FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 02:23:31 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-)
|
|
|
|
funtotry
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
|
|
March 14, 2015, 02:24:32 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 02:28:39 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol I want to try both variants to be able to see which one is more fun, so I won't change it this time. I'm starting to realize that these competitions are just games in and of itself. Damn I love games :-). Thanks for the awesome input funtotry...
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:09:21 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol I want to try both variants to be able to see which one is more fun, so I won't change it this time. I'm starting to realize that these competitions are just games in and of itself. Damn I love games :-). Thanks for the awesome input funtotry... Usually it is the early guy who wins, in almost all similar competitions (unless the prize is shared) I prefer it as it is.
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 08:53:05 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol I want to try both variants to be able to see which one is more fun, so I won't change it this time. I'm starting to realize that these competitions are just games in and of itself. Damn I love games :-). Thanks for the awesome input funtotry... Usually it is the early guy who wins, in almost all similar competitions (unless the prize is shared) I prefer it as it is. Hey ndnhc and funtotry! So given your comments I think there are basically three different models: - The first guy that hits something wins (that's the model we are using here, and the one that ndnhc likes)
- The last guy that hits something wins (that's the model that funtotry likes)
- All players that hit the same thing share the price (mentioned by ndnhc)
In the first model the best strategy is to try to hit early, in the second model it's best to be late, and in the third model the timing does not matter at all. Not sure right now which version is most fun, will be trying different versions in the future. If someone has a preference, just let me know. :-)
|
|
|
|
funtotry
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:06:40 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol I want to try both variants to be able to see which one is more fun, so I won't change it this time. I'm starting to realize that these competitions are just games in and of itself. Damn I love games :-). Thanks for the awesome input funtotry... Usually it is the early guy who wins, in almost all similar competitions (unless the prize is shared) I prefer it as it is. Hey ndnhc and funtotry! So given your comments I think there are basically three different models: - The first guy that hits something wins (that's the model we are using here, and the one that ndnhc likes)
- The last guy that hits something wins (that's the model that funtotry likes)
- All players that hit the same thing share the price (mentioned by ndnhc)
In the first model the best strategy is to try to hit early, in the second model it's best to be late, and in the third model the timing does not matter at all. Not sure right now which version is most fun, will be trying different versions in the future. If someone has a preference, just let me know. :-) Noooo sharing. That one should be ruled out, but try being last next round. Sharing the prize would be boring and not many people would be open to do that.
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:24:17 PM |
|
OHHH I see. So first person to hit the streak of 9 then they get 1st place and second place is the other 9. Ok that makes much more sense. I think though it should be the last person to hit it, so that if someone gets the same one you get then you have to bet again to ensure your winnings.
That's a great idea, darn would have been much better that way around. I do not want to change the rules of a running competition around too much, so I'll leave it as it is for this one. However, we will have many more competitions to come, and I'd like to use your idea for future ones if you don't mind :-) If you get an agreement from the current top 3 I think you can change the rules now. They would be the only ones affected currently and I think they would be fine with it since there aren't any of the same numbers I think. Of course you can use my ideas lol I want to try both variants to be able to see which one is more fun, so I won't change it this time. I'm starting to realize that these competitions are just games in and of itself. Damn I love games :-). Thanks for the awesome input funtotry... Usually it is the early guy who wins, in almost all similar competitions (unless the prize is shared) I prefer it as it is. Hey ndnhc and funtotry! So given your comments I think there are basically three different models: - The first guy that hits something wins (that's the model we are using here, and the one that ndnhc likes)
- The last guy that hits something wins (that's the model that funtotry likes)
- All players that hit the same thing share the price (mentioned by ndnhc)
In the first model the best strategy is to try to hit early, in the second model it's best to be late, and in the third model the timing does not matter at all. Not sure right now which version is most fun, will be trying different versions in the future. If someone has a preference, just let me know. :-) Noooo sharing. That one should be ruled out, but try being last next round. Sharing the prize would be boring and not many people would be open to do that. Ok, note taken :-) I you have any propositions for competitions you'd like to have, just let me know.
|
|
|
|
funtotry
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:47:55 PM |
|
How about this competition. Person who loses the MOST gets refunded completely for however much they lost. Therefore you make lots of money from people losing and only the BIGGEST loser gets paid... What do you think
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:50:28 PM |
|
How about this competition. Person who loses the MOST gets refunded completely for however much they lost. Therefore you make lots of money from people losing and only the BIGGEST loser gets paid... What do you think Great idea! I guess that would have to be opt in though bc people might not be happy to be labelled the biggest loser publicly :-)
|
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 12:24:30 AM |
|
Ok, here is the updated leaderboard
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 12:41:58 AM |
|
I just added a feature to Double or Nothing where you will get an update when you have hit a qualifying winning streak (see below) For everybody just joining us: We are hosting a competition where you can win up to 0.1btc by hitting a winning streak on Double or Nothing. Click here for details.
|
|
|
|
janggernaut
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1130
|
|
March 15, 2015, 12:59:28 AM |
|
I just added a feature to Double or Nothing where you will get an update when you have hit a qualifying winning streak (see below) For everybody just joining us: We are hosting a competition where you can win up to 0.1btc by hitting a winning streak on Double or Nothing. Click here for details. http://prntscr.com/6gwaps, im got 8 winning streak, but i'm use bet 0.0000002,
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 01:03:45 AM |
|
I just added a feature to Double or Nothing where you will get an update when you have hit a qualifying winning streak (see below) For everybody just joining us: We are hosting a competition where you can win up to 0.1btc by hitting a winning streak on Double or Nothing. Click here for details. http://prntscr.com/6gwaps, im got 8 winning streak, but i'm use bet 0.0000002, Sorry mate, the minimum require bet size is 0.00001. Im guessing from your answer that you know that. I will fix that real quick. Sorry to get your hopes up :-( but thanks a lot for reporting the error so quickly :-)
|
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 01:15:02 AM |
|
I just added a feature to Double or Nothing where you will get an update when you have hit a qualifying winning streak (see below) For everybody just joining us: We are hosting a competition where you can win up to 0.1btc by hitting a winning streak on Double or Nothing. Click here for details. http://prntscr.com/6gwaps, im got 8 winning streak, but i'm use bet 0.0000002, Sorry mate, the minimum require bet size is 0.00001. Im guessing from your answer that you know that. I will fix that real quick. Sorry to get your hopes up :-( but thanks a lot for reporting the error so quickly :-) That error should be fixed now. The script checked that the bet size is larger than 0.00001, but I forgot that we use satoshi internally. Basically that notification would show up to users that bet more than 0.00001 satoshi, which is obviously everybody. Thanks a lot to janggernaut for reporting that bug so quickly, please send me your FastSlots username and I'll put a small bonus into your account :-)
|
|
|
|
somuchee
|
|
March 15, 2015, 02:21:14 AM Last edit: March 15, 2015, 04:35:24 AM by somuchee |
|
|
|
|
|
arallmuus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1425
|
|
March 15, 2015, 04:54:41 AM |
|
I just added a feature to Double or Nothing where you will get an update when you have hit a qualifying winning streak (see below) For everybody just joining us: We are hosting a competition where you can win up to 0.1btc by hitting a winning streak on Double or Nothing. Click here for details. http://prntscr.com/6gwaps, im got 8 winning streak, but i'm use bet 0.0000002, too bad, you could be the current #2 if you play the game with the minimum requirement of 0.00001 and have the chance to win 0.04 at the end of this contest
|
| █▄ | R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | ▀█ | THE #1 SOLANA CASINO | ████████████▄ ▀▀██████▀▀███ ██▄▄▀▀▄▄█████ █████████████ █████████████ ███▀█████████ ▀▄▄██████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ ████████████▀ | ████████████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████ █████████████ ▄████████████ ██▄██████████ ████▄████████ █████████████ █░▀▀█████████ ▀▀███████████ █████▄███████ ████▀▄▀██████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████ ████████████▀ | ........5,000+........ GAMES ......INSTANT...... WITHDRAWALS | ..........HUGE.......... REWARDS ............VIP............ PROGRAM | . PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
shanem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 15, 2015, 04:56:35 AM |
|
I have a question about fastslots. Is it possible to type in a specific amount to bet or you can only move the slider for the standard betting amount?
|
|
|
|
arallmuus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1425
|
|
March 15, 2015, 05:14:56 AM |
|
I have a question about fastslots. Is it possible to type in a specific amount to bet or you can only move the slider for the standard betting amount?
you cant, the only thing you can do to adjust your bet amount is to use the slider below which already has the bet amount configuration and also fastslot need to fix that 6-8e thingie, played with the free balance just now and that error still show up here
|
| █▄ | R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | ▀█ | THE #1 SOLANA CASINO | ████████████▄ ▀▀██████▀▀███ ██▄▄▀▀▄▄█████ █████████████ █████████████ ███▀█████████ ▀▄▄██████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ ████████████▀ | ████████████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████ █████████████ ▄████████████ ██▄██████████ ████▄████████ █████████████ █░▀▀█████████ ▀▀███████████ █████▄███████ ████▀▄▀██████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████ ████████████▀ | ........5,000+........ GAMES ......INSTANT...... WITHDRAWALS | ..........HUGE.......... REWARDS ............VIP............ PROGRAM | . PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
FastSlots (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 10:32:47 AM |
|
Hi guys! Let me go through your comments: I have a question about fastslots. Is it possible to type in a specific amount to bet or you can only move the slider for the standard betting amount?
you cant, the only thing you can do to adjust your bet amount is to use the slider below which already has the bet amount configuration and also fastslot need to fix that 6-8e thingie, played with the free balance just now and that error still show up here @shanem, as arallmuus has correctly pointed out you can only use the slider. The slider lets you select an amount between circa 1% and 20% of your deposit. @arallmuus, we will, promised. Trust me I hate that 6-8e thingie just as much as you do. You'd think that there is an easy way to do that but apparently there is not: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1685680/how-to-avoid-scientific-notation-for-large-numbers-in-javascript. Still we'll look into it very soon. too bad, you could be the current #2 if you play the game with the minimum requirement of 0.00001 and have the chance to win 0.04 at the end of this contest @janggernaut, yap, that would have most likely gotten you into the money, but as arallmuus pointed out your bet size is too small. Basically you need to deposit to be eligible for this competition. @arallmuus: 100% correct :-) @somuchee, WOW you hit some long streaks! Let me look at you screenshots in detail and I'll make an announcement...
|
|
|
|
|