Black holes do NOT exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong ...

[catch.me.if.you.can]

"...Albert Einstein: Plagiarist and Fraud

Albert Einstein is today revered as “the Father of Modern Science”. His wrinkled face and wild hair has become a symbol for scientific genius and “his” famous E = mc^2 equation is repeatedly used as the symbol for something scientific and intellectual. And yet there has for years been mounting evidence that this “Father of Modern Science” was nothing but a con man, lying about his ideas and achievements, and stealing the work and the research of others.

The most glaring evidence against Einstein concerns “his” most famous equation. One website notes “The equation E=mc^2, which has been forever linked to Einstein & his Theory of Relativity was not originally published by Einstein. According to Umberto Bartocci, a professor at the University of Perugia and a historian of mathematics, this famous equation was first published by Olinto De Pretto …two years prior to Einstein’s publishing of the equation. In 1903 De Pretto published his equation in the scientific magazine Atte and in 1904 it was republished by the Royal Science Institute of Veneto. Einstein’s research was not published until 1905… Einstein was well versed in Italian and even lived in Northern Italy for a brief time.”

It is unheard of to pass over the original inventor of an equation and to give credit to someone, who claims to have derived it AFTER the equation and its derivation have been published. The equation “E=mc^2″ should be called the “De Pretto Equation” not the “Einstein Equation.”...."

"...The truth eventually wins out and Einstein will someday be best known as a great fraud instead of a great physicist..."

Source: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=13400

[catch.me.if.you.can]

RELATIVITY ASYLUM    http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/sitebuilder/images/Asylum6-578x467.jpg

"...I have no idea how this guy got here!
He mumbled something about trying to
escape into another universe through a
wormhole. Apparently, he got sucked
through our Holy Sewer and ended up
circling with the shit in Zeus's's toilet...."

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/03GR/03BlackHole/02HoleInto.html

[spazzdla]

claims,claims,claims

when she proves it, I'll believe it

No one can really black holes exist.................

[spazzdla]

Some very interesting ideas here about Einstein.. very interesting.

[BADecker]

i would suggest you not to believe on false claims unless it is published from authentic source 

Me too. That's why I believe the Bible.

[BADecker]

Sorry to prove you wrong but...

... my local government is the final and definitive proof that black holes does exist. If you try to contact them, you're immediately redirected into a black hole, and you could yell, scream, pinch, punch, get wasted, run around naked and screaming, claim you're suicidal, bang your head in a brick wall, beg like a dying man, roar like a lion, adress them politely like a diplomat, or cry like a heroinist trying to get off drugs, all to no avail. You're met with darkness, black matter, nothing, zilch, zero, emptiness, spacelessness, it's the void aka the black hole.

You're welcome.

LOL !

See? It's what I've been saying all along. Black holes are a political idea rather than a scientific one.

[BADecker]

u call 9-11 and say your guilty of a crime.  what's the worst that could happen

Your "Towers" could come down in a volley of bullets once they get there.

[BADecker]

Sorry to burst your bubble, but chances are she doesn't know what she is talking about.

http://www.iflscience.com/physics/physicist-claims-have-proven-mathematically-black-holes-do-not-exist

However, not everyone is on board with Mersini-Houghton’s conclusions. William Unruh, a theoretical physicist from the University of British Columbia, pointed out some fatal flaws in the paper's argument.

“The [paper] is nonsense,” Unruh said in an email to IFLS. “Attempts like this to show that black holes never form have a very long history, and this is only the latest. They all misunderstand Hawking radiation, and assume that matter behaves in ways that are completely implausible.”

Then, again, that's political rhetoric. 

[BADecker]

I love that, even the Daily Mail commenters think this is a load of bullshit LOL You do realise that they spotted black holes with fucking telescopes and probes right? They didn't even need to do mathematics to prove they exist, I love religious people like BaDecker, the more science proves them wrong the more desperate they get.

You realize, don't you, that what they spotted with telescopes could be named anything that they wanted to name them? It's the math that backs up what they are, provided there isn't some other math that contradicts the BH math. Now, where might that other math be? Let me see...

[BADecker]

... claims scientist - and she has the maths to prove it.

From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.html#ixzz3ELy9C2DR

• Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist
• She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity
• Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in 'shock' from the find
• Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died
• During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation
• But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn't be able to form a black hole
• If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrong

Read more at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.html#ixzz3ELy9C2DR.

What do you think?

That serious scientists don't publish their research in the Daily Mail.

Except that, with the politics of the universities what it is, they often have to publish in the Daily Mail just to get published.

[BADecker]

Well, let's wait the review from her peers.

Aww, you science types are such a buzz-kill. With you logic and double blind studies. Your ruining the magic. 

Actually, it is magic of the strongest kind they are using. It is called the occult - secret. Nobody else can figure it out without going into strict training in their magic arts. And it wouldn't be so bad if their arts were only math, but when they involve finance and politics at the same time, they really get some secret magic going.

[BADecker]

i think i should improve my math

so one day i can prove Sun is not hot  

We're waiting for an actual first-hand check-out. How long will it be before you get back?   

[BADecker]

So when a star dies, it doesnt end up being a black hole?

Oh look! Here's somebody else that believes stars are alive.   

[sevenz]

she has the "maths" to prove it?
LOL


Black holes indeed exist. We might not fully understand them, or even misunderstand them, but they are there.

And the science in this thread is hilarious!

[BADecker]

whatever.


What will it changes my everyday life?

Or my life in any sense?

Stupid science and fundamental research. "What good is quantum mechanics?" said idiot to Schroedinger.

Enjoying your transistors?

As people look to science, and as they deny God and His Word more and more, there will come a time when God won't stand for it anymore. Just like He has done in the past, He will destroy the unbelievers and their culture. So, it just might affect you.

[BADecker]

she has the "maths" to prove it?
LOL


Black holes indeed exist. We might not fully understand them, or even misunderstand them, but they are there.

And the science in this thread is hilarious!

As I said, you can call anything what you want, even start a bunch of new languages, like modern science is doing.

I love that, even the Daily Mail commenters think this is a load of bullshit LOL You do realise that they spotted black holes with fucking telescopes and probes right? They didn't even need to do mathematics to prove they exist, I love religious people like BaDecker, the more science proves them wrong the more desperate they get.

You realize, don't you, that what they spotted with telescopes could be named anything that they wanted to name them? It's the math that backs up what they are, provided there isn't some other math that contradicts the BH math. Now, where might that other math be? Let me see...

[foggyb]

As I said, you can call anything what you want, even start a bunch of new languages, like modern science is doing.

Mainstream science started to redefine truth a long time ago:

“The charge of circular reasoning in stratigraphy [the study of layers in the ground] can be handled in several ways. [1] It can be ignored, as not the proper concern of the public. [2] It can be denied, by calling down the Law of Evolution. [3] It can be admitted, as a common practice … [4] or it can be avoided, by pragmatic reasoning.”                                           

O’Rourke, J. E., “Pragmatism versus Materialism in Stratigraphy,” American Journal of Science, vol. 276 (January 1976)

[L3G1T]

Let me guess she's athiest lol