Bittrex is sure trying to run their ICO model into the ground, aren't they?
So soon after Iceberg bombed, and Architect couldn't even get off the ground, they start a new ICO.
Anyone else notice how few ICOs are run on Polo after they instituted their new rules, which include identification + holding funds until they are used? If an ICO dev is on the level, run it on Polo and use their rules.
This is an interesting point. So, Bittrex is turning into a scam-funding operation probably taking a hefty cut of the IPO sales, while Poloniex is where devs are actually held liable for following up their IPO with delivering the development promises, as their identities are held as a bond?