jagemo
Member
 Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 18, 2015, 02:31:57 PM |
|
What's up with the Hashlink pool? No more coins coming since 13/09 ...  Websites say: We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP.
Findblocks disabled, new blocks will currently not show up in the frontend
Blockupdate disabled, blocks and transactions confirmations are delayed
Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being Any news? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2015, 03:41:02 PM |
|
What's up with the Hashlink pool? No more coins coming since 13/09 ... Websites say: We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP.
Findblocks disabled, new blocks will currently not show up in the frontend
Blockupdate disabled, blocks and transactions confirmations are delayed
Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being Any news? I still have not heard back from Hashlink. We have other great pools to use in the mean time. MPOS\P2PAdvanced MPOS https://www.suchpool.pw/bstyP2P http://bsty.coinminers.net:7225/static/P2P http://p2pool.e-pool.net:8961/static/MultiPoolhttp://infernopool.com/getting_started |
|
|
|
|
Erkallys
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 19, 2015, 06:15:54 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
|
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2015, 06:49:07 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
The GPU miner has not been optimized. I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti. We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners. Below is what we have so far. Update CPU miners for old CPU's Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great) |
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 20, 2015, 09:52:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
September 21, 2015, 12:53:17 PM |
|
Hello WigitGetIt and BSTY fans! I was looking at the performance spreadsheet expecting to find something interesting at this point but I see very little data. There's no trace even of the numbers I provided some months ago! How are the things going? It seems to me the quotations are decent, have you all moved to multipooling this? |
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 21, 2015, 04:00:45 PM |
|
Hello WigitGetIt and BSTY fans! I was looking at the performance spreadsheet expecting to find something interesting at this point but I see very little data. There's no trace even of the numbers I provided some months ago! How are the things going? It seems to me the quotations are decent, have you all moved to multipooling this? Hello. I had a hard time interpreting the data you left. Maybe you can help me get the data in when you have a moment. You can mine at Infernopool http://infernopool.com/getting_started with a sha256 or scyrpt miner and get paid in BSTY. Had this up for about two months now.  |
|
|
|
|
Erkallys
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 21, 2015, 06:20:15 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
The GPU miner has not been optimized. I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti. We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners. Below is what we have so far. Update CPU miners for old CPU's Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great) I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it. |
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 21, 2015, 06:40:10 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
The GPU miner has not been optimized. I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti. We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners. Below is what we have so far. Update CPU miners for old CPU's Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great) I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it. Ok. Cool. Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates. Pretty sweet. I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
September 22, 2015, 02:05:37 PM
Last edit: September 22, 2015, 02:28:58 PM by MaxDZ8 |
|
Hello. I had a hard time interpreting the data you left. Maybe you can help me get the data in when you have a moment. Odd, I was pretty sure I sent you a message. Maybe I clicked on the wrong button and sent it to the trashcan instead! The original message was here. What it means: first of all, I use rawIntensity instead of normal intensity or the widespread xintensity. Reason: it's just easier to understand what's going on. In theory, 2intensity == rawIntensity. Back when that message was written there was an old kernel (v1). You can ignore it now, it was just for reference. The (v2) column is what you care. I don't know if this is the current AMD kernel. I could retry everything if you want. Let's see if I can make something clearer (without using btctalk broken table features)
┌-------------------------------------------------------┐
| --rawIntensity | Equivalent | h/s | Watts | Temp |
| | --intensity | | | Celsius |
├----------------+-------------+-----+--------+---------┤
| 16 | 4 | 30 | 58-106 | 44 |
| 32 | 5 | 56 | 56-105 | 48 |
| 64 | 6 | 91 | 60-105 | 50 |
| 128 | 7 | 152 | 62-109 | 50 |
| 144 | n/a | 105 | 61-107 | 49 |
└-------------------------------------------------------┘So, my card mines at best at rawIntensity 128 (should be equivalent to intensity 7), it produces 152 hashes per second burning between 62 and 109 watts (full system load) and topping at 53C. I reported various settings so you can see it in perspective somehow. I honestly expected some more scaling as computing 128 hashes "only" takes 256MiB of VRAM. |
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
September 22, 2015, 02:11:55 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
The GPU miner has not been optimized. I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti. We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners. Below is what we have so far. Update CPU miners for old CPU's Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great) I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it. Ok. Cool. Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates. Pretty sweet. I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now. I would suggest to check those values. Suchpool currently reports network hashrate at 367 kH/s, which would imply it's one third of a single 750 ti? Not realistic at all. P2pool nodes report estimated network hashrate ~185khs, which would imply it's one fifth of a single midrange card. Hard to believe no 750s are on p2pool. In may 2015, crypto-mining blog reports – Intel Core i7 5820K CPU: 5.22 KHS – AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU: 0.793 KHS – Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 GPU: 1.124 KHS Hard to believe a 750ti can produce 973khs, being equivalent to 186 i7-5820k processors which are... twice as expensive? |
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 22, 2015, 11:31:15 PM |
|
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.
The GPU miner has not been optimized. I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti. We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners. Below is what we have so far. Update CPU miners for old CPU's Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great) I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it. Ok. Cool. Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates. Pretty sweet. I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now. I would suggest to check those values. Suchpool currently reports network hashrate at 367 kH/s, which would imply it's one third of a single 750 ti? Not realistic at all. P2pool nodes report estimated network hashrate ~185khs, which would imply it's one fifth of a single midrange card. Hard to believe no 750s are on p2pool. In may 2015, crypto-mining blog reports – Intel Core i7 5820K CPU: 5.22 KHS – AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU: 0.793 KHS – Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 GPU: 1.124 KHS Hard to believe a 750ti can produce 973khs, being equivalent to 186 i7-5820k processors which are... twice as expensive? Yeah I completely typed that wrong. It should read 973 h/s.  |
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
September 23, 2015, 08:35:22 AM |
|
Habit, I guess!
|
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2015, 11:11:44 AM |
|
Habit, I guess!
What do you mean?  |
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
September 24, 2015, 05:53:17 AM |
|
With most hashes producing at least kilos per second I understand you hit an extra button out of habit.
I read a message some time ago from an user considering GPUs "immensely" more efficient... I was very surprised!
Good to see it has been fixed. Too bad nobody seemed to make this question.
Anyway, a couple of days ago I managed to reproduce yescrypt on GPU myself starting from the original code from Password Hashing Competition... so far it's very painful at roughly 1/3 of the hashrate. OUCH!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
October 04, 2015, 01:06:18 PM |
|
I tried to download the SSE2 miner from OP. It seems MEGA removed it. Please update link!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
