noob2001 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 502
|
|
September 22, 2014, 04:46:43 PM Last edit: September 15, 2021, 01:01:02 PM by noob2001 |
|
.
|
|
|
|
kolloh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1023
|
|
September 22, 2014, 07:55:05 PM |
|
100,000,000 births this year and 40,000,000 deaths year Therefore a 60,000,000 increase in global population And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin. http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/A similar issue was being discussed within topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781192.0 . Perhaps this post should have been added to that post rather than be its own?
|
|
|
|
gts476
|
|
September 23, 2014, 05:59:35 AM |
|
Ebola + WW3
Problem solved.
|
|
|
|
Fabrizio89
|
|
September 23, 2014, 07:30:33 AM Last edit: September 23, 2014, 07:41:20 AM by Fabrizio89 |
|
It is possible that third world countries will see a decrease in child mortality rates and so an increase in overall population for a short period of time, then with the increase of culture and human rights women will be less likely to have many children and focus on one or two like more advanced countries that already slowed down. Population growth charts and projections just follow the linear rates we saw in the last decades, but don't take in account many factor which may eventually see world population increase diminish.
|
|
|
|
sandykho47
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
|
|
September 23, 2014, 12:04:22 PM |
|
Every country should use a solution, a family only have 2 son's This will make zero growth population
And problem solved (in good way) Or you can use bad way for faster solution
|
Kemampuanku Tidak semua orang memiliki dan dapat melakukannya . Tidak memakan kaum sendiri . dan mempunyai kode etik yang tidak masuk akal.
|
|
|
Timetwister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:27:27 PM |
|
Therefore a 60,000,000 increase in global population
And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin.
What's wrong with that? It's also impossible for them to have, say, a ton of gold.
|
|
|
|
Scott J
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:30:11 PM |
|
Therefore a 60,000,000 increase in global population
And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin.
What's wrong with that? It's also impossible for them to have, say, a ton of gold. It's quite possible OP was suggesting this was a good thing... ... for the price of BTC at least!
|
|
|
|
Erdogan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:40:19 PM |
|
Every country should use a solution, a family only have 2 son's This will make zero growth population
And problem solved (in good way) Or you can use bad way for faster solution
What's so good about it? It will drive the population to zero.
|
|
|
|
Timetwister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 23, 2014, 02:27:48 PM |
|
Therefore a 60,000,000 increase in global population
And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin.
What's wrong with that? It's also impossible for them to have, say, a ton of gold. It's quite possible OP was suggesting this was a good thing... ... for the price of BTC at least! Thats what I was implying. Bitcoin becomes more scarce everyday. Then you are right, but there are many things more relevant to its demand than the population growth. Increasing the world population for 1% or 1.5% doesn't make a big difference.
|
|
|
|
countryfree
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1047
Your country may be your worst enemy
|
|
September 23, 2014, 11:20:53 PM |
|
No big news here. In 20 years time, few people will be able to afford a tank of gas. Real estate too is getting more and more expensive everywhere. If the population increases, the share one can expect to get from any finite resource will decrease. BTC like oil or land. There's nothing strange about that.
|
I used to be a citizen and a taxpayer. Those days are long gone.
|
|
|
zorke
|
|
September 24, 2014, 04:37:01 AM |
|
Therefore a 60,000,000 increase in global population
And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin.
What's wrong with that? It's also impossible for them to have, say, a ton of gold. In theory it is possible if enough gold can be mined (it is not known 100% where all the gold deposits are). There is however a hard limit as to how much bitcoin can be mined. I don't think the world population will reach this level as overcrowding and overuse of world resources will prevent the population from getting this large
|
|
|
|
Timetwister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 24, 2014, 10:02:45 AM |
|
I don't think the world population will reach this level as overcrowding and overuse of world resources will prevent the population from getting this large
That depends on productivity and the standard of living people is willing to have for them and their children.
|
|
|
|
CryptoCarmen
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
|
|
September 24, 2014, 10:29:37 AM |
|
100,000,000 births this year and 40,000,000 deaths year
With Ebola those 40m deaths will escalate fast. Just wait a year or two.
|
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 24, 2014, 01:58:13 PM |
|
they should just put everyone who has ebola in quarantine, it's not that hard.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 24, 2014, 02:04:08 PM |
|
And its mathematically impossible for each of those individuals to ever own a full bitcoin.
if 1BTC is 1Million in FIAT ... not a problem : 0,000001 BTC = 1µBTC = 1 unit of FIAT (1USD, 1Euro, 1Yen, 1Yuan).
|
|
|
|
rivoke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1006
|
|
September 24, 2014, 02:47:18 PM |
|
they should just put everyone who has ebola in quarantine, it's not that hard. It is quite hard since its somewhat difficult to detect who has ebola so it takes time and meanwhile they verify if its ebola or not it already spread.
|
|
|
|
CryptoCarmen
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
|
|
September 25, 2014, 12:45:21 PM |
|
they should just put everyone who has ebola in quarantine, it's not that hard. It is quite hard since its somewhat difficult to detect who has ebola so it takes time and meanwhile they verify if its ebola or not it already spread. of course is hard. unless you want to put healthy people together with sick ones, and just close one area and let all die there.
|
|
|
|
chennan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 25, 2014, 02:50:12 PM |
|
No matter how the population grows, large amount of bitcoin will still be kept by a few people. The people who keeps 1 BTC is rare. We should try to be one of the rare people group.
|
|
|
|
redHeadBlunder
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
September 26, 2014, 03:47:17 AM |
|
100,000,000 births this year and 40,000,000 deaths year
With Ebola those 40m deaths will escalate fast. Just wait a year or two. Ebola has actually killed very few people. It is that it kills ~50% of the people who are affected is what is scaring the world. I don't think ebola will cause death rates to increase very much. It has been centuries since disease has caused the death rate to significantly increase (the black plague I believe) but medical technology has increased greatly since then
|
|
|
|
|