CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Tnx. you are right.

[1715113982]

1715113982

[1715113982]

1715113982

[1715113982]

1715113982

[1715113982]

1715113982

[1715113982]

1715113982

[SS2006]

I installed Cuda 6.5 and visual expres 2013 and getting this error when launching my bat

http://prntscr.com/4xhhwg

any ideas?

[SS2006]

haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe

[Bombadil]

Tnx. you are right.

Sent you some coins Haven't got much to spare, been nicely mining with <= 3 GPUs for a few months now.
Hope you'll like the few beers you can get from that

haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe

xD

[Epsylon3]

Is this version just my sources compiled ? https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer

I see you have colors and my status lines too...

Thread Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064

[SS2006]

Unfortunately there is no improvement on my EVGA GTX 970

Before OC I was getting 5700 KH/S and after OC around 6100 KH/S

with this new ccminer it is the same

Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'

[Epsylon3]

Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'

Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:

$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree

[SS2006]

Actually thats the one I've been using for weeks ya
I thought this might even add more to it

So is 6200 my max or do u see further improvements in yours?

ive rread in other threads that having the miner keep the card in P0 state, and memory up to 3500 helps. I was able to replicate this iwth 'nvidia inspector' and saw some improvement, but it makes my computer hang too much

[tbearhere]

Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin

great wow   but hashatme has my worker difficulty set so high im throwing in 50mh/s and that pool is showing 10mh/s.

[Epsylon3]

i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version :

Yours :

Code:

==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.95%  14.5236s       296  49.066ms  48.325ms  52.197ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
 19.27%  13.3595s       297  44.982ms  44.554ms  50.817ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
 11.74%  8.13434s       296  27.481ms  26.976ms  30.969ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
 10.63%  7.36593s       296  24.885ms  24.556ms  27.590ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
  6.99%  4.84835s       296  16.380ms  16.199ms  18.494ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  5.29%  3.66619s       297  12.344ms  12.201ms  13.939ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
  5.02%  3.47754s       296  11.748ms  11.322ms  13.248ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  4.24%  2.93967s       296  9.9313ms  9.4073ms  10.335ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
  3.51%  2.43131s       296  8.2139ms  8.0358ms  8.5024ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
  2.87%  1.99201s       297  6.7071ms  6.3100ms  7.6564ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  2.69%  1.86559s       297  6.2814ms  6.1864ms  7.1012ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
  2.66%  1.84484s       297  6.2116ms  6.1330ms  7.0152ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  2.38%  1.65098s       297  5.5589ms  5.4953ms  6.2752ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
  1.47%  1.01983s       296  3.4454ms  3.3832ms  3.6530ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
  0.28%  195.46ms       295  662.57us  652.23us  699.94us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
  0.00%  875.13us       295  2.9660us  2.4000us  12.479us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  627.25us       295  2.1260us  1.3430us  9.0870us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  63.389us        82     773ns     512ns  1.2480us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

and mine :

Code:

Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.80%  6.36219s       146  43.577ms  42.978ms  44.897ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 18.86%  5.77071s       146  39.525ms  39.119ms  44.727ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
 11.66%  3.56600s       146  24.425ms  24.071ms  27.458ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 10.59%  3.24123s       146  22.200ms  21.875ms  24.802ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
  7.53%  2.30443s       146  15.784ms  15.575ms  17.894ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  5.30%  1.62276s       146  11.115ms  10.976ms  12.522ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.99%  1.52627s       146  10.454ms  10.235ms  11.892ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.21%  1.28899s       146  8.8287ms  8.4681ms  9.1675ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.48%  1.06443s       146  7.2906ms  6.9558ms  7.5275ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.05%  934.36ms       147  6.3562ms  6.2786ms  7.1199ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.68%  820.56ms       146  5.6203ms  5.5330ms  6.3415ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.64%  807.37ms       146  5.5299ms  5.4526ms  6.2354ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.63%  804.03ms       147  5.4696ms  5.4003ms  6.1889ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
  1.46%  446.72ms       146  3.0597ms  3.0059ms  3.1561ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  0.11%  33.535ms       145  231.28us  214.59us  265.21us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
  0.00%  428.88us       145  2.9570us  2.4000us  9.4720us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  320.11us       145  2.2070us  1.3440us  9.4390us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  77.406us       110     703ns

[djm34]

Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'

Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:

$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree

there is no djm34 version of x11  (at least not yet...).
I let you fight over which one is faster, it is funny to watch  

edit: I don't think there is any relationship between your version and the one of _sp who has chosen is own path
... all this for 200kh/s 

[Dotcommie]

Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin

Have you investigated whatever is going on with jackpotcoin?  I emailed you what was going on when I tried mining it.  It seemed like a nice improvement, but the pools only saw about 1/8 of the reported hash in the cmd prompt.

Thanks for your development efforts, I will definitely be messing around with this tomorrow night and Monday and will see how my rigs perform. I am just using old nvminer on jackpot currently since the gf and her family are taking up all my time this weekend :-/

**Sorry, I didn't refresh before posting, I see someone else had the same issue.  I'll get back to you if I find any more out tomorrow.

[sp_]

Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2?
Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'

Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Note: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining)

Code:

$ ccminersp.exe --help
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
         This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github)

_sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ?

But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree

I will publish the sourcecode, but it breaks compabillity with old cards, so I need some more work. I don't take all the credit. Start the miner and you willl see you name:)

Happy hashing

[tbearhere]

Using CCMINER -djm34-m7v7, average of 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
And ccminer-Maxwell.7z, the same 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
With different pools.
X11 ~2675,~2725  X13 ~2050,~2155  X15 ~1825,~1910 nist5  ~8250,~8360  quark ~4100,~5280

Im going to try over clocking more, i may get more.
   
   
   

[Blasülz]

after some trouble getting it started i got this:

x11: 2750 - 2850 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2740 - 2780 khash)
x13: 2100 - 2180 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2090 - 2110 khash)
x15: 1880 - 1910 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 1840 - 1860 khash)

750ti, Core: 1332 Mhz, Ram: 3425 Mhz

[sp_]

i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version :

Yours :

Code:

==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.95%  14.5236s       296  49.066ms  48.325ms  52.197ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
 19.27%  13.3595s       297  44.982ms  44.554ms  50.817ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
 11.74%  8.13434s       296  27.481ms  26.976ms  30.969ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
 10.63%  7.36593s       296  24.885ms  24.556ms  27.590ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
  6.99%  4.84835s       296  16.380ms  16.199ms  18.494ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  5.29%  3.66619s       297  12.344ms  12.201ms  13.939ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
  5.02%  3.47754s       296  11.748ms  11.322ms  13.248ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  4.24%  2.93967s       296  9.9313ms  9.4073ms  10.335ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
  3.51%  2.43131s       296  8.2139ms  8.0358ms  8.5024ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
  2.87%  1.99201s       297  6.7071ms  6.3100ms  7.6564ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
  2.69%  1.86559s       297  6.2814ms  6.1864ms  7.1012ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
  2.66%  1.84484s       297  6.2116ms  6.1330ms  7.0152ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
  2.38%  1.65098s       297  5.5589ms  5.4953ms  6.2752ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
  1.47%  1.01983s       296  3.4454ms  3.3832ms  3.6530ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
  0.28%  195.46ms       295  662.57us  652.23us  699.94us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
  0.00%  875.13us       295  2.9660us  2.4000us  12.479us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  627.25us       295  2.1260us  1.3430us  9.0870us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  63.389us        82     773ns     512ns  1.2480us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

and mine :

Code:

Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 20.80%  6.36219s       146  43.577ms  42.978ms  44.897ms  x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 18.86%  5.77071s       146  39.525ms  39.119ms  44.727ms  quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
 11.66%  3.56600s       146  24.425ms  24.071ms  27.458ms  x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
 10.59%  3.24123s       146  22.200ms  21.875ms  24.802ms  x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
  7.53%  2.30443s       146  15.784ms  15.575ms  17.894ms  x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  5.30%  1.62276s       146  11.115ms  10.976ms  12.522ms  quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.99%  1.52627s       146  10.454ms  10.235ms  11.892ms  x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  4.21%  1.28899s       146  8.8287ms  8.4681ms  9.1675ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.48%  1.06443s       146  7.2906ms  6.9558ms  7.5275ms  x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  3.05%  934.36ms       147  6.3562ms  6.2786ms  7.1199ms  quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.68%  820.56ms       146  5.6203ms  5.5330ms  6.3415ms  quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.64%  807.37ms       146  5.5299ms  5.4526ms  6.2354ms  quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
  2.63%  804.03ms       147  5.4696ms  5.4003ms  6.1889ms  quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
  1.46%  446.72ms       146  3.0597ms  3.0059ms  3.1561ms  x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
  0.11%  33.535ms       145  231.28us  214.59us  265.21us  cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
  0.00%  428.88us       145  2.9570us  2.4000us  9.4720us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  320.11us       145  2.2070us  1.3440us  9.4390us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  77.406us       110     703ns

My version is compiled with compute 5.0 only. The next version will be compiled with 5.2 as well. Something strange with your numbers though. I didn't modify luffa512, but my version is slower in your test. Perhaps compute 5.2 compilation will help

[go6ooo1212]

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s

[Amph]

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s

how about consumption?

[go6ooo1212]

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s

how about consumption?

Hmm I dont have any Watmeter , but MSI AB showes power usage between 85-90% on both cards

[sp_]

Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin.
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980