20th 3dMACD bar started GREEN!

[pabloangello]

After each bubble (at peak) there was this scheme: red -> green -> red -> greeeeeeeeeeen Bubble
And now we are in this second green stage (but with a very small one red bar).
It will not give you 100% certainity that there will be new bubble soon anyway...

And that red bar could be ignored because it was just oscillation around 0 (its value was -0.5649 @Bitstamp).

BTT should buy another servers to handle enormous wave of newcomers soon : D

[ask]

New green bar...

[Wary]

New green bar...

Not true gentleman

[coinableS]

New green bar...

Not true gentleman

Or it could be like the 2012 spike from $4 to $12.



Who knows what will happen, this is freakin' Bitcoin bitches!

[SmoothCurves]

New green bar...

Not true gentleman

Or it could be like the 2012 spike from $4 to $12.



Who knows what will happen, this is freakin' Bitcoin bitches!

All of 2014 feels like the crash after the ath 2011

[calchuchesta]

New green bar...

Not true gentleman

Or it could be like the 2012 spike from $4 to $12.



Who knows what will happen, this is freakin' Bitcoin bitches!

All of 2014 feels like the crash after the ath 2011

Time to pick the latest cheap coins.

[pabloangello]

No more updates here?; p

[poncom]

No more updates here?; p

The 13th 3dMACD bar probably started RED and ruined everything.

[ask]

No more updates here?; p

The 13th 3dMACD bar probably started RED and ruined everything.

No. Tomorrow's bar will be green too.

More important: also 1w MACD is moving towards green area. I expect that we will see first green bar on 8th of December.

[yayayo]

No more updates here?; p

The 13th 3dMACD bar probably started RED and ruined everything.

No. Tomorrow's bar will be green too.

More important: also 1w MACD is moving towards green area. I expect that we will see first green bar on 8th of December.

I just want to point out that it will not be the 13th bar, because there has been a tiny red bar inbetween. This tiny "aberration" would have caused an automatic trading system based on the indicator in question going short, involving losses.

Stating that the 3dMACD is a perfect trading indicator while simply ignoring "false signals" is deceptive.

ya.ya.yo!

[smoothie]

New green bar...

Not true gentleman

Or it could be like the 2012 spike from $4 to $12.



Who knows what will happen, this is freakin' Bitcoin bitches!

All of 2014 feels like the crash after the ath 2011

I disagree. This long bear market is similar to 2011 but not as drastic.

[Wary]

Future will show you that this is a perfect long term trading indicator. Your comment about tiny red bar - it depends how inteligent is automated trading system. My simply ignores it and takes it as noise.

Why make an automated trading system for long term trades?

[Wary]

Future will show you that this is a perfect long term trading indicator. Your comment about tiny red bar - it depends how inteligent is automated trading system. My simply ignores it and takes it as noise.

Why make an automated trading system for long term trades?

It was reply to initial statement:

"This tiny "aberration" would have caused an automatic trading system based on the indicator in question going short, involving losses."

Yes, I agree that we dont need automated trading system, we need just common sense.

[yayayo]

Future will show you that this is a perfect long term trading indicator. Your comment about tiny red bar - it depends how inteligent is automated trading system. My simply ignores it and takes it as noise.

Why make an automated trading system for long term trades?

It was reply to initial statement:

"This tiny "aberration" would have caused an automatic trading system based on the indicator in question going short, involving losses."

Yes, I agree that we dont need automated trading system, we need just common sense.

The questions is however - how do you define "common sense"?

Why do you ignore the tiny red bar? Will you always ignore a tiny red bar? Do you have a clearly defined rule set for "noise" reduction?

If you have a trading system  - in this case it was claimed that the trading system is based solely on the 3dMACD (because it's such a "perfect long term indicator") - and this trading systems generates a sell signal you can't just arbitrarily ignore that signal. If you find it necessary to do so, you are not following the trading system and are in fact invalidating the claim that the trading system is perfect.

ya.ya.yo!

[lyth0s]

Future will show you that this is a perfect long term trading indicator. Your comment about tiny red bar - it depends how inteligent is automated trading system. My simply ignores it and takes it as noise.

Why make an automated trading system for long term trades?

It was reply to initial statement:

"This tiny "aberration" would have caused an automatic trading system based on the indicator in question going short, involving losses."

Yes, I agree that we dont need automated trading system, we need just common sense.

The questions is however - how do you define "common sense"?

Why do you ignore the tiny red bar? Will you always ignore a tiny red bar? Do you have a clearly defined rule set for "noise" reduction?

If you have a trading system  - in this case it was claimed that the trading system is based solely on the 3dMACD (because it's such a "perfect long term indicator") - and this trading systems generates a sell signal you can't just arbitrarily ignore that signal. If you find it necessary to do so, you are not following the trading system and are in fact invalidating the claim that the trading system is perfect.

ya.ya.yo!

Maybe "common sense" is being defined here as realizing that a single small red bar when the 3D MACD is just turning green (and near zero), and now surrounded by greens, should be considered as noise.

I'm not a pro trader, but from a statistics perspective I see it as a deviation ask's indicator, but the question becomes "is this statistically significant", in which there are means to determine that...

[yefi]

Why do you ignore the tiny red bar? Will you always ignore a tiny red bar? Do you have a clearly defined rule set for "noise" reduction?

If you have a trading system  - in this case it was claimed that the trading system is based solely on the 3dMACD (because it's such a "perfect long term indicator") - and this trading systems generates a sell signal you can't just arbitrarily ignore that signal. If you find it necessary to do so, you are not following the trading system and are in fact invalidating the claim that the trading system is perfect.

ya.ya.yo!

If the definition doesn't fit, change the definition. One of the first rules of politics I think

ye.fi.mo!

[davidorentol]

... and new green bar ...

so many.....such green bars.....so bitcoin....wow   

[lyth0s]

... and new green bar ...

Should we be worried that the 3D MACD histogram reached a peak of 19, but now hovering in the 16 area without a large or steady increase? I'm new to assessing markets based on MACD so advice is appreciated.

[bitcoinbelieve]

Is there updated chart avail?

[pabloangello]

Is there updated chart avail?

Lol just check lets say https://bitcoinwisdom.com with MACD indicator in Settings.