[Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More

[Gleb Gamow]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinopterygii

[1714954071]

1714954071

[Gleb Gamow]

Hey, guys. Can we call a truce on busting the balls of HASH and RENT?

I've read their entire Litecoin Forum thread, and the best I can come up with is a tiny handful of missteps that may, or may not be concerning, of which it's those that we've collectively beat with buggy whips.

To date, I don't believe there's been one disgruntle customer or investor of theirs.

I've come to this conclusion on my own accord sans speaking personally with no one, thus don't want be judge by fellow bitcoiners-in-arms, and the pleasure of your participation was all mine.

I'm sure if we hunt hard enough on this forum   we should have no problem finding bigger fish to deep fry.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: If at all possible, please show us something pertaining to John Kenton Freeman.

[Gleb Gamow]

Ironically, this truce has lasted longer than any of the ones involving the Gaza Strip of late.

[Haze]

Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze

[Kushedout]

You left out the other idiots name, NotLambchop.

btw, all 3 sock accounts are the same person.

Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze

[Gleb Gamow]

You left out the other idiots name, NotLambchop.

btw, all 3 sock accounts are the same person.

Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze

Btw, your wrong.... 

*You're*

Please learn how to spell before you start giving your "advice" on the legitimacy of HASH. Thanks and goodbye.

If I recall, their was a quasi-truce in place until somebody came along and starting hazing.

TBC, I'm not affiliated with any other account that has posted on RENT or HASH's threads.

Peace.

[NotLambchop]

Another deletion spree. 

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

You don't understand how interweb works.  The trail of slime you left behind you can't be deleted.  You have done this once too many times, and now both you and your scamming brother are getting fed to the lions for the amusement of all.

Just like REAL Christians.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Nah, this is not going away.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Lol, stackin' that cheddar!


http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

Lol, like clockwork!  Teh Twins are coverin' their tracks
A bit too late, but it's the thought that counts, amiright?



...But Teh Tiem Machine Nevar 4gits!! 
https://web.archive.org/web/20110828180209/http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

...
I dono but maybe I read the news to much, but every company I have ever seen go public has never hide a key player unless something is a foul. This should be interesting if they can produce a Mr. John K Freeman, maybe they will do like tocobell and find all the Ronald McDonalds bwhaha.

Pretty sure if it was Ok'd with the SEC all parties in the IPO would be listed... like directors. So can we see what you sent the SEC?

Mr. Freeman is not only a key player, he is the asset issuer.  What's more, there are many "John K. Freeman[ s]," but the issuer is not "K," but rather "Kenton," limiting us to a much narrower set



https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit

@RiverBoatBTC:  will post the fraudulent SEC filing in a sec.

Here:
 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

[/quote]

[Sahtor]

Havelock frontpage is showing a Youtube-video about HASH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8gicpVv7m4

That video is advertising a website
http://hashwithus.com/

Is BAH entering into Cloud-hashing market? The website says we'll get more info next week.

[Benny1985]

HashWithUs is slated to be our investor portal, with PR/News, along with dividend information, and company info where needed.

Re: Cloud mining, its something we're looking into, as we do have a few people interested in that. But the primary focus has been, and continues to be to build a world-class hardware resales facility, while building infrastructure for mining (and eventually leveraging for cloud contracts when we broker a few agreements).

[NotLambchop]

Breaking news:

After merely two weeks of brisk sales, Big Trends Capital Investment, a Hong Kong financial concern, has sold over 500 shares of its spectacular Havelock offering to eager Bitcoin finance enthusiasts.

This marks the 1% point of the firm's total projected sales.

On the other side of the globe, somewhere in rural Ohio, visionary financiers Benny and Branny jubilantly commemorated the momentous milestone.

[RiverBoatBTC]

9 More days till the death of hash? Or are they going to extend the offering?

[Sahtor]

There are some 10-50k usd unpaid dividends which would probably be used to setup the next group buy or reseller order. I'm sure Benny will find a place to make that coin work.

[Benny1985]

9 More days till the death of hash? Or are they going to extend the offering?

Given that we're going to import shares for previous shareholders, I don't think the offering is going to "Die". However, extension of the IPO remains to be seen. I believe Havelock typically allows those shares to float on the market @ IPO price.

[NotLambchop]

Edit: It gets better...

[IPO Magic]

No reason to panic, finance enthusiasts!   

[CoinsForTech]

Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?

[Korbman]

Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?

645 shares were sold on Havelock during the offering (BTC14.19). Once the Havelock IPO ended, I believe all previous shares (from their first offering on LitecoinTalk) were converted over, though someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[NotLambchop]

@CoinsForTech:

A shade over 1% (one percent) of the shares sold.

The price [understandably] tanked as soon as trading has started, with current highest bid being 50/50    @ ฿0.00220000 (exactly one tenths the Havelock IPO price).

The unsold shares were put up for sale, and can be seen at the bottom of the asks, here:


There wasn't much dumping, simply because there were never any bids.  The highest non-trivial (over 0.11BTC) current bid is


  ~Happy Investing!


P.S: If it's not obvious, offerings like this create DISASTROUS PR for Bitcoin, and are [at least partially] responsible for the floundering exchange rate.
Case in point:  The same people who black-mouthed and raged against me for calling out Active Mining are now posting this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=462370.msg8564894#msg8564894 <==don't click if you anger easily

[Benny1985]

Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?

645 shares were sold on Havelock during the offering (BTC14.19). Once the Havelock IPO ended, I believe all previous shares (from their first offering on LitecoinTalk) were converted over, though someone correct me if I'm wrong.

This is correct.

Additionally, I messaged all IPO buyers about this prior to the IPO closing. Since we've had a large number of shares that were unsold, we are giving them additional shares to compensate for the price dropping. So if this price holds, we'll be looking at giving them an extra 3.25 shares for each share purchased during the IPO.

[NotLambchop]

...So if this price holds, we'll be looking at giving them an extra 3.25 shares for each share purchased during the IPO.

Don't you mean an extra 9 shares?  The highest bid is .0022, so each share must be augmented with a minimum of 9 more shares to bring it up to I*cough*PO price.
Check ur math.