[Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More

[augustocroppo]

As such I asked John to provide nominee services while I retained complete control of BTCI Ltd. via a power of attorney and control of the company seals.

I am working on getting the signed copy of the various agreements / registrations with the Hong Kong Corporation prepared and sent out to two neutral 3rd parties to vouch for their validity. If this cannot be done prior to noon, EST, I will gladly postpone the IPO until said people can verify the agreements. Additionally, I will provide them a redacted copy of the purchase agreement for 2150 N. Court Street, which will show that we have 90 days to purchase the building, and we are said winners of auction that took place on June 12th.

I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp.

What "two neutral 3rd parties"?

MrWDunne and CanaryInTheMine

I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp.

You are not in possession of "real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement". If you have anything at all, it must be a digitalized copy of such documents. Moreover, you are 17 years old and your identity is unclear. We cannot know how much credible you are to attest for the authenticity of such documents. Your reputation as trader do not grant you credibility to vouch for unseen documents.

My identity is known to many people, just not you.  if you attend cryptolina, we can meet.
I wish I was 17, if I knew then what I know now...
in fact, I do posses said documents.

I can confirm that I have seen both the property contract and the contract between the HK company and Coin Services LLC. They do have the square footage required.

Benny said he controls the BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT via power of attorney. We all know this is granted by a written and signed document. We all know as well that such document is very sensitive since it proves that a legal entity is authorized to represent another legal entity. Benny just admitted he was preparing a signed copy to send to neutral parties appointed by himself. This was stated at 02:01:49 PM (GMT). Anyone familiar with validation of documents knows that it takes more than few hours to authenticate sensitive documents. So after Benny statement, at 06:02:31 PM (GMT), CanaryInTheMine made his first statement confirming he had the documents sent by Benny. When I confronted CanaryInTheMine that he had just digitalized copies, he insisted he was in physical possession of the documents. So we are lead to believe that Benny got a copy of two important documents verified and signed, then sent to CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne in 4 hours frame time? I am starting to think CanaryInTheMine refusal to publish the documents is due the fact that there is no power of attorney. CanaryInTheMine insistence to not reveal his name reinforces my suspicion.Assuming that Benny sent the verified and signed document copies via mail, it is quite easy to him produce evidence that he did this. All Benny have to do is present the receipt or the tracking number of the mail sent to CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne.

It is also worth to note that both CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne are not providing the necessary details about the documents. None admitted they had received a verified and signed copy of a power of attorney. CanaryInTheMine addressed the document as  "executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp." and MrWDunne as "contract between the HK company and Coin Services LLC".

[augustocroppo]

@Gleb Gamow:  Sarcasm doesn't travel well through the intertubes anyway, and Augusto Croppo may not be a native speaker (which muddies things up more).

</back under my rock>

True, I am not native English speaker. However I know Bruno for enough time to know that his is being sarcastic. I really wished Benny had sent the documents to me. I would vouch for him after examine the authenticity of such important documents. Instead he decided to send to people already biased in his favour. I think I did everything I could to clarify what was necessary. Now is up to Benny comply with what he promised. I will not insist on this matter further and I wish all the best for all parties involved.

[floatyfish]

Augusto, if you were shown the documents would you share them with everybody else or would you only examine them for authenticity and then report back here?

[Gleb Gamow]

I wonder if Benny cloaks some his of domain names to keep his ID secret from the prying eyes of his God: https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&es_sm=122&q=%22Creation+Date%3A+2013-12-13+12%3A12%3A00Z%22&oq=%22Creation+Date%3A+2013-12-13+12%3A12%3A00Z%22&gs_l=serp.3...2211.2211.0.2522.1.1.0.0.0.0.101.101.0j1.1.0.chm_loc%2Chmss2%3Dfalse%2Chms2min%3D10%2Chms2max%3D10%2Chmtb%3D120%2Chmta%3D1440%2Chmrde%3D0-0%2Chmde%3D1-0%2Chmmpp1%3D0-5%2Chmmpp2%3D0-3%2Chmth%3D4%2Chmffs%3D10000...0...1.1.49.serp..1.0.0.2DP6e2rBT2M

You know what would be so fuckin' funny? What if... remember, this is ONLY a what-if thingie... what if Brandon and Benjamin Schlichter ministered to children at their church. Their only  saving grace (no pun intended) would be if parents of said children (if such were the case, for I'm not saying such is true) didn't have internet connections.

[Gleb Gamow]

This fuckin' sucks! I just received an email offering up proof, of sorts, that it's possible that Brothers Schlick may be behind another Havelock IPO that consists of...wait for it...gambling. S/He's proof looks pretty damning, thus now I may need to vector my research over there. I also had a hunch, and did see some of the links presented, but now have to revisit them and see how the dots connect. To think all this exposure was due to Danny Brewster.

[augustocroppo]

Augusto, if you were shown the documents would you share them with everybody else or would you only examine them for authenticity and then report back here?

That depends what Benny wants. I could examine the documents and report back without share with anyone. However I recommend Benny share this documents with the general public. This would certainly result in a great deal of trust to him. If everything is all right, there is nothing to fear from public scrutiny.

[boldar]

In all honesty, do you really think that making the documents publicly available would stop these guys from continuing to use Google to "research" and invent more distractions from the actual topic?... I would agree with you if we were dealing with rational human beings. However, it's quite evident that we are not.  It's amazing how much complete rubbish they have posted which has buried any loosely relevant points they may have had, while removing any credibility by their use of infantile rants and insults.

Had they stuck to any specific point or line of reasoning, their posts may have had merit. But if you notice, there seems to be a pattern that the people with genuine inquiries that may be considering the offer are on topic and have posts that are respectfully worded. While the posts speaking out against this offer are quite rude, disrespectful and insulting.

It's funny that the FUD spreaders very presence and amount of effort spent seems to indicate how truly threatened they are that this offering has the potential to be quite successful.  

[boldar]

Ok, you can stop illustrating my point now... I guess my line of reasoning is that if any of these posts had relevant information then you wouldn't need to resort to threats and insults to make them.

I really wish the "USB-Crayons" input device had never been invented now.

[Sahtor]

Yada yada, lots of screenshots etc etc.

What is your point?

It seems like it should be obvious that Full Power Asia Investment is a shell company set up in Hong Kong to work around the legalities of having a US based company selling equity shares. Brandon and Benny are brothers, so it makes sense that Ben would ask Branny for a reference to a firm that sets up companies in Hong Kong, thus they both end up with shell corps created by the same person. I don't see any wrongdoing here?

The structure was stated openly up front, investors get a portion of the company, Branny gets the rest as payment for doing all the legwork in setting this thing up. If you think he is taking too large a share, then don't invest.

Same quote applies here with BTCI and Benny.

[augustocroppo]

https://www.havelockinvestments.com/fund.php?symbol=HASH

Big Trends Capital Investment, Limited has entered a consulting services agreement with, Coin Services LLC an an Ohio based cryptocurrency mining company, and hardware reseller, which owns and operates its trademarked “BuyAHash” service. Capital raised from the private placement will be utilized to grow the business in a variety of areas.

So BIG TRENDS CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED owns and operates the trademark "BuyAHash"?

Let me note that Benny already registered a company with the name "HASH BUY LLC":

http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/bsqry/f?p=100:7:0::NO:7:P7_CHARTER_NUM:2298945

Entity Number: 2298945
Business Name: HASH BUY LLC
Filing Type: DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Status: Active
Original Filing Date: 05/29/2014

It is becoming confusing to determine who owns what...

[Benny1985]

https://www.havelockinvestments.com/fund.php?symbol=HASH

Big Trends Capital Investment, Limited has entered a consulting services agreement with, Coin Services LLC an an Ohio based cryptocurrency mining company, and hardware reseller, which owns and operates its trademarked “BuyAHash” service. Capital raised from the private placement will be utilized to grow the business in a variety of areas.

So BIG TRENDS CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED owns and operates the trademark "BuyAHash"?

Let me note that Benny already registered a company with the name "HASH BUY LLC":

http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/bsqry/f?p=100:7:0::NO:7:P7_CHARTER_NUM:2298945

Entity Number: 2298945
Business Name: HASH BUY LLC
Filing Type: DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Status: Active
Original Filing Date: 05/29/2014

It is becoming confusing to determine who owns what...

Hash Buy is an additional LLC I created if we ever needed a subsidiary to hold anything, such as the facility we're working on purchasing. Although I've paid for it, it has no EIN associated with it, and has not been used for anything as of yet.

Coin Services LLC owns the "BuyAHash" trademark, not BTCI.

[Benny1985]

To Gleb Gamow / NotLambChop / IPOMagic / RiverBoatBTC:

I am not allowing further discussion on this offering by these accounts, or any alts that I can find. You have your own thread in which you can post whatever you like. I will continue to delete any and all posts you make here, as its very obvious what you are trying to do. If you don't like what I am doing, do not invest. If you believe I am scamming people, post in in your own thread to compile whatever ideas you like. I will continue to allow anyone else to post here.

[NotLambchop]

You don't understand how interweb works.  The trail of slime you left behind you can't be deleted.  You have done this once too many times, and now both you and your scamming brother are getting fed to the lions for the amusement of all.

Just like REAL Christians.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

Nah, this is not going away.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

Lol, stackin' that cheddar!


http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

Lol, like clockwork!  Teh Twins are coverin' their tracks
A bit too late, but it's the thought that counts, amiright?



...But Teh Tiem Machine Nevar 4gits!! 
https://web.archive.org/web/20110828180209/http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

...
I dono but maybe I read the news to much, but every company I have ever seen go public has never hide a key player unless something is a foul. This should be interesting if they can produce a Mr. John K Freeman, maybe they will do like tocobell and find all the Ronald McDonalds bwhaha.

Pretty sure if it was Ok'd with the SEC all parties in the IPO would be listed... like directors. So can we see what you sent the SEC?

Mr. Freeman is not only a key player, he is the asset issuer.  What's more, there are many "John K. Freeman[ s]," but the issuer is not "K," but rather "Kenton," limiting us to a much narrower set



https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit

@RiverBoatBTC:  will post the fraudulent SEC filing in a sec.

Here:
 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

And this is John Kenton Freeman, the d00d you're "investing" in:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

OIC, ty.  You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below:

,,,
Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities?

Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit]prospectus HK company registration[/edit] and some old arrest records--nothing else.  Is this the same Mr. Freeman?


*edited

[theMiracle]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Embarrassing?  You bet.  

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

07-29 12:10:35  15 @ .022
07-29 12:10:36  27 @ .022
07-29 12:13:35  2 @ .022
07-29 12:14:43  50 @ .022
07-29 12:18:01  45 @ .022
07-29 12:18:40  10 @ .022
07-29 12:18:44  3 @ .022
07-29 12:19:22  5 @ .022
07-29 12:22:49  8 @ .022
07-29 12:27:26  1 @ .022
07-29 12:27:36  2 @ .022
07-29 12:49:47  1 @ .022
07-29 12:54:26  1 @ .022
07-29 12:56:25  5 @ .022
07-29 13:01:21  8 @ .022
07-29 13:21:34  1 @ .022
07-29 13:29:33  3 @ .022
07-29 13:32:13  1 @ .022
07-29 13:47:31  3 @ .022
07-29 15:37:41  20 @ .022
07-29 16:27:59  3 @ .022
07-29 16:43:20  1 @ .022
07-29 18:24:45  1 @ .022
07-29 19:37:47  1 @ .022
07-30 02:41:53  2 @ .022
07-30 02:58:28  1 @ .022
07-30 03:36:57  2 @ .022
07-30 05:24:42  2 @ .022
07-30 05:27:34  2 @ .022
07-30 05:45:38  2 @ .022
07-30 07:01:37  10 @ .022
07-30 12:43:36  2 @ .022 <==update!


Looks like all of the greater fools are already spoken for

@Benny:  Why did you delete this?  This info is publicly available through Havelock's API.  My script simply cleans up it up to make it readable.

Another post of mine that was deleted by another totally legit guy, Mr. Kenneth Slaughter of Active Mining, in HIS self-moderated thread (just noticed it in my messages):

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

Development board running here:
Early Prototype Development Board

Specs?

+1. all i see is relatively small hashrate with some crazy variance going on - looks like vardiff>1024 using <500GH

That is what you should see, this is our first prototype board off of the line.  We are building more.

Post some pics.  Tell people whose chips you're using.  Thanks.

[Gleb Gamow]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Embarrassing?  You bet. 

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

07-29 12:10:35  15 @ .022
07-29 12:10:36  27 @ .022
07-29 12:13:35  2 @ .022
07-29 12:14:43  50 @ .022
07-29 12:18:01  45 @ .022
07-29 12:18:40  10 @ .022
07-29 12:18:44  3 @ .022
07-29 12:19:22  5 @ .022
07-29 12:22:49  8 @ .022
07-29 12:27:26  1 @ .022
07-29 12:27:36  2 @ .022
07-29 12:49:47  1 @ .022
07-29 12:54:26  1 @ .022
07-29 12:56:25  5 @ .022
07-29 13:01:21  8 @ .022
07-29 13:21:34  1 @ .022
07-29 13:29:33  3 @ .022
07-29 13:32:13  1 @ .022
07-29 13:47:31  3 @ .022
07-29 15:37:41  20 @ .022
07-29 16:27:59  3 @ .022
07-29 16:43:20  1 @ .022
07-29 18:24:45  1 @ .022
07-29 19:37:47  1 @ .022
07-30 02:41:53  2 @ .022
07-30 02:58:28  1 @ .022
07-30 03:36:57  2 @ .022
07-30 05:24:42  2 @ .022
07-30 05:27:34  2 @ .022
07-30 05:45:38  2 @ .022
07-30 07:01:37  10 @ .022

Looks like all of the greater fools are already spoken for

@Benny:  Why did you delete this?  This info is publicly available through Havelock's API.  My script simply cleans up it up to make it readable.

Another post of mine that was deleted by another totally legit guy, Mr. Kenneth Slaughter of Active Mining, in HIS self-moderated thread (just noticed it in my messages):

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic...

Development board running here:
Early Prototype Development Board

Specs?

+1. all i see is relatively small hashrate with some crazy variance going on - looks like vardiff>1024 using <500GH

That is what you should see, this is our first prototype board off of the line.  We are building more.

Post some pics.  Tell people whose chips you're using.  Thanks.

Better add theMiracle to your list, Benny, for he's quoting posts you're deleting.

Looks like this is going to be your new full time job - deleting posts. Best order some Red Bull from Joshua Zipkin, for it's goin' be a long one.

[runlinux]

Just report the posts. They have their own thread.

[NotLambchop]

I think it's a tempest in a teacup.  Only 23 shares total sold today, ~1/2 BTC.
Gifted panhandlers make more. 

[RiverBoatBTC]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

When did they win that auction? Cause the property is still listed on loopnet
http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/18254303/2150-N-COURT-ST-Circleville-OH

I am going to call the listing agent as well, glad I have a membership to loopnet

http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568

June 12th was the auction date? That puts it at almost 60 days out.


The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder.  The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event.

[RiverBoatBTC]

Talked to the people at the Auction finally, They said it is not a normal practice for them to extend the 30 days to close time.... care to explain? Or are you just going to delete this?

[Benny1985]

Talked to the people at the Auction finally, They said it is not a normal practice for them to extend the 30 days to close time.... care to explain? Or are you just going to delete this?

Did you talk to John Rodgers?