monsterer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 02:44:41 PM |
|
I am still waiting for the inevitable environmental backlash from the 390 million tonnes of CO2 produced by the banking system.
I take it, then, that you don't expect any news coverage or negative exposure due to the energy cost of POW?
|
|
|
|
monsterer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 02:54:11 PM |
|
Proof of Work uses as much electricity to mine 1 bitcoin as it does 1,000,000 bitcoins. It has nothing to do with per user.
The article where these tables have been linked from suggests that at the time of writing, it costs $597 per bitcoin mined. So mining one bitcoin is vastly cheaper than mining 1M bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 05:13:49 PM |
|
armchair academics take note – in the event that bitcoin scales to a million times its current size and market cap over the next 30 years, it’s environmental impact will still be insignificant compared to existing systems."
When considering Moore’s Law, we can expect $/GH to continue to half every 18 months until at least 2020.
Dollars per hash is not any kind of a limit. If you can create more efficient hardware in the Watt per hash sense, it does not mean there will be less electricity used. It means that there will be more hashes calculated. Electricity will always be the limiting factor. Simple economics dictate that almost always, most of the block rewards will be spent on electricity. How can we be sure of this? Armchair academics, take another note: Bitcoin mining market is one of the most perfect free markets ever created. Anybody can mine in their bedroom. If there are profits to be made, there will be miners. Rarely, if ever do you find a market more efficient than this. Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
|
|
|
|
monsterer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 05:58:58 PM |
|
Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
If bitcoin always uses proof of work, then you are correct because proof of work will always use a lot of electricity.
|
|
|
|
cdog
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 06:03:46 PM |
|
In short, ASIC's are 99.9% efficient at converting electricity to heat.
Heat is the least useful form of energy, though. The best solution is to produce less by consuming less electricity in the first place. Every new generation of ASIC is vastly more power efficient. Can the same be said for every bank branch or finance employee? Bitcoin enables efficiency gains orders of magnitude above printing, distributing, and then finally destroying billions of notes of paper currency. This is just STEP 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaBapDvfwFwDuring Fiscal Year (FY) 2013, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing delivered approximately 26 million notes a day with a face value of approximately $1.3 billion. During Fiscal Year (FY) 2013, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing delivered approximately 6.6 billion notes at an average cost of 10 cents per note. Over 90 percent of the notes that the BEP delivers each year are used to replace notes already in, or taken out of circulation. Between the Fort Worth, Texas and the Washington, DC facilities, approximately 9.6 tons of ink per day were used during FY 2013. http://www.moneyfactory.gov/uscurrency/annualproductionfigures.html
|
|
|
|
monsterer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 06:29:57 PM |
|
Printed paper money is legacy technology - when comparing electricity usage we really should be talking about digital fiat transfers. After all, if you were to invent some new form of currency now, that wasn't a crypto, it sure as hell would be digital.
|
|
|
|
Eotnak
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 07:40:09 PM |
|
Fiat uses millions of times more energy than Bitcoin. Bitcoin will save the babies, puppies and rainbows.
Evidence? Just to continue the discussion, assuming you are correct for a second this figure isn't per person using the currency is it? World population: 7 billion (ref http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/). Lets assume that half of them use fiat currency, so 3.5 billion Estimated bitcoin population: 500k (ref http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/197tqx/estimating_the_amount_of_bitcoin_users/) Ratio: 7000 fiat users to each bitcoin user. So current bitcoin electricity consumption has to be 7000 times less than current fiat electricity consumption in order to be on par. So, at a million times less energy consumption bitcoin would indeed consume less. So lets see this evidence? Cheers, Paul. Please note bold text. I hadn't. That's actually very useful - this says that current bitcoin mining electricity usage is roughly 600 times less than the fiat banking system. Taking into account my previous point assumption about the cost per user, that means that, per user bitcoin mining uses 11 times more than the fiat banking system.
Talking about cost per user is important because currently bitcoin is far from at mass adoption levels, whereas fiat certainly is.
FTFY Printed paper money is legacy technology - when comparing electricity usage we really should be talking about digital fiat transfers. After all, if you were to invent some new form of currency now, that wasn't a crypto, it sure as hell would be digital.
Just some more numbers that we can estimate and assume. Also, printed paper money is current technology and very much relevant to this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 10:27:02 PM |
|
Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
If bitcoin always uses proof of work, then you are correct because proof of work will always use a lot of electricity. Of course. But, my estimate of probability that it will ever be changed away from POW is zero.
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 10:29:46 PM |
|
Every new generation of ASIC is vastly more power efficient.
So we only stop adding them when there are more of them. Again, running costs become the ultimate limit. Thank you for, again, repeating that "more efficient mining hardware" fallacy.
|
|
|
|
torry28
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 10:59:26 PM |
|
Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
If bitcoin always uses proof of work, then you are correct because proof of work will always use a lot of electricity. But generating heat with electricity does not necessary means waste. The heat could be well used in future when the competetion will go to the point only the miners who sells/monetarize the heat can still turn profit in Bitcoin mining
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4410
Merit: 3305
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2014, 11:44:13 PM |
|
Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
If bitcoin always uses proof of work, then you are correct because proof of work will always use a lot of electricity. But generating heat with electricity does not necessary means waste. The heat could be well used in future when the competetion will go to the point only the miners who sells/monetarize the heat can still turn profit in Bitcoin mining That doesn't matter. Money from generating non-waste heat just means more money to buy more power.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
Soros Shorts
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1617
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 12:07:15 AM |
|
In the long run Bitcoin mining always moves toward zero profitability. In the state of dynamic equilibrium, the cost of mining would be more or less equal to the value of the mined coins (block reward and fees). Hence there is an upper limit to how much electricity mining will consume. As the block reward halves, the power usage also halves over the long term (assuming a steady price). As the value of BTC increases, the power usage will also increase. This upper limit is independent of the number of users or the number of transactions per second, at least while fees are a small fraction of the block reward.
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 12:25:14 AM |
|
Bitcoin mining uses an insane amount of electricity. If bitcoin gains mass adoption, it will swiftly be followed by a fully justified environmentalist backlash as the facts regarding the vast electricity use in bitcoin mining operations become fully disseminated. When one mining farm alone consumes $70,000 USD / month ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/12/chinese_bitcoin_farms_from_scifi_to_scuzzy/) in electricity alone, it has got be time to ask why bitcoin is still using the costly proof of work algorithm ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_work), which is the primary reason for the vast costs involved. If bitcoin is to be a true replacement for visa or paypal, it must be an environmentally sound choice. Cheers, Paul. How much diesel fuel does a copper/gold/silver mine use on a daily basis? What amount per month? It is several orders of magnitude larger than bitcoin is and that is just 1 mine.
|
|
|
|
toleng
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 01:42:49 AM |
|
Bitcoin miner is a perfect money printing machine. Electricity goes in, money goes out. This simple fact overwhelms everything else, and ensures that Bitcoin will always use a lot of electricity.
If bitcoin always uses proof of work, then you are correct because proof of work will always use a lot of electricity. But generating heat with electricity does not necessary means waste. The heat could be well used in future when the competetion will go to the point only the miners who sells/monetarize the heat can still turn profit in Bitcoin mining No, it is not possible to transform heat into other forms of energy. Unless you need heat right away (to stay warm) any heat energy is essentially wasted
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4410
Merit: 3305
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 05:45:49 AM |
|
No, it is not possible to transform heat into other forms of energy. Unless you need heat right away (to stay warm) any heat energy is essentially wasted
Tell me, if not by transforming heat, then how is electricity generated? You obviously don't live in Iceland, where 25% of the power is geothermal. Try this for starters: Geothermal electricity
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 06:13:04 AM |
|
To force people to use some money without production cost (like fiat money), you need to make it a legal tender, that requires a war, which cost many many times more than bitcoin mining, it actually cost everything in a country
If people are voluntarily using one type of money like gold or bitcoin, this money must have production cost to worth something. If it can be duplicated endlessly without any significant cost, it will worth nothing, just look at those PoS alt-coins
|
|
|
|
repairguy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 07:14:47 AM |
|
Perhaps you missed it: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.coindesk.com%2F2014%2F07%2FPicture-23-630x227.png&t=665&c=11G26Xny4clyew) I hadn't. That's actually very useful - this says that current bitcoin mining electricity usage is roughly 600 times less than the fiat banking system. Taking into account my previous point about the cost per user, that means that, per user bitcoin mining uses 11 times more than the fiat banking system. Talking about cost per user is important because currently bitcoin is far from at mass adoption levels, whereas fiat certainly is. However, if the bitcoin network acquired 100x more users, the consumption of electricity would not need to increase to sustain the other users, bringing the ratio per person to a more respectable level. Also, as the profit ratio of mining decreases, I think that the overall hash rate will decrease. Many of the units that will be shut down will be older and less efficient, because they have completely lost profitability.
|
|
|
|
Grand_Voyageur
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 07:21:10 AM |
|
Fiat uses millions of times more energy than Bitcoin. Bitcoin will save the babies, puppies and rainbows.
And bring back unicorns. +1. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) No, it is not possible to transform heat into other forms of energy. Unless you need heat right away (to stay warm) any heat energy is essentially wasted
Tell me, if not by transforming heat, then how is electricity generated? You obviously don't live in Iceland, where 25% of the power is geothermal. Try this for starters: Geothermal electricityIMHO ASIC Farms surely will end up trying to recovery some of their operation cost by using their waste heat for District Heating ops as some Data Centers already did. As any of you surely knows ASIC farms cooling is a issue and they're already engaging in a competition to be more efficient on dissipating excess heat from their equipments. District Heating is done also with the waste hot water from (Thermo)Nuclear Power plants as in Swiss' Kernkraftwerk Beznau.
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
Anarchyman99
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 03, 2014, 07:21:31 AM |
|
Enviromentalists gonna environmentalist, but if bitcoin really goes mainstream, would it even matter? Whenever there's a lot of money involved, things like the environment are usually forgotten. Just look at the rainforests...
|
|
|
|
|