sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:04:09 PM |
|
Tnx. you are right.
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:22:39 PM |
|
I installed Cuda 6.5 and visual expres 2013 and getting this error when launching my bat http://prntscr.com/4xhhwgany ideas?
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:24:58 PM |
|
haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe
|
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:25:07 PM |
|
Tnx. you are right. Sent you some coins Haven't got much to spare, been nicely mining with <= 3 GPUs for a few months now. Hope you'll like the few beers you can get from that haha nvm, when SP sent it to me and said change to exe i thought he attached the actual exe file, so i changed the zipped file to .exe
xD
|
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:43:53 PM |
|
Unfortunately there is no improvement on my EVGA GTX 970 Before OC I was getting 5700 KH/S and after OC around 6100 KH/S with this new ccminer it is the same Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2? Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:47:50 PM Last edit: October 19, 2014, 12:47:39 AM by Epsylon3 |
|
Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2? Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'
Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesNote: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining) $ ccminersp.exe --help *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. *** This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github) _sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ? But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:55:50 PM |
|
Actually thats the one I've been using for weeks ya I thought this might even add more to it So is 6200 my max or do u see further improvements in yours? ive rread in other threads that having the miner keep the card in P0 state, and memory up to 3500 helps. I was able to replicate this iwth 'nvidia inspector' and saw some improvement, but it makes my computer hang too much
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 18, 2014, 11:02:57 PM Last edit: October 18, 2014, 11:45:53 PM by tbearhere |
|
Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin
great wow but hashatme has my worker difficulty set so high im throwing in 50mh/s and that pool is showing 10mh/s.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
October 19, 2014, 01:48:46 AM |
|
i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version : Yours : ==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark ==30576== Profiling result: Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name 20.95% 14.5236s 296 49.066ms 48.325ms 52.197ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi 19.27% 13.3595s 297 44.982ms 44.554ms 50.817ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad 11.74% 8.13434s 296 27.481ms 26.976ms 30.969ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u 10.63% 7.36593s 296 24.885ms 24.556ms 27.590ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un 6.99% 4.84835s 296 16.380ms 16.199ms 18.494ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, 5.29% 3.66619s 297 12.344ms 12.201ms 13.939ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi 5.02% 3.47754s 296 11.748ms 11.322ms 13.248ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns 4.24% 2.93967s 296 9.9313ms 9.4073ms 10.335ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, 3.51% 2.43131s 296 8.2139ms 8.0358ms 8.5024ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, 2.87% 1.99201s 297 6.7071ms 6.3100ms 7.6564ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns 2.69% 1.86559s 297 6.2814ms 6.1864ms 7.1012ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u 2.66% 1.84484s 297 6.2116ms 6.1330ms 7.0152ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, 2.38% 1.65098s 297 5.5589ms 5.4953ms 6.2752ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u 1.47% 1.01983s 296 3.4454ms 3.3832ms 3.6530ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns 0.28% 195.46ms 295 662.57us 652.23us 699.94us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig 0.00% 875.13us 295 2.9660us 2.4000us 12.479us [CUDA memset] 0.00% 627.25us 295 2.1260us 1.3430us 9.0870us [CUDA memcpy DtoH] 0.00% 63.389us 82 773ns 512ns 1.2480us [CUDA memcpy HtoD] and mine : Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name 20.80% 6.36219s 146 43.577ms 42.978ms 44.897ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 18.86% 5.77071s 146 39.525ms 39.119ms 44.727ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*) 11.66% 3.56600s 146 24.425ms 24.071ms 27.458ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 10.59% 3.24123s 146 22.200ms 21.875ms 24.802ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*) 7.53% 2.30443s 146 15.784ms 15.575ms 17.894ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 5.30% 1.62276s 146 11.115ms 10.976ms 12.522ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 4.99% 1.52627s 146 10.454ms 10.235ms 11.892ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 4.21% 1.28899s 146 8.8287ms 8.4681ms 9.1675ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 3.48% 1.06443s 146 7.2906ms 6.9558ms 7.5275ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 3.05% 934.36ms 147 6.3562ms 6.2786ms 7.1199ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.68% 820.56ms 146 5.6203ms 5.5330ms 6.3415ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.64% 807.37ms 146 5.5299ms 5.4526ms 6.2354ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.63% 804.03ms 147 5.4696ms 5.4003ms 6.1889ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*) 1.46% 446.72ms 146 3.0597ms 3.0059ms 3.1561ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 0.11% 33.535ms 145 231.28us 214.59us 265.21us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*) 0.00% 428.88us 145 2.9570us 2.4000us 9.4720us [CUDA memset] 0.00% 320.11us 145 2.2070us 1.3440us 9.4390us [CUDA memcpy DtoH] 0.00% 77.406us 110 703ns
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 19, 2014, 02:02:44 AM Last edit: October 19, 2014, 03:42:07 AM by djm34 |
|
Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2? Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'
Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesNote: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining) $ ccminersp.exe --help *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. *** This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github) _sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ? But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree there is no djm34 version of x11 (at least not yet...). I let you fight over which one is faster, it is funny to watch edit: I don't think there is any relationship between your version and the one of _sp who has chosen is own path ... all this for 200kh/s
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Dotcommie
|
|
October 19, 2014, 05:22:31 AM |
|
Yeah. The x13 performance is not so good. The next build will be bether. Try jackpointcoin
Have you investigated whatever is going on with jackpotcoin? I emailed you what was going on when I tried mining it. It seemed like a nice improvement, but the pools only saw about 1/8 of the reported hash in the cmd prompt. Thanks for your development efforts, I will definitely be messing around with this tomorrow night and Monday and will see how my rigs perform. I am just using old nvminer on jackpot currently since the gf and her family are taking up all my time this weekend :-/ **Sorry, I didn't refresh before posting, I see someone else had the same issue. I'll get back to you if I find any more out tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 19, 2014, 07:26:00 AM |
|
Do you think its because the GTX 970 uses compute 5.2? Even when I installed the CUDA 6.5 it told me 'you have no compatible card for this software'
Yep, there is a difference when compiled with 5.2, try my 5.2 binary here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesNote: 1.4.5 is almost ready with a new curl, i detected some hangs problems with the 1.4.4 (mainly in solo mining) $ ccminersp.exe --help *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. *** This is the forked version 1.4.5 (tpruvot@github) _sp: Thanks to take all the credits, my version was already faster than djm34 one on x11, what did you change (remember its GPL code) ? But if you plan to release changes on github, i totally agree I will publish the sourcecode, but it breaks compabillity with old cards, so I need some more work. I don't take all the credit. Start the miner and you willl see you name:) Happy hashing
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 19, 2014, 11:13:28 AM |
|
Using CCMINER -djm34-m7v7, average of 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining. And ccminer-Maxwell.7z, the same 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining. With different pools. X11 ~2675,~2725 X13 ~2050,~2155 X15 ~1825,~1910 nist5 ~8250,~8360 quark ~4100,~5280
Im going to try over clocking more, i may get more.
|
|
|
|
Blasülz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2014, 11:38:52 AM |
|
after some trouble getting it started i got this:
x11: 2750 - 2850 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2740 - 2780 khash) x13: 2100 - 2180 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2090 - 2110 khash) x15: 1880 - 1910 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 1840 - 1860 khash)
750ti, Core: 1332 Mhz, Ram: 3425 Mhz
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 19, 2014, 11:44:40 AM |
|
i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version : Yours : ==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark ==30576== Profiling result: Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name 20.95% 14.5236s 296 49.066ms 48.325ms 52.197ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi 19.27% 13.3595s 297 44.982ms 44.554ms 50.817ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad 11.74% 8.13434s 296 27.481ms 26.976ms 30.969ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u 10.63% 7.36593s 296 24.885ms 24.556ms 27.590ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un 6.99% 4.84835s 296 16.380ms 16.199ms 18.494ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, 5.29% 3.66619s 297 12.344ms 12.201ms 13.939ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi 5.02% 3.47754s 296 11.748ms 11.322ms 13.248ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns 4.24% 2.93967s 296 9.9313ms 9.4073ms 10.335ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, 3.51% 2.43131s 296 8.2139ms 8.0358ms 8.5024ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, 2.87% 1.99201s 297 6.7071ms 6.3100ms 7.6564ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns 2.69% 1.86559s 297 6.2814ms 6.1864ms 7.1012ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u 2.66% 1.84484s 297 6.2116ms 6.1330ms 7.0152ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, 2.38% 1.65098s 297 5.5589ms 5.4953ms 6.2752ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u 1.47% 1.01983s 296 3.4454ms 3.3832ms 3.6530ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns 0.28% 195.46ms 295 662.57us 652.23us 699.94us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig 0.00% 875.13us 295 2.9660us 2.4000us 12.479us [CUDA memset] 0.00% 627.25us 295 2.1260us 1.3430us 9.0870us [CUDA memcpy DtoH] 0.00% 63.389us 82 773ns 512ns 1.2480us [CUDA memcpy HtoD] and mine : Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name 20.80% 6.36219s 146 43.577ms 42.978ms 44.897ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 18.86% 5.77071s 146 39.525ms 39.119ms 44.727ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*) 11.66% 3.56600s 146 24.425ms 24.071ms 27.458ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 10.59% 3.24123s 146 22.200ms 21.875ms 24.802ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*) 7.53% 2.30443s 146 15.784ms 15.575ms 17.894ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 5.30% 1.62276s 146 11.115ms 10.976ms 12.522ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 4.99% 1.52627s 146 10.454ms 10.235ms 11.892ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 4.21% 1.28899s 146 8.8287ms 8.4681ms 9.1675ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 3.48% 1.06443s 146 7.2906ms 6.9558ms 7.5275ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 3.05% 934.36ms 147 6.3562ms 6.2786ms 7.1199ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.68% 820.56ms 146 5.6203ms 5.5330ms 6.3415ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.64% 807.37ms 146 5.5299ms 5.4526ms 6.2354ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*) 2.63% 804.03ms 147 5.4696ms 5.4003ms 6.1889ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*) 1.46% 446.72ms 146 3.0597ms 3.0059ms 3.1561ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*) 0.11% 33.535ms 145 231.28us 214.59us 265.21us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*) 0.00% 428.88us 145 2.9570us 2.4000us 9.4720us [CUDA memset] 0.00% 320.11us 145 2.2070us 1.3440us 9.4390us [CUDA memcpy DtoH] 0.00% 77.406us 110 703ns My version is compiled with compute 5.0 only. The next version will be compiled with 5.2 as well. Something strange with your numbers though. I didn't modify luffa512, but my version is slower in your test. Perhaps compute 5.2 compilation will help
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
October 19, 2014, 02:20:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
October 19, 2014, 02:28:33 PM |
|
Hmm I dont have any Watmeter , but MSI AB showes power usage between 85-90% on both cards
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 19, 2014, 02:43:38 PM |
|
Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin. I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
|
|
|
|
|