Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 10:32:12 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Spending and Receiving Stolen Coins.  (Read 7195 times)
LoupGaroux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
May 21, 2012, 08:26:43 PM
 #81

And that, Sir, is not slander, that is healthy skepticism and very public doubt concerning your integrity, and the veracity of this story.
No, everything you accuse me of therein is a lie. This degree of slander should really get you banned, IMO.

If you understood what "slander" is, instead of trying to use big words to express your indignation that somebody might actually question if the emperor is clothed or not, you would know that what I have stated is opinion, and a very public statement of a possible alternate background for what is going on in this circumstance. That is not, and never would be considered, slander. Your histrionics to the contrary, you have established a very significant body of work in this community, much of it laudable and to be commended, but tainted with dramatically poor impulse control. I will not divert this topic with a history of your embarrassing moments, but you are one of the very last people that should be casting any stones, your history is filthy with unethical behavior, diversion of others hashing power to serve your own agenda, and a diametric opposition to the spirit of open source when discussing evolution of the basis of this community.

And, you might want to check the TOS for this message forum before you begin to spout off about banning people who disagree with you, or dare to challenge your delusions of godhood. But then I guess "opinions" are just like assholes, everybody has one, and some are more full of crap than others.

54Gh/s bASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices
Pre-Order Yours Today!     
Only $1069.99 ! @ http://www.BitcoinASIC.com


Look^^ I'm selling my soul too!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481409132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481409132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481409132
Reply with quote  #2

1481409132
Report to moderator
1481409132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481409132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481409132
Reply with quote  #2

1481409132
Report to moderator
1481409132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481409132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481409132
Reply with quote  #2

1481409132
Report to moderator
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
May 24, 2012, 08:00:33 PM
 #82

And that, Sir, is not slander, that is healthy skepticism and very public doubt concerning your integrity, and the veracity of this story.
No, everything you accuse me of therein is a lie. This degree of slander should really get you banned, IMO.

If you understood what "slander" is, instead of trying to use big words to express your indignation that somebody might actually question if the emperor is clothed or not, you would know that what I have stated is opinion, and a very public statement of a possible alternate background for what is going on in this circumstance. That is not, and never would be considered, slander. Your histrionics to the contrary, you have established a very significant body of work in this community, much of it laudable and to be commended, but tainted with dramatically poor impulse control. I will not divert this topic with a history of your embarrassing moments, but you are one of the very last people that should be casting any stones, your history is filthy with unethical behavior, diversion of others hashing power to serve your own agenda, and a diametric opposition to the spirit of open source when discussing evolution of the basis of this community.

And, you might want to check the TOS for this message forum before you begin to spout off about banning people who disagree with you, or dare to challenge your delusions of godhood. But then I guess "opinions" are just like assholes, everybody has one, and some are more full of crap than others.

What do you expect from a religious nutjob Roll Eyes

He once said LTC is a plot to take BTC from the fools. What if BTC is a plot to take USD from the fools  Cheesy

However, him killing CLC was a top job in my book and I respect him for killing that scam and BTC development.
galambo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390



View Profile
May 27, 2012, 03:35:40 PM
 #83

How about a system where each bitcoin is valued based on how much you personally trust each person (wallet) that has ever held it? If everybody did this, that would make us a lot more discerning about who we dealt with, wouldn't it?

I'd like to see a situation where Bernie Bitoff may steal all the bitcoins, but they would not buy even one pair of alpaca socks.

Additionally, just because we have an anonymous service, doesn't mean we should primarily use it anonymously. The best members of this community reveal exactly who they are. The power of an anonymity service is that at any moment you could "go dark." However operating in the dark is a lot like being in an underwater submarine versus one that has been surfaced. Everything you do becomes a little more difficult.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
May 27, 2012, 03:51:58 PM
 #84

How about a system where each bitcoin is valued based on how much you personally trust each person (wallet) that has ever held it? If everybody did this, that would make us a lot more discerning about who we dealt with, wouldn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility

It would be the death of Bitcoin (or any currency).
galambo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390



View Profile
May 27, 2012, 04:10:26 PM
 #85

How about a system where each bitcoin is valued based on how much you personally trust each person (wallet) that has ever held it? If everybody did this, that would make us a lot more discerning about who we dealt with, wouldn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility

It would be the death of Bitcoin (or any currency).

The currency would still be fungible for the set of all honest participants that only dealt with other honest people. Smiley
westkybitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980

Firstbits: Compromised. Thanks, Android!


View Profile
May 27, 2012, 07:06:11 PM
 #86

How about a system where each bitcoin is valued based on how much you personally trust each person (wallet) that has ever held it? If everybody did this, that would make us a lot more discerning about who we dealt with, wouldn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility

It would be the death of Bitcoin (or any currency).

The currency would still be fungible for the set of all honest participants that only dealt with other honest people. Smiley

No, it wouldn't (just think about it for a minute.)

That's the whole problem with these sorts of proposals.

Bitcoin is the ultimate freedom test. It tells you who is giving lip service and who genuinely believes in it.
...
...
In the future, books that summarize the history of money will have a line that says, “and then came bitcoin.” It is the economic singularity. And we are living in it now. - Ryan Dickherber
...
...
ATTENTION BFL MINING NEWBS: Just got your Jalapenos in? Wondering how to get the most value for the least hassle? Give BitMinter a try! It's a smaller pool with a fair & low-fee payment method, lots of statistical feedback, and it's easier than EasyMiner! (Yes, we want your hashing power, but seriously, it IS the easiest pool to use! Sign up in seconds to try it!)
...
...
The idea that deflation causes hoarding (to any problematic degree) is a lie used to justify theft of value from your savings.
payb.tc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812



View Profile
May 27, 2012, 10:46:42 PM
 #87

How about a system where each bitcoin is valued based on how much you personally trust each person (wallet) that has ever held it? If everybody did this, that would make us a lot more discerning about who we dealt with, wouldn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility

It would be the death of Bitcoin (or any currency).

The currency would still be fungible for the set of all honest participants that only dealt with other honest people. Smiley

but there are honest crooks that are totally honest about their crookedness.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!