Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 06:10:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: a problem with Blade (10.7GH)  (Read 1354 times)
alicea (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 501



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 11:32:48 AM
 #1

Hello

one of my Blade Erupters got its RJ 45 (internet) socket broken, so I've changed it to new one. Now after having it repaired I can see its interface (192.168.1.7:8000) but it doesn't mine (the interface shows 0GH and the blade is not seen in bfgminer). Restarting (by restart button) works, but doesn't help. Restarting bfgminer doesn't help neither. Other Blades are seen by bfgminer and work great.
Is it broken or what? What could I try or check?

volosator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 03:32:26 PM
 #2

It is not worth it to run the blade anymore. W/GHs is too high.

it should work if you can ping the device externally.
alicea (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 01, 2014, 06:25:18 PM
 #3

It is not worth it to run the blade anymore. W/GHs is too high.

it should work if you can ping the device externally.

Yes, I can ping it:

alicja@alicja-desktop ~/bfgminer $ ping 192.168.1.7
PING 192.168.1.7 (192.168.1.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=6 ttl=100 time=1.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=7 ttl=100 time=1.67 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=8 ttl=100 time=1.44 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=9 ttl=100 time=1.50 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=10 ttl=100 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=11 ttl=100 time=1.99 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=12 ttl=100 time=1.70 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=13 ttl=100 time=1.40 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=14 ttl=100 time=1.78 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.7 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 9 received, 35% packet loss, time 13048ms

loshia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 01, 2014, 07:09:32 PM
 #4

It is not worth it to run the blade anymore. W/GHs is too high.

it should work if you can ping the device externally.

Yes, I can ping it:

alicja@alicja-desktop ~/bfgminer $ ping 192.168.1.7
PING 192.168.1.7 (192.168.1.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=6 ttl=100 time=1.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=7 ttl=100 time=1.67 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=8 ttl=100 time=1.44 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=9 ttl=100 time=1.50 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=10 ttl=100 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=11 ttl=100 time=1.99 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=12 ttl=100 time=1.70 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=13 ttl=100 time=1.40 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.7: icmp_req=14 ttl=100 time=1.78 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.7 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 9 received, 35% packet loss, time 13048ms

35% packet loss ?/??? with small packet
It will not mine dude...
try ping 192.168.1.7 -s 1472 --you will see 70-80% packet loss


Please help the Led Boy aka Bicknellski to make us a nice Christmas led tree and pay WASP membership fee here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643999.msg7191563#msg7191563
And remember Bicknellski is not collecting money from community;D
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 01, 2014, 07:12:45 PM
 #5

The only part I ever had trouble with these is the fuse, I burnt it out before.  I don't that is your problem here but you might look at the fuse to be sure.

I had a a few of these long ago and 2 had fuse problems, I had to pug a bigger one in.
wpgdeez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 20, 2014, 12:04:46 AM
 #6

Check the voltages of each bank since they are adjustable?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!