[ANN] LITHIUM (LIT) - NO PREMINE - BLAKE 256 - MERGE MINED -- HOT NEW COIN --

[shimlbit]

he dont know how to use getting started from the pool page

[1713530966]

1713530966

[1713530966]

1713530966

[1713530966]

1713530966

[1713530966]

1713530966

[BlueDragon747]

all pools should now be merge mining BLC+PHO+BBTC+XDQ+ELT+UMO+LIT

http://eu3.blakecoin.com *Located in London
http://ny2.blakecoin.com *Located in New York
http://la1.blakecoin.com *Located in Los Angeles
http://cg1.blakecoin.com *Located in Chicago

please remember to add all your wallet addresses(BLC+PHO+BBTC+XDQ+ELT+UMO+LIT) in the account section or it may throw an error as empty wallet address = duplicate entry  

Also available is NOMP Merged Pool (run by Chiguireitor)
http://nomp.universalmolecule.co.ve *Located in Miami

Note:
I am going back to my other work which is game dev atm

sorry not going to do user support all day but if there is any problems with pools then let me know

will try and check this thread but if not try in the blakecoin tread which I check more often

[nandaltc]

u need to setup a worker on the pools page

ur username.worker and than worker pw

example

u sign up as stupidminer

u make a worker named worker1 set a password like x

than u need to setup ur config wirh

user:stupidminer.worker1
password:x


u need

user:feryjhie.worker 1
password:x

thanks now it working

[shimlbit]

np dude

[teknohog]

I built the Linux daemon, and there's something weird about the port numbers. There's this if I start it with default ports:

Code:

Error: An error occurred while setting up the RPC port 12007 for listening on IPv4: bind: Address already in use

Of course, I checked that no other process is using that port, so it's something about lithiumd.

Setting either port=12005 or rpcport=12005 works. It seems the daemon is trying to use 12007 for both network and RPC by default, rather than 12000 and 12007.

[jelt14]

im new to blake    Im using 280x black  im getting 2.03 g/h average any thing i can do to change for increase hash thanks

[Edacra]

Trying to mine "pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "http://127.0.0.1:12000",
      "user" : "user",
      "pass" : "pw"
   }
],

"intensity" : "11",
"auto-gpu" : true,
"expiry" : "10",
"failover-only" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"log" : "5",
"no-restart" : true,
"queue" : "5",
"scan-time" : "1",
"worksize" : "128",
"temp-hysteresis" : "4",
"blake256" : true,
"vectors" : "1",
"kernel-path" : "/"
}

and I get the message URL or credentials invalid? I use the stuff that i have in my config folder rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pw
rpcport=12000
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
server=1
daemon=1
listen=1
addnode=66.172.12.77
addnode=108.61.242.204

[gymnastico]

my setting for EAH 6950, driver 14.4 win7 64, cgminer 3.7.2 >>> 1.560Gh/s 

{
"pools" : [
   {
           "url" : "127.0.0.1:8984",
      "user" : "xxxxxx",
      "pass" : "xxxxxx"
        }
       
],
"intensity" : "12",
"expiry" : "30",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "5",
"no-restart" : true,
"queue" : "3",
"scan-time" : "30",
"worksize" : "128",
"temp-hysteresis" : "4",
"blake256" : true,
"vectors" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "965",
"gpu-fan" : "60",
"gpu-memclock" : "895",
"temp-cutoff" : "94",
"temp-overheat" : "88",
"temp-target" : "74",
"kernel-path" : "/"
}


Lithium.config

listen=1
gen=0
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=xxxxxx
rpcpassword=xxxxxx
rpcport=8984
server=1
daemon=1

[op.8pool]

hi dev
i have launched now a pool for Lithium ONLY
use nomp&mpos for miners

i have dedicated 2 port stratum (vardiff and fixed)
instructions are in pool.

i set low fee only 0.5% for purpose
i have tested now my pool with ati 7950 is works !
link is my signature

for A&Q i am here
thanks

[smic]

lit.8pool.dtdns.net
Works!

[BlueDragon747]

hi dev
i have launched now a pool for Lithium ONLY
use nomp&mpos for miners

i have dedicated 2 port stratum (vardiff and fixed)
instructions are in pool.

i set low fee only 0.5% for purpose
i have tested now my pool with ati 7950 is works !
link is my signature

for A&Q i am here
thanks

lit.8pool.dtdns.net
Works!

Last Block Found   0

hmm works you both say and single mining a merged coin instead of merge mining 7 coins at same time with same hashrate hmm

Hope you realize the hashing in Blake based coins is slightly diffrent than most other coins e.g single sha256d in work gen, blake-256 for address, PoW/AuXPoW, checksum etc..

[smic]

last block found 0...if not have miners inside...
mining here i am curious

[smic]

lit.8pool.dtdns.net has found your 1st block number 2165
yay!!!!!!!
this pool Works!
 

[xPooky]

lit.8pool.dtdns.net has found your 1st block number 2165
yay!!!!!!!
this pool Works!
 

yes it did

[mogrith]

Was already Mining on LA1. so LIT is already collecting in my account. Just DL'd and started wallet.

Made a new address for the pool and updated my account with wallet address and a autopay level.

If you want to mine it on it's own pool or solo mine you are free to do so. The same hash can be pointed to a merged pool and you can get 7 coins mined at the same time and not 1/7 on each, it's like you have the hash on all of them

I have ~10LIT 3.23 Confirmed 6.75unconfirmed)already without redcuing my mining of BLC and related coins.


Any info on what Lit will be used for? Buy powerpack with Lithium or as a bad pun buy book with you LIT.

[smic]

Was already Mining on LA1. so LIT is already collecting in my account. Just DL'd and started wallet.

Made a new address for the pool and updated my account with wallet address and a autopay level.

If you want to mine it on it's own pool or solo mine you are free to do so. The same hash can be pointed to a merged pool and you can get 7 coins mined at the same time and not 1/7 on each, it's like you have the hash on all of them

I have ~10LIT 3.23 Confirmed 6.75unconfirmed)already without redcuing my mining of BLC and related coins.


Any info on what Lit will be used for? Buy powerpack with Lithium or as a bad pun buy book with you LIT.

I did not understand a lot of what you say. can explain in a more simple way.thx.
I think... Solo mining with this coin is crazy. Diff is more high in few hours... Pool is good and depend the value of coin. Much miners mining fantom or monetaverde or ducknote for ex in cryptonote algo in pool from single coin , but this coins are merged mined with bytecoin or monero....why???...

[lithiumc]

Lithium will be seeking to partner with websites and others who want to be introduced to the benefits of the blake 256 system. Many 1st and 3rd party applications (mostly game related) are on the drawing board for lithium. The lithium developers plan to be open to the community on desired features to add/enhance the project and the whole blake 256 syystem.

[BlueDragon747]

I did not understand a lot of what you say. can explain in a more simple way.thx.
I think... Solo mining with this coin is crazy. Diff is more high in few hours... Pool is good and depend the value of coin. Much miners mining fantom or monetaverde or ducknote for ex in cryptonote algo in pool from single coin , but this coins are merged mined with bytecoin or monero....why???...

true merge mining is simple to understand

your hashrate mines 7* coins at same time no split or anything just luck for block finds like all mining

https://blakecoin.org/merged-mining

merge mine only works for same algo, same shares.

you cannot merge mine Lithium with "fantom or monetaverde or ducknote" or "bytecoin or monero" none of them are Blake-256  

*not limited to 7 just how many are in merge atm

[smic]

thank you for you explain.
I am that I expressed myself badly ... I was just making an example with the coins that use cryptonote algo...

[BlueDragon747]

thank you for you explain.
I am that I expressed myself badly ... I was just making an example with the coins that use cryptonote algo...

more hashrate also = better security (from attack 51% etc), better average block time(for transactions), more developers working on code base helping each other out and finding/fixing bugs etc

Blake-256 is also a lightweight algo good in software/hardware and one of the few algo's used that is faster than SHA-256D(Bitcoin etc)