yochdog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 01, 2012, 04:32:51 AM Last edit: June 01, 2012, 04:58:48 AM by yochdog |
|
on of my rigs:
4,600 MH/s
955 Watts at the wall
4.81 MH/w
3x BFL singles 2X 7970
I run dual hex-core XEONS, so that takes the efficiency waaaaay down.
the 7970's are dialed in at 3.08 MH/w though....which is awesome.
|
I am a trusted trader! Ask Inaba, Luo Demin, Vanderbleek, Sannyasi, Episking, Miner99er, Isepick, Amazingrando, Cablez, ColdHardMetal, Dextryn, MB300sd, Robocoder, gnar1ta$ and many others!
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
June 01, 2012, 12:31:42 PM |
|
You go around adding BFLs and video cards to everything you can touch, don't you yochdog. lol
|
|
|
|
yochdog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 01, 2012, 01:18:21 PM |
|
You go around adding BFLs and video cards to everything you can touch, don't you yochdog. lol
I am hitting it hard while I can!
|
I am a trusted trader! Ask Inaba, Luo Demin, Vanderbleek, Sannyasi, Episking, Miner99er, Isepick, Amazingrando, Cablez, ColdHardMetal, Dextryn, MB300sd, Robocoder, gnar1ta$ and many others!
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2012, 04:41:32 PM |
|
Linksys (cisco) e3000 Rosewill 7 port USB hub Rosewill 650W PSU 2x BFL singles 155W 1650MH/s 10.6MH/W Am I not welcome here anymore? I thought each BFL was 80W each...how is your system less than 160? i did a killawatt on the bfl's when i first go tthem. it was under80.
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2012, 05:18:23 PM |
|
Linksys (cisco) e3000 Rosewill 7 port USB hub Rosewill 650W PSU 2x BFL singles 155W 1650MH/s 10.6MH/W Am I not welcome here anymore? I thought each BFL was 80W each...how is your system less than 160? i did a killawatt on the bfl's when i first go tthem. it was under80. Thanks. What firmware was that running? I also found this thread by P_shep. It appears he's using an ATX PSU to power the Singles, which is more efficient. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=76685.0
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2012, 05:23:51 PM |
|
Linksys (cisco) e3000 Rosewill 7 port USB hub Rosewill 650W PSU 2x BFL singles 155W 1650MH/s 10.6MH/W Am I not welcome here anymore? I thought each BFL was 80W each...how is your system less than 160? i did a killawatt on the bfl's when i first go tthem. it was under80. Thanks. What firmware was that running? I also found this thread by P_shep. It appears he's using an ATX PSU to power the Singles, which is more efficient. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=76685.0firmware..? no idea. got them hashing, left them alone. as long as the heat is under 59C they get 826Mh each (2) I am waiting on cables from : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
June 07, 2012, 08:31:47 PM |
|
I'll update this now:
Linksys (cisco) e3000 Rosewill 7 port USB hub Rosewill 650W PSU 6x BFL singles
480W 5029MH/s
10.5MH/W
|
|
|
|
Mousepotato (OP)
|
|
June 07, 2012, 09:39:16 PM |
|
No more mining for me. I make roughly 1850 MH/s worth of BTC per week now, @ 0 Watts. Suck it, FPGA/ASICs
|
Mousepotato
|
|
|
legolouman
|
|
June 07, 2012, 09:52:34 PM |
|
No more mining for me. I make roughly 1850 MH/s worth of BTC per week now, @ 0 Watts. Suck it, FPGA/ASICs Investing heavily?
|
If you love me, you'd give me a Satoshi! BTC - 1MSzGKh5znbrcEF2qTrtrWBm4ydH5eT49f LTC - LYeJrmYQQvt6gRQxrDz66XTwtkdodx9udz
|
|
|
SamHa1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2012, 12:28:17 AM |
|
370 Watts @ ~5.2Gh/s = FPGA4TW!
|
|
|
|
Tomatocage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
|
|
June 09, 2012, 08:24:21 AM |
|
0 Watts @ ~5.5Gh/s = PPTFTW!
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
June 09, 2012, 12:35:04 PM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 09, 2012, 02:45:28 PM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
Because as a GUIDELINE, 10MHs/W will be more profitable than 1MHs/W. I'm sure you know this, so please stop nitpicking.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
June 10, 2012, 06:02:32 AM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
Because as a GUIDELINE, 10MHs/W will be more profitable than 1MHs/W. I'm sure you know this, so please stop nitpicking. what? 90% or more of the posts in this thread are listing better efficiency by lowering overall output where is this guideline you speak of?
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 10, 2012, 10:19:43 PM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
Because as a GUIDELINE, 10MHs/W will be more profitable than 1MHs/W. I'm sure you know this, so please stop nitpicking. what? 90% or more of the posts in this thread are listing better efficiency by lowering overall output where is this guideline you speak of? I am pretty sure the guideline he speaks of is common sense. 10 is better then 1 if your looking for more of something.
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
Phraust
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
Mostly Harmless...
|
|
June 10, 2012, 10:54:37 PM |
|
Just got a kill-a-watt and measured my usage. 860w, with an average around 8,552 mh. So it's about 9.94 mh/w 10 BFLs running off of a corsair ax1200 Mac Mini Server And this is while cpu mining for litecoin as well (35 kh).
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
June 13, 2012, 08:36:46 AM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
Because as a GUIDELINE, 10MHs/W will be more profitable than 1MHs/W. I'm sure you know this, so please stop nitpicking. what? 90% or more of the posts in this thread are listing better efficiency by lowering overall output where is this guideline you speak of? I am pretty sure the guideline he speaks of is common sense. 10 is better then 1 if your looking for more of something. what? 10 apples is better than 1 apple, yes. So one bawzz super elite 200wpm typist costs you $20 an hour to employ as a medical transcriptionist... you can outsource to India and employ four 100wpm typists there for same price. first is more efficient, second gets you more money
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 13, 2012, 12:44:11 PM |
|
why is everyone talking about how much watts such and such pulls? that isn't most efficient
most efficient is what makes you the most money
sometimes i get the feeling that at least a good quarter of the people here get x amt of dollars a month and think theyre making a profit, even though their electricity costs + equipment depreciation is 2x
Because as a GUIDELINE, 10MHs/W will be more profitable than 1MHs/W. I'm sure you know this, so please stop nitpicking. what? 90% or more of the posts in this thread are listing better efficiency by lowering overall output where is this guideline you speak of? I am pretty sure the guideline he speaks of is common sense. 10 is better then 1 if your looking for more of something. what? 10 apples is better than 1 apple, yes. So one bawzz super elite 200wpm typist costs you $20 an hour to employ as a medical transcriptionist... you can outsource to India and employ four 100wpm typists there for same price. first is more efficient, second gets you more money Both of your analogies doen't make any sense, because that's not what ANYONE in this thread is posting. Almost everyone in here is posting (total product gained / total cost of obtaining product), which, in your annalogy, would be wpm/$. 200wpm/$20 (one uber typist) is 10wpm/$. 400wpm/$20 (4 typist at same money) gets you 20wpm/$. Second is more efficient, AND gets you more money. See the correlation? The two are the same. In our case, we're dealing with MHs/W, instead of wpm/$. Also, 10 apples are better than 1. Yes. However, buying 10 apples per $ is more cost EFFICIENT than 1 apple per $, which is exactly what mining efficiency is all about.
|
|
|
|
|