On many topics, journalists don't research the info on the subject they're writing on. Some do a good jobs and some do a shitty one.
Let just hope that not many people use this article as a reference
Since it has a name pertaining to WallStreet, anyone without five seconds is probably going to believe it. It's like when Yahoo got a team of journalists to do something on RATs, and, they said it was 'new technology' and other bullish.
Sad, it should just redirect them to Dailymail at this quality. That's why I'm a Huffington person.