Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 10:42:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: False Advertising Power Supply Efficiency  (Read 1395 times)
miner_49er (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 10:52:03 AM
Last edit: September 05, 2014, 02:25:46 PM by miner_49er
 #1

    User sidehack is selling breakout boards for server power supplies and complete kits including the power supply / board / wiring.  He sells them on the forum and through his website 'gekkoscience'

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=503423.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=379677.0

One of his often repeated selling points is that the power supplies he sells are rated for "90% efficiency".  Testing shows that in reality they operate at around 82% efficiency  which makes them worse than 80 Plus Bronze yet he is advertising a spec that makes people think they are equivalent to 80 Plus Gold.  It's a complete lie but most people don't have the equipment to actually test so it is easy to make a false claim and not be called on it.  He apparently has duped a lot of people into buying these based on his efficiency claims if you look through the thread.

Quote from: sidehack
They are rated to provide 62A at 12V at 90% efficiency.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=379677.msg4071127#msg4071127

Quote from: sidehack
- >90% efficiency across most of the load range

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=503423.0

Quote from: sidehack
reliably put out 750W all day every day at 91% efficiency

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=503423.msg5563692#msg5563692
1715510570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715510570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715510570
Reply with quote  #2

1715510570
Report to moderator
1715510570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715510570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715510570
Reply with quote  #2

1715510570
Report to moderator
1715510570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715510570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715510570
Reply with quote  #2

1715510570
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1849

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 06:38:03 PM
 #2

How many units have you tested? Is your 82% based off a statistical mean of samplings or a single data point? If you like I can set up an adjustable dummy load and some AC metering to get an accurate sample of in/out efficiency numbers across the load range from a dozen or so random PSUs for a bit of rigor.

I was basing the efficiency estimation off the 80Plus certification for the model PSU as found here: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/DELL%20INC_Z750P-00_750W_SO-81_80+_Report.pdf
The indicated form factor is different but the manufacturer, model number and all other specifications are the same so I assume it's the same design/circuitry in a different package, which is not uncommon.

As far as anecdotal evidence goes (and I might ask bobsag3 to confirm this), when Minersource started shifting their hosted units to the Dell Z750P and our boards, they reported a noticeable drop in power consumption over the ATX PSUs they'd been using up to that point (as well as increased reliability). I'd think a large-scale hosting facility would have mentioned sometime in the last six months if their power bill had gone up 10%.

If it's desired that I set up some testing, I'll try to find the time to do so and get some good data for the community rather than relying on the evidence of customer feedback and official documentation. If it turns out that one of the primary selling points for these boards is disingenuous then I guess we have a problem.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 07:48:52 PM
 #3

How many units have you tested? Is your 82% based off a statistical mean of samplings or a single data point? If you like I can set up an adjustable dummy load and some AC metering to get an accurate sample of in/out efficiency numbers across the load range from a dozen or so random PSUs for a bit of rigor.

I was basing the efficiency estimation off the 80Plus certification for the model PSU as found here: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/DELL%20INC_Z750P-00_750W_SO-81_80+_Report.pdf
The indicated form factor is different but the manufacturer, model number and all other specifications are the same so I assume it's the same design/circuitry in a different package, which is not uncommon.

As far as anecdotal evidence goes (and I might ask bobsag3 to confirm this), when Minersource started shifting their hosted units to the Dell Z750P and our boards, they reported a noticeable drop in power consumption over the ATX PSUs they'd been using up to that point (as well as increased reliability). I'd think a large-scale hosting facility would have mentioned sometime in the last six months if their power bill had gone up 10%.

If it's desired that I set up some testing, I'll try to find the time to do so and get some good data for the community rather than relying on the evidence of customer feedback and official documentation. If it turns out that one of the primary selling points for these boards is disingenuous then I guess we have a problem.

I will confirm my eff numbers, although that is at 220V, and only on some supplies, some of these 2nd hand 750's barely work, and seem to have much lower eff's. This is across 100s of PSUs and boards.
miner_49er (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 04:27:00 PM
 #4

How many units have you tested? Is your 82% based off a statistical mean of samplings or a single data point? If you like I can set up an adjustable dummy load and some AC metering to get an accurate sample of in/out efficiency numbers across the load range from a dozen or so random PSUs for a bit of rigor.

I tested several from different sources because I was confused by my initial result and wanted to verify.  To be clear I'm not saying that 82% is the gospel but I'm saying that of the several I tested none of them where even close to 90% they were all in the low 80's which is very far from the claimed 90-91.  Not only that, but, relative to every other supply I tested these were hands down the absolute worst.  No amount of statistical variation can explain that away.

I was basing the efficiency estimation off the 80Plus certification for the model PSU as found here: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/DELL%20INC_Z750P-00_750W_SO-81_80+_Report.pdf
The indicated form factor is different but the manufacturer, model number and all other specifications are the same so I assume it's the same design/circuitry in a different package, which is not uncommon.

Those are clearly _not_ the same supply.  The photo alone shows that.  Dell reuses model numbers across generations of equipment.  Did you do even a cursory test to verify?  Seems like a case of ignorance is bliss.

As far as anecdotal evidence goes (and I might ask bobsag3 to confirm this), when Minersource started shifting their hosted units to the Dell Z750P and our boards, they reported a noticeable drop in power consumption over the ATX PSUs they'd been using up to that point (as well as increased reliability). I'd think a large-scale hosting facility would have mentioned sometime in the last six months if their power bill had gone up 10%.

Without knowing the efficiency rating of the supplies they were using saying their power bill went down is meaningless even as anecdotal evidence.

If it's desired that I set up some testing, I'll try to find the time to do so and get some good data for the community rather than relying on the evidence of customer feedback and official documentation. If it turns out that one of the primary selling points for these boards is disingenuous then I guess we have a problem.

I've already decided to go a different route so I don't care what you do but you can't honestly continue to claim those supplies are 90% efficient if you ever believed that to begin with.   

With as far off as these supplies are anyone can verify what I'm saying generally by comparing the Z750P to a name brand 80Plus Gold rated PSU using a simple killawatt meter using a miner that draws 300-400 watts as a test load.
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1849

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 05:23:48 PM
 #5

I'd still like to see some quantitative data to back your claim. Additionally, can you recommend an alternative with a similar power output and price range?

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
September 07, 2014, 03:24:41 AM
 #6

How many units have you tested? Is your 82% based off a statistical mean of samplings or a single data point? If you like I can set up an adjustable dummy load and some AC metering to get an accurate sample of in/out efficiency numbers across the load range from a dozen or so random PSUs for a bit of rigor.

I tested several from different sources because I was confused by my initial result and wanted to verify.  To be clear I'm not saying that 82% is the gospel but I'm saying that of the several I tested none of them where even close to 90% they were all in the low 80's which is very far from the claimed 90-91.  Not only that, but, relative to every other supply I tested these were hands down the absolute worst.  No amount of statistical variation can explain that away.

I was basing the efficiency estimation off the 80Plus certification for the model PSU as found here: http://www.plugloadsolutions.com/psu_reports/DELL%20INC_Z750P-00_750W_SO-81_80+_Report.pdf
The indicated form factor is different but the manufacturer, model number and all other specifications are the same so I assume it's the same design/circuitry in a different package, which is not uncommon.

Those are clearly _not_ the same supply.  The photo alone shows that.  Dell reuses model numbers across generations of equipment.  Did you do even a cursory test to verify?  Seems like a case of ignorance is bliss.

As far as anecdotal evidence goes (and I might ask bobsag3 to confirm this), when Minersource started shifting their hosted units to the Dell Z750P and our boards, they reported a noticeable drop in power consumption over the ATX PSUs they'd been using up to that point (as well as increased reliability). I'd think a large-scale hosting facility would have mentioned sometime in the last six months if their power bill had gone up 10%.

Without knowing the efficiency rating of the supplies they were using saying their power bill went down is meaningless even as anecdotal evidence.

If it's desired that I set up some testing, I'll try to find the time to do so and get some good data for the community rather than relying on the evidence of customer feedback and official documentation. If it turns out that one of the primary selling points for these boards is disingenuous then I guess we have a problem.

I've already decided to go a different route so I don't care what you do but you can't honestly continue to claim those supplies are 90% efficient if you ever believed that to begin with.   

With as far off as these supplies are anyone can verify what I'm saying generally by comparing the Z750P to a name brand 80Plus Gold rated PSU using a simple killawatt meter using a miner that draws 300-400 watts as a test load.


ZP750W on both 110 and 220 @ 350W load (1 S3) consumes ~10W less at the wall than my HX850.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!