Bitcoin Forum
April 02, 2020, 07:47:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 137 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [SSD] Sonic - 1st TOR with functional anon send - Steganography based Anon App  (Read 284354 times)
tx42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:26:39 PM
 #821

Ok, I'm @CryptoRussian on twitter and C-CEX asked me to look into coin source to help with analyzing problem.  

I haven't found something suspicious or intentional in the code, at least where I looked, but bug certainly exists. C-CEX used rpc call to get new addresses for deposits(just like any other exchange) and after migration to the new version(with instructions provided by the developer), wallet started to behave strangely, instead of generating new addresses for deposits - it returned previously used addresses from the key pool. I'm waiting to hear developer explanations on this issue, I presume migration wasn't really tested extensively and there are some other issues in the code that can blow up eventually.

C-CEX had their mistake with assumptions about the addresses being unique, well, call to getnewaddress assumes that you get new address instead of old one. Unfortunately this lesson wasn't free.

As for price and loosing your coins.. well, developers should test features before releasing them, traders/miners should expect to loose coins due to bugs in code if the wallet has problems, nothing new.

You are full of shit. Try again.

Code:
14:23:30
getnewaddress
14:23:30
scjDCfCAFwhPh5CrrntZM4n2irM3EXmKWp
14:23:32
getnewaddress
14:23:32
seF4pdfCKwH4kppNnJowbuRSh3ZkH34FAX
14:23:36
getnewaddress 'account'
14:23:36
sRFS3cT1qmAYtsVg5miGaQia6skRJjdZA9
14:23:39
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:23:39
saYKAi5SgvwZvWJDSVqavarBpzHs8QwYj5
14:27:13
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:27:13
shFxZ2D7dpULoos2bd9BU7TZ7yUfzLkEV6


█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
..EARN FREE BREAKOUT COINS SIG CAMPAIGN LIVE !!
█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
1585856860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585856860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585856860
Reply with quote  #2

1585856860
Report to moderator
1585856860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585856860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585856860
Reply with quote  #2

1585856860
Report to moderator
Best Rates For Exchanging Cryptocurrency Buy Crypto With Credit Card Smooth Exchange Multiple E-Payment Systems Check Now Check Now
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1585856860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585856860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585856860
Reply with quote  #2

1585856860
Report to moderator
1585856860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585856860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585856860
Reply with quote  #2

1585856860
Report to moderator
1585856860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585856860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585856860
Reply with quote  #2

1585856860
Report to moderator
c-cex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001


CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com


View Profile WWW
September 24, 2014, 08:27:13 PM
 #822

Ok, I'm @CryptoRussian on twitter and C-CEX asked me to look into coin source to help with analyzing problem. 

I haven't found something suspicious or intentional in the code, at least where I looked, but bug certainly exists. C-CEX used rpc call to get new addresses for deposits(just like any other exchange) and after migration to the new version(with instructions provided by the developer), wallet started to behave strangely, instead of generating new addresses for deposits - it returned previously used addresses from the key pool. I'm waiting to hear developer explanations on this issue, I presume migration wasn't really tested extensively and there are some other issues in the code that can blow eventually.

C-CEX had their mistake with assumptions about the addresses being unique, well, call to getnewaddress assumes that you get new address instead of old one. Unfortunately this lesson wasn't free.

As for price and loosing your coins.. well, developers should test features before releasing them, traders/miners should expect to loose coins due to bugs in code if the wallet has problems, nothing new.

No contact has been made. And why is C-Cex the only exchange to have experienced this issue? Please enlighten me as to where the issue would be so I can fix it if it does infact exist

Not true. We chat yesterday on skype and today I wrote several times to You - You did not respond.

CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com
ahmedshawezi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:29:30 PM
 #823

Haven't we been here before with exchanges blaming code i.e. Mark Karpeles.

tx42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:31:23 PM
 #824

Ok, I'm @CryptoRussian on twitter and C-CEX asked me to look into coin source to help with analyzing problem. 

I haven't found something suspicious or intentional in the code, at least where I looked, but bug certainly exists. C-CEX used rpc call to get new addresses for deposits(just like any other exchange) and after migration to the new version(with instructions provided by the developer), wallet started to behave strangely, instead of generating new addresses for deposits - it returned previously used addresses from the key pool. I'm waiting to hear developer explanations on this issue, I presume migration wasn't really tested extensively and there are some other issues in the code that can blow eventually.

C-CEX had their mistake with assumptions about the addresses being unique, well, call to getnewaddress assumes that you get new address instead of old one. Unfortunately this lesson wasn't free.

As for price and loosing your coins.. well, developers should test features before releasing them, traders/miners should expect to loose coins due to bugs in code if the wallet has problems, nothing new.

No contact has been made. And why is C-Cex the only exchange to have experienced this issue? Please enlighten me as to where the issue would be so I can fix it if it does infact exist

Not true. We chat yesterday on skype and today I wrote several times to You - You did not respond.

If you lose coins at C-CEX it is your own fault.

█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
..EARN FREE BREAKOUT COINS SIG CAMPAIGN LIVE !!
█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
argakiig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 482
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:32:22 PM
 #825

RE C-CEX, Would you like to see the chat between them and I?
tx42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:32:28 PM
 #826

Haven't we been here before with exchanges blaming code i.e. Mark Karpeles.

GOXed

C-CEXed

█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
..EARN FREE BREAKOUT COINS SIG CAMPAIGN LIVE !!
█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
godda04
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:34:32 PM
 #827

LordPiccolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:36:32 PM
 #828

RE C-CEX, Would you like to see the chat between them and I?

I suppose someone admitting they screwed up would be something. We are getting a small amount of btc back which is something.

As for the person who keeps saying it's our faults for using c-cex, maybe he is right but as a customer, i should be able to purchase any coin from any exchange and not have to worry about whether i'm going to lose them due to it not being my fault.

                                 
     ▄███████████████████████   
    █████████████████████████   
    █████████████████████████   
    ███████           ███████   
    ███████          ▄███████   
    ███████   ▄▄▄▄███████████   
    ████████████████████████▀   
    ███████████████████▀▀▀       
    █████████████▀▀▀             
    ███████▀▀                   
    █████▀▀                     
    ▀▀▀                         
                                 
.phore.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
xD E L I V E R I N G   B L O C K C H A I N   T E C H N O L O G Yxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxT O   T H E   R E A L   W O R L Dxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
..Telegram....
..Facebook...
..Instagram...
..Youtube...
..LinkedIn...
..Twitter......
..Discord...
..Reddit.....
..Github.....
(██████████████████████████████
xphore.ioxx

██████████████████████████████████████
)
pm1978
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 100


stealthcoin.com


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:37:11 PM
 #829

SONIC Supporters RT !

https://twitter.com/sadochismo/status/514872632681181184/photo/1


STEALTHCOIN | XST | stealthcoin.com
BLOCKNET : THE INTERNET OF BLOCKCHAINS https://blocknet.co/ | A DECENTRALISED EXCHANGE THAT IS 100% TRUSTLESS.
argakiig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 482
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:37:28 PM
 #830

http://pastebin.com/TDy4WQ5P

for your enjoyment. Every Correspondence between C-Cex and I. I can screenshot any part if you don't believe it.
CryptoTV
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:41:18 PM
 #831

Still getting this error for line 557 and cant compile on linux.

/root/Sonicscrewdriver/src/rpcrawtransaction.cpp:557: undefined reference to `decryptsonictxt(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >&)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Sonicd] Error 1


Dev, can you please address this call in rpcrawtransaction.cpp so that I can compile your wallet.   

got hacked all my coins gone from the blackjack sites.  Thanks jerk.
argakiig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 482
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:43:02 PM
 #832

Still getting this error for line 557 and cant compile on linux.

/root/Sonicscrewdriver/src/rpcrawtransaction.cpp:557: undefined reference to `decryptsonictxt(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >&)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Sonicd] Error 1


Dev, can you please address this call in rpcrawtransaction.cpp so that I can compile your wallet.   

That is because the make file is not fully setup yet. its still missing headers.
argakiig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 482
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:43:39 PM
Last edit: September 24, 2014, 08:57:41 PM by argakiig
 #833



Also if you find a bug feel free to post it, I will gladly admit if I am wrong and fix it.

CryptoTV
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:50:59 PM
 #834

Still getting this error for line 557 and cant compile on linux.

/root/Sonicscrewdriver/src/rpcrawtransaction.cpp:557: undefined reference to `decryptsonictxt(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >&)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Sonicd] Error 1


Dev, can you please address this call in rpcrawtransaction.cpp so that I can compile your wallet.   

That is because the make file is not fully setup yet. its still missing headers.

OK, well when it's done, I'll open up a blackjack game here for sonic.

got hacked all my coins gone from the blackjack sites.  Thanks jerk.
drizzle2405
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
September 24, 2014, 08:53:20 PM
 #835

What's the coin count that was double spent and perma lost?...  Value of SSD should be going up!!!  Less coins in circulation...

boopy265420
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1005


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:53:27 PM
 #836

http://pastebin.com/TDy4WQ5P

for your enjoyment. Every Correspondence between C-Cex and I. I can screenshot any part if you don't believe it.

After having a look at the chat between both of you (Dev and c-cex) everything is very clear the fault is of that from C-Cex as he showed greed too in mode of staking. He is (C-cex)that the responsible for this loss.
ExD
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:54:01 PM
 #837


You are full of shit. Try again.

Code:
14:23:30
getnewaddress
14:23:30
scjDCfCAFwhPh5CrrntZM4n2irM3EXmKWp
14:23:32
getnewaddress
14:23:32
seF4pdfCKwH4kppNnJowbuRSh3ZkH34FAX
14:23:36
getnewaddress 'account'
14:23:36
sRFS3cT1qmAYtsVg5miGaQia6skRJjdZA9
14:23:39
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:23:39
saYKAi5SgvwZvWJDSVqavarBpzHs8QwYj5
14:27:13
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:27:13
shFxZ2D7dpULoos2bd9BU7TZ7yUfzLkEV6


Your example is not relevant to the case.

Wallet after migration returned addresses that were used before migration, for example:
sc7zK5PrZUbTTfM2ZKrQ3Q6rnxmLtDr858
scSHt3SGSVFuZP6aBP5UiUzYHfWBy5hu7a

After migration and salvaging wallet, it returned the same addresses, presumably in the same order, my bet that's bug is related to key pool queue, it's developer job to determinate exact cause, I'm not going to look through every step to find exact line of code which cause this. My time isn't free and I'm not going to waste it on this, thanks. If someone has better explanation why it was happened and why addresses were reused, you can post your version of events.

argakiig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 482
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:57:57 PM
 #838


You are full of shit. Try again.

Code:
14:23:30
getnewaddress
14:23:30
scjDCfCAFwhPh5CrrntZM4n2irM3EXmKWp
14:23:32
getnewaddress
14:23:32
seF4pdfCKwH4kppNnJowbuRSh3ZkH34FAX
14:23:36
getnewaddress 'account'
14:23:36
sRFS3cT1qmAYtsVg5miGaQia6skRJjdZA9
14:23:39
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:23:39
saYKAi5SgvwZvWJDSVqavarBpzHs8QwYj5
14:27:13
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:27:13
shFxZ2D7dpULoos2bd9BU7TZ7yUfzLkEV6


Your example is not relevant to the case.

Wallet after migration returned addresses that were used before migration, for example:
sc7zK5PrZUbTTfM2ZKrQ3Q6rnxmLtDr858
scSHt3SGSVFuZP6aBP5UiUzYHfWBy5hu7a

After migration and salvaging wallet, it returned the same addresses, presumably in the same order, my bet that's bug is related to key pool queue, it's developer job to determinate exact cause. If someone has better explanation why it was happened and why addresses were reused, you can post your version of events.

Also if you find a bug feel free to post it, I will gladly admit if I am wrong and fix it.

I think I know what would have happened though.

As you can see in the pastebin the wallet was corrupted and the most recent backup they had was 8 days prior. When reverting to this backup the keypool was taken back to the previous state. This would allow addresses that had already been assigned to be reassigned.
cryptodruti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:59:20 PM
 #839


You are full of shit. Try again.

Code:
14:23:30
getnewaddress
14:23:30
scjDCfCAFwhPh5CrrntZM4n2irM3EXmKWp
14:23:32
getnewaddress
14:23:32
seF4pdfCKwH4kppNnJowbuRSh3ZkH34FAX
14:23:36
getnewaddress 'account'
14:23:36
sRFS3cT1qmAYtsVg5miGaQia6skRJjdZA9
14:23:39
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:23:39
saYKAi5SgvwZvWJDSVqavarBpzHs8QwYj5
14:27:13
getnewaddress 'account2'
14:27:13
shFxZ2D7dpULoos2bd9BU7TZ7yUfzLkEV6


Your example is not relevant to the case.

Wallet after migration returned addresses that were used before migration, for example:
sc7zK5PrZUbTTfM2ZKrQ3Q6rnxmLtDr858
scSHt3SGSVFuZP6aBP5UiUzYHfWBy5hu7a

After migration and salvaging wallet, it returned the same addresses, presumably in the same order, my bet that's bug is related to key pool queue, it's developer job to determinate exact cause. If someone has better explanation why it was happened and why addresses were reused, you can post your version of events.
OK, fucking c-cex everyone that knows anything about cryptos knows that your exchange is shit, and this isn't the first time you have been accused of stealing peoples coins. No one is going to believe anything you say because there has been countless claims of you stealing costumers coins in the past (and deleting their accounts to try to cover it up).
crazywack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 09:01:30 PM
 #840

http://pastebin.com/TDy4WQ5P

for your enjoyment. Every Correspondence between C-Cex and I. I can screenshot any part if you don't believe it.


Got em arg! Not to mention staking customer coins! Lol wouldn't expect anything less from them....

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 137 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!