Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 09:54:08 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 1156 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels.  (Read 1974254 times)
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:04:09 PM
 #21

Tnx.Smiley you are right.
1512986048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512986048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512986048
Reply with quote  #2

1512986048
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1512986048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512986048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512986048
Reply with quote  #2

1512986048
Report to moderator
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:22:39 PM
 #22

I installed Cuda 6.5 and visual expres 2013 and getting this error when launching my bat

http://prntscr.com/4xhhwg

any ideas?
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:24:58 PM
 #23

haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe
Bombadil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:25:07 PM
 #24

Tnx.Smiley you are right.

Sent you some coins Wink Haven't got much to spare, been nicely mining with <= 3 GPUs for a few months now.
Hope you'll like the few beers you can get from that Cheesy

haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe

xD
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2014, 10:41:31 PM
 #25

Is this version just my sources compiled ? https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer

I see you have colors and my status lines too...

Thread Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:43:53 PM
 #26

Unfortunately there is no improvement on my EVGA GTX 970 Sad

Before OC I was getting 5700 KH/S and after OC around 6100 KH/S

with this new ccminer it is the same

Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'

Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2014, 10:47:50 PM
 #27


Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'


Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:
$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree Smiley

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:55:50 PM
 #28

Actually thats the one I've been using for weeks ya Smiley
I thought this might even add more to it

So is 6200 my max or do u see further improvements in yours?

ive rread in other threads that having the miner keep the card in P0 state, and memory up to 3500 helps. I was able to replicate this iwth 'nvidia inspector' and saw some improvement, but it makes my computer hang too much
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 11:02:57 PM
 #29

Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin
great wow  Cheesy but hashatme has my worker difficulty set so high im throwing in 50mh/s and that pool is showing 10mh/s.

It's all a question of balance.
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
October 19, 2014, 01:48:46 AM
 #30

i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version :

Yours :
Code:
==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.95%  14.5236s       296  49.066ms  48.325ms  52.197ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
 19.27%  13.3595s       297  44.982ms  44.554ms  50.817ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
 11.74%  8.13434s       296  27.481ms  26.976ms  30.969ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
 10.63%  7.36593s       296  24.885ms  24.556ms  27.590ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
  6.99%  4.84835s       296  16.380ms  16.199ms  18.494ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  5.29%  3.66619s       297  12.344ms  12.201ms  13.939ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
  5.02%  3.47754s       296  11.748ms  11.322ms  13.248ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  4.24%  2.93967s       296  9.9313ms  9.4073ms  10.335ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
  3.51%  2.43131s       296  8.2139ms  8.0358ms  8.5024ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
  2.87%  1.99201s       297  6.7071ms  6.3100ms  7.6564ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  2.69%  1.86559s       297  6.2814ms  6.1864ms  7.1012ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
  2.66%  1.84484s       297  6.2116ms  6.1330ms  7.0152ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  2.38%  1.65098s       297  5.5589ms  5.4953ms  6.2752ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
  1.47%  1.01983s       296  3.4454ms  3.3832ms  3.6530ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
  0.28%  195.46ms       295  662.57us  652.23us  699.94us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
  0.00%  875.13us       295  2.9660us  2.4000us  12.479us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  627.25us       295  2.1260us  1.3430us  9.0870us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  63.389us        82     773ns     512ns  1.2480us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

and mine :
Code:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.80%  6.36219s       146  43.577ms  42.978ms  44.897ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 18.86%  5.77071s       146  39.525ms  39.119ms  44.727ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
 11.66%  3.56600s       146  24.425ms  24.071ms  27.458ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 10.59%  3.24123s       146  22.200ms  21.875ms  24.802ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
  7.53%  2.30443s       146  15.784ms  15.575ms  17.894ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  5.30%  1.62276s       146  11.115ms  10.976ms  12.522ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.99%  1.52627s       146  10.454ms  10.235ms  11.892ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.21%  1.28899s       146  8.8287ms  8.4681ms  9.1675ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.48%  1.06443s       146  7.2906ms  6.9558ms  7.5275ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.05%  934.36ms       147  6.3562ms  6.2786ms  7.1199ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.68%  820.56ms       146  5.6203ms  5.5330ms  6.3415ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.64%  807.37ms       146  5.5299ms  5.4526ms  6.2354ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.63%  804.03ms       147  5.4696ms  5.4003ms  6.1889ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
  1.46%  446.72ms       146  3.0597ms  3.0059ms  3.1561ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  0.11%  33.535ms       145  231.28us  214.59us  265.21us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
  0.00%  428.88us       145  2.9570us  2.4000us  9.4720us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  320.11us       145  2.2070us  1.3440us  9.4390us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  77.406us       110     703ns

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


View Profile WWW
October 19, 2014, 02:02:44 AM
 #31


Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'


Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:
$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree Smiley
there is no djm34 version of x11  (at least not yet...).
I let you fight over which one is faster, it is funny to watch  Grin

edit: I don't think there is any relationship between your version and the one of _sp who has chosen is own path
... all this for 200kh/s  Roll Eyes

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Dotcommie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 474


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 05:22:31 AM
 #32

Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin

Have you investigated whatever is going on with jackpotcoin?  I emailed you what was going on when I tried mining it.  It seemed like a nice improvement, but the pools only saw about 1/8 of the reported hash in the cmd prompt.

Thanks for your development efforts, I will definitely be messing around with this tomorrow night and Monday and will see how my rigs perform. I am just using old nvminer on jackpot currently since the gf and her family are taking up all my time this weekend :-/

**Sorry, I didn't refresh before posting, I see someone else had the same issue.  I'll get back to you if I find any more out tomorrow.

Sign up at 1Broker and trade BTC/Stocks/Commodities/Forex with leverage!: https://1broker.com/?r=15262
---SPR: SPbXgnz4w3aWfS738wFmr4VGnFem6YEcYN --- BTC: 15z9TMN8cfkZjGH8rX8dF7yjbFAbHGfMpg
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 07:26:00 AM
 #33


Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'


Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:
$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree Smiley

I will publish the sourcecode, but it breaks compabillity with old cards, so I need some more work. I don't take all the credit. Start the miner and you willl see you name:)

Happy hashing
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218



View Profile
October 19, 2014, 11:13:28 AM
 #34

Using CCMINER -djm34-m7v7, average of 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
And ccminer-Maxwell.7z, the same 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
With different pools.
X11 ~2675,~2725  X13 ~2050,~2155  X15 ~1825,~1910 nist5  ~8250,~8360  quark ~4100,~5280

Im going to try over clocking more, i may get more.
   
   
   

It's all a question of balance.
Blasülz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 11:38:52 AM
 #35

after some trouble getting it started i got this:

x11: 2750 - 2850 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2740 - 2780 khash)
x13: 2100 - 2180 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2090 - 2110 khash)
x15: 1880 - 1910 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 1840 - 1860 khash)

750ti, Core: 1332 Mhz, Ram: 3425 Mhz

BTC: 1CaDahPeaeAJdtssnMpRBfkNczi8k7uSjD
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 11:44:40 AM
 #36

i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version :

Yours :
Code:
==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.95%  14.5236s       296  49.066ms  48.325ms  52.197ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
 19.27%  13.3595s       297  44.982ms  44.554ms  50.817ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
 11.74%  8.13434s       296  27.481ms  26.976ms  30.969ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
 10.63%  7.36593s       296  24.885ms  24.556ms  27.590ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
  6.99%  4.84835s       296  16.380ms  16.199ms  18.494ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  5.29%  3.66619s       297  12.344ms  12.201ms  13.939ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
  5.02%  3.47754s       296  11.748ms  11.322ms  13.248ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  4.24%  2.93967s       296  9.9313ms  9.4073ms  10.335ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
  3.51%  2.43131s       296  8.2139ms  8.0358ms  8.5024ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
  2.87%  1.99201s       297  6.7071ms  6.3100ms  7.6564ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  2.69%  1.86559s       297  6.2814ms  6.1864ms  7.1012ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
  2.66%  1.84484s       297  6.2116ms  6.1330ms  7.0152ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  2.38%  1.65098s       297  5.5589ms  5.4953ms  6.2752ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
  1.47%  1.01983s       296  3.4454ms  3.3832ms  3.6530ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
  0.28%  195.46ms       295  662.57us  652.23us  699.94us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
  0.00%  875.13us       295  2.9660us  2.4000us  12.479us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  627.25us       295  2.1260us  1.3430us  9.0870us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  63.389us        82     773ns     512ns  1.2480us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

and mine :
Code:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.80%  6.36219s       146  43.577ms  42.978ms  44.897ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 18.86%  5.77071s       146  39.525ms  39.119ms  44.727ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
 11.66%  3.56600s       146  24.425ms  24.071ms  27.458ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 10.59%  3.24123s       146  22.200ms  21.875ms  24.802ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
  7.53%  2.30443s       146  15.784ms  15.575ms  17.894ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  5.30%  1.62276s       146  11.115ms  10.976ms  12.522ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.99%  1.52627s       146  10.454ms  10.235ms  11.892ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.21%  1.28899s       146  8.8287ms  8.4681ms  9.1675ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.48%  1.06443s       146  7.2906ms  6.9558ms  7.5275ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.05%  934.36ms       147  6.3562ms  6.2786ms  7.1199ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.68%  820.56ms       146  5.6203ms  5.5330ms  6.3415ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.64%  807.37ms       146  5.5299ms  5.4526ms  6.2354ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.63%  804.03ms       147  5.4696ms  5.4003ms  6.1889ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
  1.46%  446.72ms       146  3.0597ms  3.0059ms  3.1561ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  0.11%  33.535ms       145  231.28us  214.59us  265.21us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
  0.00%  428.88us       145  2.9570us  2.4000us  9.4720us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  320.11us       145  2.2070us  1.3440us  9.4390us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  77.406us       110     703ns

My version is compiled with compute 5.0 only. The next version will be compiled with 5.2 as well. Something strange with your numbers though. I didn't modify luffa512, but my version is slower in your test. Perhaps compute 5.2 compilation will help
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232


Get smart !


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:14:41 PM
 #37

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:20:01 PM
 #38

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s

how about consumption?
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232


Get smart !


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:28:33 PM
 #39

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s

how about consumption?
Hmm I dont have any Watmeter , but MSI AB showes power usage between 85-90% on both cards
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:43:38 PM
 #40

Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin.
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 1156 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!