Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 06:01:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What will be considered Bitcoin 1.0?  (Read 2907 times)
Ragnarly (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 04:39:06 PM
Last edit: September 12, 2014, 07:07:39 PM by Ragnarly
 #1

We're currently at Bitcoin Core 0.9 What will it take to get to 1.0?

Edit: Not the wallet, the protocol.
1715104876
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715104876

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715104876
Reply with quote  #2

1715104876
Report to moderator
1715104876
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715104876

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715104876
Reply with quote  #2

1715104876
Report to moderator
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715104876
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715104876

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715104876
Reply with quote  #2

1715104876
Report to moderator
Madness
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


My goal is becaming a billionaire.


View Profile WWW
September 12, 2014, 05:06:25 PM
 #2

Bitcoin core is just a wallet :p

but I'am curious , who made the first bitcoin wallet ?  Satoshi nakamoto too ? Shocked

gadman2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 977
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 12, 2014, 05:09:29 PM
 #3

I was actually asking myself this question a few days ago. "When will bitcoin exit beta?"

Seems it sure has had a lot of media and world wide involvement to still be in beta.

Ragnarly (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 05:10:25 PM
 #4

Bitcoin core is just a wallet :p

but I'am curious , who made the first bitcoin wallet ?  Satoshi nakamoto too ? Shocked

Oh yeah, I meant the protocol, not the wallet.
oceans
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 12, 2014, 05:48:12 PM
 #5

Would be nice to see it exit beta to be honest because I feel it has enough exposure now to come out of beta and may be move to 1.0 so I am unsure as to why they have not considered moving up to 1.0 yet.
Gnarrrly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 05:57:18 PM
 #6

I hope it isnt as cpu consuming as it is now (and ram)
kokojie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003



View Profile
September 12, 2014, 06:13:41 PM
 #7

The protocol is pretty solid, (other than the PoW mining non-sense, but mining is another topic). It's probably already mass adoption ready, other than some minor tweaks and bugfix.

The QT wallet on the other hand, is actually becoming worse and worse, it had better performance probably 3 years ago than now, and performance is deteriorating rapidly. Soon it will require 40GB of free space, a top of the line CPU, and a good amount of RAM, just to run the QT wallet for the first time, and then expect to wait days until it could start working. But then again, no new user is really using QT wallet nowadays I guess.

btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
September 12, 2014, 07:50:03 PM
 #8

 Roll Eyes decrease CACHE to 5Mb and connexion to 12.
problem solved.
teukon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1004



View Profile
September 12, 2014, 11:52:50 PM
 #9

We're currently at Bitcoin Core 0.9 What will it take to get to 1.0?

Edit: Not the wallet, the protocol.

I don't really distinguish between the wallet (Bitcoin Core) and the protocol regarding the status "beta" simply because Bitcoin Core is currently viewed as the reference implementation of the protocol.

I'm sure we'll see Bitcoin Core 0.10, 0.11, and 0.12 first if this remark by Gavin from 2012 is anything to go by:

The things on my "good enough to be called 1.0" list are:

+ easy enough for my grandma to use
+ secure enough that it'd be hard for my grandma to lose her bitcoins, even if her computer is infected by 11 bitcoin-stealing trojans and then catches fire and explodes.
+ past the December block-reward-drops-to-25
teukon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1004



View Profile
September 13, 2014, 12:06:53 AM
 #10

Bitcoin core is just a wallet :p

but I'am curious , who made the first bitcoin wallet ?  Satoshi nakamoto too ? Shocked

He sure did.  You can still see his Bitcoin v0.1 Alpha release notes on Sourceforge.
p2pbucks
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642
Merit: 500


Evolution is the only way to survive


View Profile
September 13, 2014, 12:40:07 AM
 #11

1. thoroughly solve 51% problem
2. eliminate the risk of accepting zero confirmation
3. reward mechenisim of  the long term full node owner
4. allow user to run a SPV intellectual node
andytoshi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 151

-


View Profile
September 13, 2014, 01:31:53 AM
 #12

1. thoroughly solve 51% problem
2. eliminate the risk of accepting zero confirmation
3. reward mechenisim of  the long term full node owner

Can you cite a single core developer suggesting that any of these are targeted or even solvable problems?

Quote
4. allow user to run a SPV intellectual node

What does this mean?
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
September 13, 2014, 03:51:02 AM
 #13

I hope it isnt as cpu consuming as it is now (and ram)
It will be a brain chip implant that runs on gray matter.  Grin

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
September 14, 2014, 05:49:25 AM
 #14

1. thoroughly solve 51% problem
This is a social problem, not a technical problem. It cannot be "fixed" by technical means, by definition.

2. eliminate the risk of accepting zero confirmation
Not likely to be possible.

Willisius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

I'm really quite sane!


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:34:50 PM
 #15

Well due to how versions are handled in the code, 0.99 is the last possible subversion. So at least there's an upper bound for you. Tongue
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 10:39:34 PM
 #16

Well due to how versions are handled in the code, 0.99 is the last possible subversion. So at least there's an upper bound for you. Tongue
Nah, we just have to fix how versions are handled in the code before 0.100 Wink

barwizi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 16, 2014, 10:49:58 AM
 #17

Satoshi wanted to move it into 1.3 was it , a while ago.
teukon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1004



View Profile
September 16, 2014, 07:01:05 PM
 #18

Satoshi wanted to move it into 1.3 was it , a while ago.

Yes.  Here.
deepceleron
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1032



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:37:34 AM
 #19

Besides a long buglist, there are still several great ideas worth of consideration, and until they have been vetted and proven or rejected outright, it is hard to say Bitcoin is "done" and now in maintenance mode.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Softfork_wishlist
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hardfork_Wishlist
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
November 14, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
 #20

Hello ,Help me... Sad..When will Bitcoin core 1.0 release out?
There has been no announcement yet. It's purely speculation at this point.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!