Why was I banned for ten days for posting articles in politics and society?

[dank]

I to intend on repaying squall the remaining debt but I need to get things rolling for me in order to do it in the most efficient fashion.  It will be a lot easier to start repaying squall once I have land and an environment to produce music.

[Vod]

I to intend on repaying squall the remaining debt but I need to get things rolling for me in order to do it in the most efficient fashion.  It will be a lot easier to start repaying squall once I have land and an environment to produce music.

You will never get any land until you believe in yourself and sell your motorcycle to pay squall.

[dank]

I am still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned..

[Buffer Overflow]

I am still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned..

We are still awaiting for you to pay off your debt, which is infinitely more important.

[Wattda]

In my opinion, there is little wisdom in pointing out the splinter in your brother's eye instead of giving careful attention to the beam in your own.

This has been the wisest post I have read concerning the subject matter.

[Buffer Overflow]

In my opinion, there is little wisdom in pointing out the splinter in your brother's eye instead of giving careful attention to the beam in your own.

This has been the wisest post I have read concerning the subject matter.

If your seeking wisdom, dank threads are a poor choice. They exist for light entertainment purposes only, nothing else.

[dank]

I am still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned..

We are still awaiting for you to pay off your debt, which is infinitely more important.

Are you a staff member?

In my opinion, there is little wisdom in pointing out the splinter in your brother's eye instead of giving careful attention to the beam in your own.

This has been the wisest post I have read concerning the subject matter.

If your seeking wisdom, dank threads are a poor choice. They exist for light entertainment purposes only, nothing else.

The fact that you feel the need to justify such a thing only shows your fear of higher philosophy.

[Buffer Overflow]

I am still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned..

We are still awaiting for you to pay off your debt, which is infinitely more important.

Are you a staff member?

No. Just pointing out how maybe you should treat others how you wish to be treated.

In my opinion, there is little wisdom in pointing out the splinter in your brother's eye instead of giving careful attention to the beam in your own.

This has been the wisest post I have read concerning the subject matter.

If your seeking wisdom, dank threads are a poor choice. They exist for light entertainment purposes only, nothing else.

The fact that you feel the need to justify such a thing only shows your fear of higher philosophy.

Oh come now dank, let's not pretend we don't both know about our unsaid agreement. You entertain us and we give you the attention you crave in return. It works well, but you need to come up with some new material, I'm starting to get bored.
You've milked the music festival comedy sketch to oblivion now, just getting tiresome. Think of some fresh ideas.

[dank]

So, still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned for posting informative articles that challenge the way society perceives existence.

[the joint]

I am still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned..

We are still awaiting for you to pay off your debt, which is infinitely more important.

Are you a staff member?

In my opinion, there is little wisdom in pointing out the splinter in your brother's eye instead of giving careful attention to the beam in your own.

This has been the wisest post I have read concerning the subject matter.

If your seeking wisdom, dank threads are a poor choice. They exist for light entertainment purposes only, nothing else.

The fact that you feel the need to justify such a thing only shows your fear of higher philosophy.

Hypocritical that here you stand, deferring and consenting authority to a staff member of a closed, regulated forum.  Remember all those things I had been telling you about your tendency to jump on whatever side of the fence is most convenient for you? ...All those things I had been saying about you contradicting yourself?

Your "higher philosophy" is a bunch of contradictory nonsense, and it only serves the purpose of making you feel better by trying to justify the awful situation you've created for yourself.

[Buffer Overflow]

Hypocritical that here you stand, deferring and consenting authority to a staff member of a closed, regulated forum.

Danks next move will be to play the free speech card.
But this won't work because, as "the joint" correctly pointed out, this forum is closed and regulated and if the staff don't like what you say they can boot you out.
This is no different if you was in my house and if I didn't like what you was saying I would be free to boot you out into the street.

Naturally dank won't see it like this and scream his fake persecution.

[dank]

Wonderful.  And the cycle continues.  Bitcoin leads to private cartels that self regulate those outside of them by the sole discretion of the staff.

Don't like your philosophy?  Ban!  Don't like who you are?  See ya!

Wonderful, governance 2.0.

If you want anyone to take bitcoin seriously, you're going to have to at least respect natural rights of humans as much as the US government.

At least they pretend to have a fair justice system.

If this community cannot respectfully explain why a member who has been active since 2011 was banned for posting articles, why should any member hold trust in this community or pseudo wealthy bitcoin elitists?

What a system that allows an anonymous figure with a large incentive of greed to dictate other equal human being's ability to function with the click of a mouse.

Oroboros

[Buffer Overflow]

Wonderful.  And the cycle continues.  Bitcoin leads to private cartels that self regulate those outside of them by the sole discretion of the staff.

Don't like your philosophy?  Ban!  Don't like who you are?  See ya!

Wonderful, governance 2.0.

If you want anyone to take bitcoin seriously, you're going to have to at least respect natural rights of humans as much as the US government.

At least they pretend to have a fair justice system.

If this community cannot respectfully explain why a member who has been active since 2011 was banned for posting articles, why should any member hold trust in this community or pseudo wealthy bitcoin elitists?

What a system that allows an anonymous figure with a large incentive of greed to dictate other equal human being's ability to function with the click of a mouse.

Oroboros

Bitcoin != Bitcointalk.org

Naturally dank won't see it like this and scream his fake persecution.

Told ya.

What a system that allows an anonymous figure with a large incentive of greed to dictate other equal human being's ability to function with the click of a mouse.

Your not an anonymous figure dank, we know your name and what you look like?  

[dank]

The mind of greed is not confounded to sectors.  It is a pattern, a cycle.

Your not an anonymous figure dank, we know your name and what you look like?

I was referring to the anonymous figure that bans people without debate or reason.

[haploid23]

I'd really like to see a mod commenting on this, because I highly doubt that a user posting an article on a public forum is considered as copyright theft. Can we actually get banned here for quoting an article?

The real reason why dank was banned was because these articles he posted was not entertaining enough. At least all his other threads had high entertainment value. Isn't that obvious? Outside of entertainment, dank is pretty worthless.

[dank]

Love never was worth much money.  It's always been invaluable to me.

[kuusj98]

I was banned for 10 days for 'trolling/spamming' for posting the following articles in politics and society:

http://themindunleashed.org/2013/12/36-foods-help-detox-cleanse-entire-body.html
http://earthweareone.com/stanford-scientists-observe-man-travel-out-of-his-body-and-into-space-what-he-saw-was-remarkable/
http://earthweareone.com/new-study-shows-cannabis-does-not-lower-iq-but-drinking-alcohol-does/
http://wakeup-world.com/2012/10/05/eight-ingredients-you-never-want-to-see-on-your-nutrition-label

I think these are the links I posted.

I would like to know why I was banned for presenting informative articles with a link to the source in each one.

At this point it seems to be a form of censorship, directly or not.

I would like to continue posting these articles.  If you feel that they're in the wrong category, you're welcome to move them to a more appropriating category.  I do not see freely speaking of validated, sourced articles on a discussion board as a misuse of the community.

I would appreciate a response addressing the concerns provided.

You know why you were banned - copyright theft. (Fitting crime for a thief.)  I reported all of those posts.

You cannot copy and paste an entire article, even if you post a link back to it.

If you want to post your garbage, post one or two paragraphs, and a link back to the original.  Can't guarantee you won't get banned again though, since your posts never contribute anything to the community.  

Why would he not be able to link to it? That seems utter bullshit to me.
If you use material from another site you MUST place it between "these tags" and place the source above or under the copied pieces. Nothing wrong with that.

[mmo2k14]

How to see time of ban account.. i have banned yesterday T.T
"Sorry vpsmmoforall, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
You have been banned by a forum moderator. You may appeal here: banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com ."
this mean i have ban forever?

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

How to see time of ban account.. i have banned yesterday T.T
"Sorry vpsmmoforall, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
You have been banned by a forum moderator. You may appeal here: banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com ."
this mean i have ban forever?

 

For heavens sake. What did you do, moforall?

[BitcoinEXpress]

So, still awaiting a reply from a staff member as to why I was banned for posting informative articles that challenge the way society perceives existence.

It's actually called "low quality spamming"



~BCX~