[IPO-Bytecent] Iconic Expert - Blackcoin SCAMMER - Bittrex

[kozmos]

@fapman1
lol you can keep these pics to your self to warm you at the lonely nights rather than keep spreading it here at this thread and at Never buy ico: ByteCent, EQX, Sys, Craig, Vior... thread as well whenever anyone is mentioning bytecent as a scam.

you do not spam other scam coins threads with your lousy trolling, maybe another desperate bytecent holder?

Get a life

You make it too easy m8. I'll hit the other thread also.  Not a bloody thing you can do about it either.  Feels good to turn it back on you FUDing wankers.  I forgot about the other side of the road, here's a pic for you:

Dude grow up, I'm not here to waste my time arguing empty minded topics neither with you nor with anyone else.

FUDding can't be considered so as long as there are evidences/threads/snapshots/etc.. available. You will surprise me if you even understand this sentence lol.

Anyway you are welcome to my ignore list where you, your master IE, his worshippers, other scammers, fudders and thieves belong.


Now you can back to your daily activities fapman1

[djm34]

Duh ... boobies!

@fapman1
lol you can keep these pics to your self to warm you at the lonely nights rather than keep spreading it here at this thread and at Never buy ico: ByteCent, EQX, Sys, Craig, Vior... thread as well whenever anyone is mentioning bytecent as a scam.

you do not spam other scam coins threads with your lousy trolling, maybe another desperate bytecent holder?

Get a life

You make it too easy m8. I'll hit the other thread also.  Not a bloody thing you can do about it either.  Feels good to turn it back on you FUDing wankers.  I forgot about the other side of the road, here's a pic for you:

But when

Dude grow up, I'm not here to waste my time arguing empty minded topics neither with you nor with anyone else.

FUDding can't be considered so as long as there are evidences/threads/snapshots/etc.. available. You will surprise me if you even understand this sentence lol.

Anyway you are welcome to my ignore list where you, your master IE, his worshippers, other scammers, fudders and thieves belong.


Now you can back to your daily activities fapman1

At least trolling with unrelated photo should make you easy to report to the mods...
You are probably working with IE or getting your part of the scammed money.
You came with the "he's a changed man" (meaning, he already spent the money he scammed from blackcoin community 3 months ago and needs more   ) but after that the only thing you have been able to post was unrelated photo.
You clearly didn't earn the money bytecent team gave you for trolling around.

on topic: as a gpu dev. I find the coin interesting, but knowing that the dev team already scammed people, I won't lose my time working on a gpu miner (because it is obvious that coin value will go down right after the ICO is over and additional premined coin has been dumped).
Well I don't care a lot if very naive lose money in this scam (well did you already went to a scam coin thread and try to explain, it is a scam... most of the people will just tell you to gtfo... so they deserve what will happen to them...  ), but clearly I don't want to have my time stolen by scammers...
 

[KryptoKings]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqibidmVfaw&feature=youtu.be

watch this interview with IconicExpert. It is all explained.

[Honeypot]

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins  

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.

[sofu]

[Cryptoleonardo]

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins  

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.

Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.

[Honeypot]

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins   

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.

Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.

More then one way to go about doing it. It's all about sentiment manipulation. Make em doubt, break the doubt, trigger panic buys, dump on buys, betray expectations while each and every one of the buys is profiting him one way or another etc each and every time hooking people in to trust and buy from byc.

I thought that 50btc 'success condition' is ridiculous for a 1500 btc sized IPO. Would be really easy for some dev to just 'buy' his own ipo that much and call it a success (btc which he will get back) - and who could prove it wasn't him?

The low number bought during this ipo is not a proof of anything - only proof of a beginning of manipulation.

One very bad mistake though - calling something crowdfunding or ipo is a very very easy way to get the authorities on your ass if you don't know what you are doing. He might think he knows the ropes about security laws etc and can't be prosecuted, but forget that money and law are two different things. Especially when anyone who is really interested can completely destroy him one way or another if they wanted to, and he just gave them the ropes to hang him with.

[moxl]

Iconic Expert is Scammer

[Thomas-s]

The wallet is also closed source, be careful.

[EmilioMann]

more info about iconic coin here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710215.0

[kozmos]

Better to read this: THE BYTECENT DISASTER

[1echo]

anyboyd bought into this scam LOL ?

[sdersdf3]

People are understandably wary of ICO and Crowd funded coins.

I propose from now on that any Dev wishing to launch such a coin should make their real name and contact details publicly available, If they have nothing to hide and don't intend ripping people off then there is no reason for them to stay anonymous.

Their coin may well fail, but if they've done the right thing in the first place then it drastically reduces the chance of it being a scam.

I'm sick and tired of peopling losing money here to greedy Dev's, personally I never have and never will invest in any ICO coin, but that's just because I preferred the old method of actually mining coins  

I fully agree. If you are a serious professional and is committed to the launch of a crowdfunded venture, you are obligated to disclose your public identity. IE seems to have history of consistently earning the distrust and some substantial proof of his fraudulent behavior. At the very least, it proves a bad PR handling.

Some people, underdogs that they are, have been working hard and honestly but did not ever get the attention they deserved due to pump and dumps overshadowing the crypto scene this year.

Those same people have been public since they started on the crypto scene. Full identity disclosure, licensed and registered legally with documents to prove it all.

But they were ignored because of the fact that their professional approach didn't 'guarantee' enormous profits like pump and dump anonymous scams.

With the scene changing, it would be a very sad statement if IE was trying to manipulate the trust of the people and their desire for an open and public project with a fully public developer in order to conduct another dump scam on crypto.

The real honest people of crypto have been around since the start of their career with everything out in public. Going 'honest' now (even now he refuses to show his face on the video) sounds like a marketing gimmick at the very least, more likely a move to try and take advantage of the people's desperation to find an 'honest' project. Also, why is the comment section disabled in that video?

The coin is closed source. The dev has some dubious history. He is not public at all. His 'expertise' is in question with all the coins in the past that failed and is now forgotten as pump and dump coins on twitter and elsewhere. For an 'honest' dev, he has cut off too many lines of communication where he is supposed to give answers. It's his job to manage the venture.

Last of all, he is promoting himself as 'honest' all of a sudden when it's very convenient to do so. Real professionals and honest people have been at it quietly for months and years now with their public profile out in full view.

Too many red flags from a 3rd party point of view.

Lol, I think if he want fu... the people he would change nick, becouse he would collect more btc than on this ICO, look at it only 63 btc.

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Tired of this stuff? Consider Nectarcoin:
http://cryptoasian.com/sweet-nectarcoin/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812124.msg9090897#msg9090897

[kozmos]

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -. 



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

[barabbas]

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

[kozmos]

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.

[dload.1]

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.

something was definitely not right about that launch a few were able to mine while alot were not and no difficulty adjustment.

[sdersdf3]

He didn't even submit to POD, and looks like someone(s) mined a lot more than what he said could be mined per day/hour.

Maybe the paragraph in red will give you an idea about how to do this.

We all here posted some undeniable evidences about his scams.

But yet at his tweeter he wrote the haters by this have increased the value of his coin. lol wtf.

Seriously I'm not joking when I say he needs an immediate mentality check cause we are talking about a late stage of delusion - harry potter syndrome -.  



EDIT: I'm wondering about something else, based on that kid's history.

What if that scammer will make CPU miner available for public while he and his " inner circle " group will be using some sort of a hidden GPU miner to earn big chunks of bytecent only for their own?

These statements (in red), which seemed -to me- completely outlandish when made, seems quite uncanny right now, unfortunately.

With closed source coin, everything is possible and does not look outlandish. Just saying.

something was definitely not right about that launch a few were able to mine while alot were not and no difficulty adjustment.

another day in crypto

[fox19891989]

Scammer IE's coin seems dead

[KidCrypto]

You guys think too much. If it's an anonymous ICO, it's a scam. That's all you need to know.