Bitcoin is the 3rd revolution I'm living through
1st revolution was Personal Computer's which are now tablets and smartphones to many (1980's-2000's)
2nd revolution was The Net the age of instant free info (1990's-2000's)
3rd revolution was Digital Cryptocurrency (2010's-)
I honestly believe most here will be telling our grand kids about a thing we used to have called money that evil governments printed at will to fuel stupid wars.
They will ask, "gramps, how did you become so rich?"
You will say, "Because I SAW THE REVOLUTION COMING and put lots of worthless government notes into tech notes you call BITCOIN."
After you've been front lines in a couple of revolutions you start to see them coming.
BITCOIN is like the Internet and the personal computer. It is the NEXT revolution.
Bitcoin had four ten-fold growth bubbles:- $0.05 per bitcoin. The start.
- $0.50 per bitcoin. First tenfold bubble
- $5.00 per bitcoin. Next tenfold bubble
- $50.00 per bitcoin. Next tenfold bubble
- $500.00 per bitcoin. Our current bubble
Next bubbles:- $5,000 per bitcoin.
- $50,000 per bitcoin.
- $500,000 per bitcoin.
For $5,000 to happen you need ONLY 0.1% acceptance of world population for Bitcoin. We are at 0.01% now.
$50,000 is just 1% of Gross World Product by Bitcoin produces $50,000 bubble.
$500,000 per Bitcoin is just 10% Gross World Product by Bitcoin.
Can Bitcoin hit 10% growth of population?
Credit cards did and they reject 90% of the world.
Bitcoin rejects no one.
So Bitcoin will go in trade where Visa/Mastercard refuse to go.
So way over 10% of Gross World Product can eventually be Bitcoin
10% of Gross World Product is $8.5 trillion
Divide 12M coins into $8.5 trillion
$500,000 Bitcoin baby.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The original poster of this was not me. Full credit goes to
this guy "domainbrokers". I liked his post so much that I wanted to share it.
The problem with most peoples "math" on this subject is that they assume to many things as a constant and that these things all "line up" with each other and "will" happen.
It is all fine and dandy to claim if "X" happens then "Y" will follow and the price will be "Z". If the world actually worked like that all the time there would be a lot more people who are rich, but there isn't that many rich people. The other problem is the liquidity of it all. BTC won't be spent once it starts going higher and higher. If it really ever reaches 10K you will see hoarding like you wouldn't believe, the people who got in early will obviously get out of it at that point for the most part, you would legitimately be crazy not to. If you had 100 bitcoins and the price is 10,000 USD each that is 1,000,000 USD man. That is more than enough to put into stocks/retirement account and do whatever the hell you want for the rest of your life.
The other "issue" is that every single payment processor will go broke if this happens. You have to think about it like this. They have to now buy bitcoins for 500k for a full bitcoin in your example, what happens if bitcoin goes down by 80,000 USD in a week? they are going to have so much f-ing risk its not gonna be funny.
You need to think about this in more ways than what some theoretical math comes out.
The other problem people fall into is saying that BTC must be worth X because of how much Y there is in total USD. No, it doesn't have to be like that and does not directly work that way. Most of the volume is just people trading back and forth on exchanges and not buying real items. GDP is not trading back and forth on exchanges, it is Gross Domestic Product, which DOES NOT have stock trading factored into it. It is Revenue - cost dude. Equating GDP to stocks is wrong. Equating stocks to BTC is right. Therefore equating GDP to BTC is wrong.
#themoreyouknow