Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 04:07:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [IPO-Bytecent] Iconic Expert - Blackcoin SCAMMER - Bittrex  (Read 7447 times)
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 08, 2014, 04:22:03 AM
 #41

@fapman1
lol you can keep these pics to your self to warm you at the lonely nights rather than keep spreading it here at this thread and at Never buy ico: ByteCent, EQX, Sys, Craig, Vior... thread as well whenever anyone is mentioning bytecent as a scam.

you do not spam other scam coins threads with your lousy trolling, maybe another desperate bytecent holder?

Get a life

You make it too easy m8. I'll hit the other thread also.  Not a bloody thing you can do about it either.  Feels good to turn it back on you FUDing wankers.  I forgot about the other side of the road, here's a pic for you:

Dude grow up, I'm not here to waste my time arguing empty minded topics neither with you nor with anyone else.

FUDding can't be considered so as long as there are evidences/threads/snapshots/etc.. available. You will surprise me if you even understand this sentence lol.

Anyway you are welcome to my ignore list where you, your master IE, his worshippers, other scammers, fudders and thieves belong.


Now you can back to your daily activities fapman1

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2014, 10:28:07 AM
Last edit: November 08, 2014, 10:38:46 AM by djm34
 #42

Duh ... boobies!


@fapman1
lol you can keep these pics to your self to warm you at the lonely nights rather than keep spreading it here at this thread and at Never buy ico: ByteCent, EQX, Sys, Craig, Vior... thread as well whenever anyone is mentioning bytecent as a scam.

you do not spam other scam coins threads with your lousy trolling, maybe another desperate bytecent holder?

Get a life

You make it too easy m8. I'll hit the other thread also.  Not a bloody thing you can do about it either.  Feels good to turn it back on you FUDing wankers.  I forgot about the other side of the road, here's a pic for you:

But when

Dude grow up, I'm not here to waste my time arguing empty minded topics neither with you nor with anyone else.

FUDding can't be considered so as long as there are evidences/threads/snapshots/etc.. available. You will surprise me if you even understand this sentence lol.

Anyway you are welcome to my ignore list where you, your master IE, his worshippers, other scammers, fudders and thieves belong.


Now you can back to your daily activities fapman1


At least trolling with unrelated photo should make you easy to report to the mods...
You are probably working with IE or getting your part of the scammed money.
You came with the "he's a changed man" (meaning, he already spent the money he scammed from blackcoin community 3 months ago and needs more  Grin ) but after that the only thing you have been able to post was unrelated photo.
You clearly didn't earn the money bytecent team gave you for trolling around.

on topic: as a gpu dev. I find the coin interesting, but knowing that the dev team already scammed people, I won't lose my time working on a gpu miner (because it is obvious that coin value will go down right after the ICO is over and additional premined coin has been dumped).
Well I don't care a lot if very naive lose money in this scam (well did you already went to a scam coin thread and try to explain, it is a scam... most of the people will just tell you to gtfo... so they deserve what will happen to them...  Grin), but clearly I don't want to have my time stolen by scammers...
 


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
KryptoKings
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 506



View Profile
November 08, 2014, 05:38:33 PM
 #43

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqibidmVfaw&feature=youtu.be

watch this interview with IconicExpert. It is all explained.
Honeypot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 08:48:12 PM
 #44

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins   Smiley

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.
sofu (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1085

Degenerate Crypto Gambler


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 11:05:23 PM
 #45


Cryptoleonardo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 09, 2014, 11:14:27 PM
 #46

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins   Smiley

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.


Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.
Honeypot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 10, 2014, 12:16:36 AM
 #47

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins   Smiley

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.


Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.

More then one way to go about doing it. It's all about sentiment manipulation. Make em doubt, break the doubt, trigger panic buys, dump on buys, betray expectations while each and every one of the buys is profiting him one way or another etc each and every time hooking people in to trust and buy from byc.

I thought that 50btc 'success condition' is ridiculous for a 1500 btc sized IPO. Would be really easy for some dev to just 'buy' his own ipo that much and call it a success (btc which he will get back) - and who could prove it wasn't him?

The low number bought during this ipo is not a proof of anything - only proof of a beginning of manipulation.

One very bad mistake though - calling something crowdfunding or ipo is a very very easy way to get the authorities on your ass if you don't know what you are doing. He might think he knows the ropes about security laws etc and can't be prosecuted, but forget that money and law are two different things. Especially when anyone who is really interested can completely destroy him one way or another if they wanted to, and he just gave them the ropes to hang him with.

moxl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 10, 2014, 02:45:59 AM
 #48

Iconic Expert is Scammer
Thomas-s
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 500


Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network


View Profile
November 11, 2014, 08:38:24 PM
 #49

The wallet is also closed source, be careful.






             ,gaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaag,
           ,aP8b    _,dYba,       ,adPb,_    d8Ya,
         ,aP"  Yb_,dP"   "Yba, ,adP"   "Yb,_dP  "Ya,
       ,aP"    _88"         )888(         "88_    "Ya,
     ,aP"   _,dP"Yb      ,adP"8"Yba,      dP"Yb,_   "Ya,
   ,aPYb _,dP8    Yb  ,adP"   8   "Yba,  dP    8Yb,_ dPYa,
 ,aP"  YdP" dP     YbdP"      8      "YbdP     Yb "YbP  "Ya,
I8aaaaaa8aaa8baaaaaa88aaaaaaaa8aaaaaaaa88aaaaaad8aaa8aaaaaa8I
`Yb,   d8a, Ya      d8b,      8      ,d8b      aP ,a8b   ,dP'
  "Yb,dP "Ya "8,   dI "Yb,    8    ,dP" Ib   ,8" aP" Yb,dP"
    "Y8,   "YaI8, ,8'   "Yb,  8  ,dP"   `8, ,8IaP"   ,8P"
      "Yb,   `"Y8ad'      "Yb,8,dP"      `ba8P"'   ,dP"
        "Yb,    `"8,        "Y8P"        ,8"'    ,dP"
          "Yb,    `8,         8         ,8'    ,dP"
            "Yb,   `Ya        8        aP'   ,dP"
              "Yb,   "8,      8      ,8"   ,dP"
                "Yb,  `8,     8     ,8'  ,dP" 
                  "Yb, `Ya    8    aP' ,dP"   
                    "Yb, "8,  8  ,8" ,dP"
                      "Yb,`8, 8 ,8',dP"
                        "Yb,Ya8aP,dP"
                          "Y88888P"
                            "Y8P"
                              "

Free TON





PEER-TO-PEER MULTY-BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEM
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▬▬▬▬TON SURF - OFFICIAL WALLET ▬▬▬▬





        ▄███████████████████▄
        █████████████████████
▄█████  █████████████████████
██████  ████             ████
███     █████████████████████
██████  ████             ████
██████  █████████████████████
███     █████████████████████
███████ ▀███████████████████▀
▀███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄       ▀████
  ████▌                 ██ 
  ▐██▌                     
   █▌








TELEGRAM
FORUM
WIKI
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 02:37:47 AM
 #50

more info about iconic coin here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710215.0
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:13:37 AM
 #51

Better to read this: THE BYTECENT DISASTER
1echo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

scams hunter!


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:28:01 AM
 #52

anyboyd bought into this scam LOL ?

sdersdf3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:32:44 AM
 #53

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins   Smiley

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.


Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.


He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Tired of this stuff? Consider Nectarcoin:
http://cryptoasian.com/sweet-nectarcoin/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812124.msg9090897#msg9090897
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:35:37 AM
 #54

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.
Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -. 



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:49:24 AM
 #55

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.
Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?


These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.
kozmos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 04:51:28 AM
 #56

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.
Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?


These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.
dload.1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1004

BTC


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 07:30:37 AM
 #57

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.
Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?


These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.
something was definitely not right about that launch a few were able to mine while alot were not and no difficulty adjustment. Roll Eyes
sdersdf3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 12, 2014, 07:46:32 AM
 #58

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.
Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?


These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.
something was definitely not right about that launch a few were able to mine while alot were not and no difficulty adjustment. Roll Eyes


another day in crypto

fox19891989
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 14, 2014, 08:52:22 AM
 #59

Scammer IE's coin seems dead Cheesy
KidCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 14, 2014, 04:30:35 PM
 #60

You guys think too much. If it's an anonymous ICO, it's a scam. That's all you need to know.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!