Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 04:42:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mining bandwith  (Read 1422 times)
bobsmoke (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 23, 2014, 09:59:36 PM
 #1

Hello,

Does anyone know how much bandwith a miner uses when mining into a pool?

thank you
bobsmoke
1715186525
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715186525

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715186525
Reply with quote  #2

1715186525
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715186525
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715186525

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715186525
Reply with quote  #2

1715186525
Report to moderator
1715186525
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715186525

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715186525
Reply with quote  #2

1715186525
Report to moderator
byt411
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 24, 2014, 02:05:58 AM
 #2

Very little. And I mean very very little, so little you shouldn't be worried about it.
Rabinovitch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076


BTCLife.global participant


View Profile
July 25, 2014, 08:58:01 AM
 #3

Yep. Judging by Winbox application (a tool for control and configure MikroTik routers), it's about very few kbps...

From Siberia with love! Hosting by Rabinovitch!
Fundraising for BOINC Farm
Пpoфeccиoнaльнo зaнимaюcь paзвёpтывaниeм фepм (ASIC, GPU, BURST, STORJ, Filecoin), oбopyдoвaниeм пoмeщeний для мaйнингa.
Chrithu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 25, 2014, 01:54:36 PM
 #4

For a reference: I have 2 Antminer U2s mining at 4 GH/s combined and they use 48 B/s up and 28 B/s down.

Bandwidth usage is really really small thanks to the stratum protocol.

zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 06:56:06 AM
 #5

48 bytes/s?  Uh, maybe if you use something that requires really high difficulty to count as a share..  But incoming data should still be just as high..

Anyway, Cudaminer bursted up to around 8kb/s upstream, w/ an average of around 1kb/s, probably.  I was using relatively low share difficulty, averaged maybe one every 3 seconds.
Chrithu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 09:02:25 AM
 #6

I know too little about the in depth details of how stratum works to know whether up and downstream should be equal or not. I just report the numbers that BFGMiner is showing for almost 3 months now.

The point still is that any state of the art DSL connection is more than sufficient to run a miner without having to upgrade. Heck you could even use ISDN or 56k modems for small time miners.

Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 05:14:12 PM
 #7

512k DSL should be fine, if you not hitting it with online gaming and downloads all the time. The average bandwidth usage is VERY low.

With a suitable share difficulty, which most pools will set automatically after detecting your hashrate, your bandwidth usage should be VERY low.


THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
bobsmoke (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:05:44 PM
 #8

Thank you all who answered .. very usefull!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!