i am not overly against anything you have said but i have some thoughts..
you said..
the scam will begin to subside and the forum will start to get a bit cleaner and more coherent .
then you mentioned this grouping of sorts..
iii) Fresh, this means a coin going in a whole new direction
this will be a highly sought after group to be labelled as so.. that make me think one thing.
is this new direction GOOD or BAD ?
and here lies the debate and the vast majority of ALL the problems that persist in the Altcoin scene.
That right there is the root cause of so much drama / infighting and so called Trolling and FUD'ing.
The reality is we all don't get along and agree with what is a step forward OR backwards..
i thought when Memory Coin came out from FreeTrade his coin voting system was the most clever piece of coding scamminess i witnessed in all of crypto
and i believe that is what you are referring to earlier..
partly because of how he implemented it, advertised it and used it ..not just the code itself alone.
It's worth pointing out that FreeTrade abandoned his Memory Coin when he lost "majority control" and publicly stated the coin was over and done
effectively killing it dead and then way later coming back for a MemoryCoin 2.0 launch later and seemingly dropping it again..
jerking investors around like a yo yo..
When it comes to crypto scams Memory Coin was the best and most creative i ever seen.. i was pretty impressed how he launched
the coin and said nothing to anyone except a small line or two mentioning it in passing on his ANN topic
and in the coins wallet there was no word about "voting" in anyway shape or form anywhere at all !
So... there was no info provided on launch or soon after on HOW to vote or what any of the voting stuff meant in the slightest
and while he sat quietly he kicked back accumulating the majority of mined coins as i could see clearly in my debug log i STILL have..
while people kept mining away.. eventually after he had his majority position under control more info leaked out on how it all worked
but by that point he did what he set out to do and already made a LOT of coins !
It was and still is an ingenious system he devised that pulled the wool of the eyes of the ENTIRE altcoin scene and you all ate it up fast and hard.
even after he said he is discontinuing the coin because he lost majority vote control (coin revenue)
virtually nobody at all anywhere said anything bad.. they kept kissing ass (bag holder aids disease syndrome)
So he started the coin and harvested a revenue stream from it then when it was not as profitable he shut it down.. simple as that !
His claimed it was for charity
And the guy soon after went on to make (post here)
PTS / Protoshares and when i brought up what i said (
which is publicly posted common knowledge) he demanded
it had nothing to do with his new coin and he said i was trolling and went on to delete all my comments and try and discredit me and anything i said.
and yeah..... what a dev does on one coin DOES matter on his
NEXT coin !
I had said don't you think PTS / Protoshares guys should be aware of your past history of deliberately
killing your own coins ?
And he responded by promptly changing the PTS ANN topic title and replying back to me he didn't even make the coin LOL
He said.. after sooooo many pages of pretending to be the dev, that..
Invictus Innovations made the coin and he was just posting it
and he then added "Invictus Innovations" to the topic title and why did he not do that on the coins launch and only when i cornered him ? hmmmm LOL
Is that not obvious guys ?
Search the forum here for
Invictus and see what turns up people
So You want
those guys and their swirling vortex of nameless accounts running things ?
or who else ?Using scam coin code ? made by a scammer who just keeps dropping some scheme for a new one ?
each one better than the last *supposedly..
like WTF is a clone then guys ?
If you make ONE turn on a Rubiks Cube and set it down on the table is that a
brand new item ?
The
innovation illusion is a big problem and so is defining some coins such as
IPO coins as Fresh new ideas etc
There is enough coins already.. we have a 1,000 of them there shouldn't be any more coins made, so we don't need a system to "vet" them.
Unless we have a real contender to take down Bitcoin and so far i have seen nothing that even comes close in any way shape or form.
We simply need guys to stop cooking up excuses to fabricate a new gimmick and illusion of innovation for the sake of making a new coin to get in on early.
And when i see the top 5 coins at coinmarketcap.. i see scam coins except for BTC and LTC so are we going to agree on what is good or bad ?
nope.but we'll vote you guys say right ?
well the results will be challenged and refuted hard i have no doubt.
i appreciate the sentiment if your sincere OP and i like the idea of making a positive step forward but i don't think this will work too well to be honest.
and what do i suggest then ? sadly i wish i had a good idea but i just don't.. i don't know what the hell to do about it all
I hate to complain with out offering a constructive suggestion etc.