are two known, identifiable points, i.e., the caller and the receiver?
It is done by using an encrypted packet communication between the caller and a central server, which then sends another encrypted packet to the intended receiver. A snoop would only be able to discern the sender and the server, but could not reliably connect the sender to the intended receiver if there was sufficient other traffic from that server. Military grade uses fake messages and dead end addresses to lose messages in the fog. It is also very very slow.
|
|
|
|
rugrats
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 250
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
July 28, 2014, 12:57:39 AM |
|
Nevermind issues with blockchain size, bandwidth requirements or TOR network limitations, the thing is, how the heck can you remain anonymous when there are two known, identifiable points, i.e., the caller and the receiver?
It is done by using an encrypted packet communication between the caller and a central server, which then sends another encrypted packet to the intended receiver. A snoop would only be able to discern the sender and the server, but could not reliably connect the sender to the intended receiver if there was sufficient other traffic from that server. Military grade uses fake messages and dead end addresses to lose messages in the fog. It is also very very slow.
Would it be safe to conclude then that you are the dev for this coin? If so, are you saying that xcloudcoin wallet would in fact be dependent on a central server, and it is not a decentralized currency after all, similar to, say, POScoin?
|
|
|
|
xcloudcoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2014, 02:19:29 AM Last edit: July 28, 2014, 02:35:10 AM by xcloudcoin |
|
Nevermind issues with blockchain size, bandwidth requirements or TOR network limitations, the thing is, how the heck can you remain anonymous when there are two known, identifiable points, i.e., the caller and the receiver?
It is done by using an encrypted packet communication between the caller and a central server, which then sends another encrypted packet to the intended receiver. A snoop would only be able to discern the sender and the server, but could not reliably connect the sender to the intended receiver if there was sufficient other traffic from that server. Military grade uses fake messages and dead end addresses to lose messages in the fog. It is also very very slow.
Would it be safe to conclude then that you are the dev for this coin? If so, are you saying that xcloudcoin wallet would in fact be dependent on a central server, and it is not a decentralized currency after all, similar to, say, POScoin? oh nice to see others get in the conversation, hes not the dev for this coin! at this moment we are still working out details for the anon mixer, and testing a few scenarios, a white paper will be release once we begin beta testing the mixer. going back to your original post, we are not here to get fame, we want to do our best to deliver something good, and right now we have something to show for. like i stated before everyone is free to use our test account or send us an inbox and i would be more then happy to give then an invite. our two main twitter profiles https://twitter.com/xcloudcoinhttps://twitter.com/Rdanetti
|
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
July 28, 2014, 02:52:32 AM |
|
interesting we will see how it goes
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 28, 2014, 02:59:47 AM |
|
With no PoW or mining, this is not even a crypto currency. It is a greedy dev money grab, and I would bet we won't see any of the pictured features. Man this crap has to stop. Coins are to be mined, that is why it is called MINING! They are not all to be minted and sold so the cartoon dev can retire on an island.
|
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 28, 2014, 10:40:58 AM |
|
Looks very confusing 1 CLD will be available for 0.0001030 btc Everything is based on 8 digits, so it should be 1 CLD will be available for 0.00010300 btc First it was looking that they are selling at 1030sats and then i thought, dammit, i will certainly buy a few, but then i notice, it is not 1030 sats but 10300 and this will be another story.
|
|
|
|
coppldk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2014, 11:32:43 AM |
|
If don't sell the whole coins, what about the rest ones?
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
July 28, 2014, 11:49:29 AM |
|
Nevermind issues with blockchain size, bandwidth requirements or TOR network limitations, the thing is, how the heck can you remain anonymous when there are two known, identifiable points, i.e., the caller and the receiver?
It is done by using an encrypted packet communication between the caller and a central server, which then sends another encrypted packet to the intended receiver. A snoop would only be able to discern the sender and the server, but could not reliably connect the sender to the intended receiver if there was sufficient other traffic from that server. Military grade uses fake messages and dead end addresses to lose messages in the fog. It is also very very slow.
Would it be safe to conclude then that you are the dev for this coin? If so, are you saying that xcloudcoin wallet would in fact be dependent on a central server, and it is not a decentralized currency after all, similar to, say, POScoin? I am not the dev for any coin. I answered your question becuz I have "familiarity" with the process. Dont ask how, If I told you I would have to kill you.
|
|
|
|
tonyback
|
|
July 28, 2014, 12:12:51 PM |
|
i can translate to Vietnamese
|
|
|
|
|