[iGotScams] BALLS premine scam

[Spoetnik]

I think the title is still VERY misleading and unfair..

And the context of the bag holder kvgear is a critical part off this story too !

I can't say much compared to HYP coin at least what Spots did was far more honest and legit than what they did.
And "premine scam" ?

I don't think anyone cares about this topic because they can see it's not..
And the only people who seem to care are HYP bag holders *jealous now
and guys who have a Hate on for iGotSpots..

And i have always fought with Spots but i would always give him his props if they are due and i think this topic is unfair and pretty much dishonest
If you have some proof of a REAL "premine Scam" then go for it light his ass up and let's see it.
So far i have heard nothing..

[billotronic]

I think the title is still VERY misleading and unfair..

And the context of the bag holder kvgear is a critical part off this story too !

I can't say much compared to HYP coin at least what Spots did was far more honest and legit than what they did.
And "premine scam" ?

I don't think anyone cares about this topic because they can see it's not..
And the only people who seem to care are HYP bag holders *jealous now
and guys who have a Hate on for iGotSpots..

And i have always fought with Spots but i would always give him his props if they are due and i think this topic is unfair and pretty much dishonest
If you have some proof of a REAL "premine Scam" then go for it light his ass up and let's see it.
So far i have heard nothing..

[newuser01]

whatever idiot who decides to buy/mine a coin that goes by "BALLS" deserves to lose everything

[norcalnewbie707]

   Choosing cute sub-handles like Igotscammed and Mudafuda sure don't do allot to hide your intentions.Congrats..you accomplished your goal of trashing an interesting coin, putting myself and others firmly into the red on this one. Now you can move on to whatever else you might feel competes with what you might be into.

I'm a hero member dickhead. Fuck off noob, it's fucktards like you supporting purely shit coins are solely to blame for the current state of crypto. Idiot.

I am very surprised you let that 'Coindexter' person flip your switch enough to where you would even need to respond. You told them, surely they must be thinking twice before they ever try anything like that again.....

[iGotScammed]

https://i.imgur.com/ZPKz4i2.jpg

0.00016 bitcoins to 0.000005 bitcoins. For iGotSpots this normal coin chart of his. Pump up dump down. Do some stupid code that ruin coin and make it so he can move to the next one wiht excuse 

You dumb ballsers dont get it yet?? You deserve it then.

[Spoetnik]

I think the title is still VERY misleading and unfair..

And the context of the bag holder kvgear is a critical part off this story too !

I can't say much compared to HYP coin at least what Spots did was far more honest and legit than what they did.
And "premine scam" ?

I don't think anyone cares about this topic because they can see it's not..
And the only people who seem to care are HYP bag holders *jealous now
and guys who have a Hate on for iGotSpots..

And i have always fought with Spots but i would always give him his props if they are due and i think this topic is unfair and pretty much dishonest
If you have some proof of a REAL "premine Scam" then go for it light his ass up and let's see it.
So far i have heard nothing..

[image removed]

[Spoetnik]

0.00016 bitcoins to 0.000005 bitcoins. For iGotSpots this normal coin chart of his. Pump up dump down. Do some stupid code that ruin coin and make it so he can move to the next one wiht excuse 

You dumb ballsers dont get it yet?? You deserve it then.

the HYP coin chart looks even worse LOLOLOLOL

[muddafudda]

Let's look at spots history of shitcoins.

All coins were privately instamined and have been proven to be so.


Copperbars- Not updated for over 1 year https://github.com/copperbars/copperbars
Lottery Tickets- Not updated for over a year. https://github.com/LotteryTickets/LotteryTickets
Spots- Not updated for over a year.
"insert shady year of failed launches under alt accounts"
Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called- Launched under alt name, tried to reclaim with Igotspots name fail.
Balls.- About to be less than worthless.

You would be pretty fucking stupid to go near this guy and his "work".

[iGotScammed]

Let's look at spots history of shitcoins.

All coins were privately instamined and have been proven to be so.


Copperbars- Not updated for over 1 year https://github.com/copperbars/copperbars
Lottery Tickets- Not updated for over a year. https://github.com/LotteryTickets/LotteryTickets
Spots- Not updated for over a year.
"insert shady year of failed launches under alt accounts"
Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called- Launched under alt name, tried to reclaim with Igotspots name fail.
Balls.- About to be less than worthless.

You would be pretty fucking stupid to go near this guy and his "work".

How many scamshitcoins does iGotSpoetniksPeepies really has made? CANNOT KNOW FOR CERTAIN.

They have used fake SCAM ACCOUNTS You see Maticon was a scam dev name 1st, then igotspoetnikpeepy claimed it.

[M28MmickT]

Let's look at spots history of shitcoins.

All coins were privately instamined and have been proven to be so.


Copperbars- Not updated for over 1 year https://github.com/copperbars/copperbars
Lottery Tickets- Not updated for over a year. https://github.com/LotteryTickets/LotteryTickets
Spots- Not updated for over a year.
"insert shady year of failed launches under alt accounts"
Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called- Launched under alt name, tried to reclaim with Igotspots name fail.
Balls.- About to be less than worthless.

You would be pretty fucking stupid to go near this guy and his "work".

How many scamshitcoins does iGotSpoetniksPeepies really has made? CANNOT KNOW FOR CERTAIN.

They have used fake SCAM ACCOUNTS You see Maticon was a scam dev name 1st, then igotspoetnikpeepy claimed it.

New piggy coin? balls? diem? dash? burst? hyp? Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called?  i could probably go on but we will get the same old the coin changed hands and they have nothing to do with them. the common trait with coins, they are worthless..

[iGotScammed]

New piggy coin? balls? diem? dash? burst? hyp? Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called?  i could probably go on but we will get the same old the coin changed hands and they have nothing to do with them. the common trait with coins, they are worthless..

7 coins that WE KNOW OF, in only few months of time. And ball is 8. 8+ crytpocoins! igotspoets pump team has no shame!

[iGotSpots]

TIX was fair, don't lie; it's a year long whine so I'm over your tears about it. The algorithm is scrypt-jane, though, so it's not comparable at all with varying n's

That's not the only place difficulty adjustments are calculated, mudda...however, you are proving that you can do nothing but change one or two lines and clone a bunch of shit without actually taking the time to understand how everything really works. You are showing your amateur card. You sure you wanna go down this road with me again? I've stepped my personal game up in the last year or so and it looks like you have fallen very far behind now

Man...it really is tough to check the explorer and see it adjusted every block  

In case you are too dense to figure it out, difficulty is the 3.5's. Don't forget this had over 800 Terahash on it for several days. Many blocks were being found per second on very reputable pools. Do I really need to get more unaffiliated, trustworthy forum members and pool ops that were there at launch to come in here and vouch for the coin's fairness?

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=2016&hi=2016

Code:

2016	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.552	80640	0.0334606	92.3891	0%
2015	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.55	80600	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2014	2014-11-01 09:20:16	1	40	3.547	80560	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2013	2014-11-01 09:20:13	1	40	3.545	80520	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2012	2014-11-01 09:20:12	1	40	3.543	80480	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2011	2014-11-01 09:20:11	1	40	3.54	80440	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2010	2014-11-01 09:20:09	1	40	3.538	80400	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2009	2014-11-01 09:20:08	1	40	3.535	80360	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2008	2014-11-01 09:20:06	1	40	3.533	80320	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2007	2014-11-01 09:20:05	1	40	3.531	80280	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2006	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.528	80240	0.0334838	92.3889	0%
2005	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.526	80200	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2004	2014-11-01 09:20:02	1	40	3.523	80160	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2003	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.521	80120	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2002	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.518	80080	0.0335069	92.3889	0%
2001	2014-11-01 09:20:00	1	40	3.516	80040	0.0335185	92.3889	0%
2000	2014-11-01 09:19:59	1	40	3.514	80000	0.0335185	92.3889	0%

Now let's go ahead and look at the first 23 blocks I used to set up the network and avoid an instamine

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=23&hi=23

Code:

23	2014-11-01 07:51:07	1	40	185.359	920	0.16581	92.3272	0%
22	2014-11-01 07:49:13	1	40	185.42	880	0.172025	92.3258	0%
21	2014-11-01 07:47:44	1	40	187.02	840	0.17919	92.3248	0%
20	2014-11-01 07:34:18	1	40	187.742	800	0.178819	92.3155	0%
19	2014-11-01 07:27:44	1	40	187.67	760	0.183669	92.3109	0%
18	2014-11-01 07:27:16	1	40	187.576	720	0.193553	92.3106	0%
17	2014-11-01 07:26:59	1	40	187.643	680	0.204745	92.3104	0%
16	2014-11-01 07:25:28	1	40	188.417	640	0.216481	92.3093	0%
15	2014-11-01 07:18:31	1	40	188.309	600	0.226088	92.3045	0%
14	2014-11-01 07:18:20	1	40	206.46	560	0.242118	92.3044	0%
13	2014-11-01 04:58:28	1	40	232.184	520	0.163611	92.2073	0%
12	2014-11-01 01:57:59	1	40	232.609	480	0.0519097	92.0819	0%
11	2014-11-01 01:54:20	1	40	233.594	440	0.0540972	92.0794	0%
10	2014-11-01 01:47:14	1	40	233.555	400	0.0545718	92.0745	0%
9	2014-11-01 01:46:28	1	40	235.37	360	0.0601042	92.0739	0%
8	2014-11-01 01:34:16	1	40	235.489	320	0.0591435	92.0655	0%
7	2014-11-01 01:32:32	1	40	251.823	280	0.0664005	92.0642	0%
6	2014-10-31 23:51:36	1	40	251.728	240	0.00737269	91.9942	0%
5	2014-10-31 23:51:08	1	40	251.762	200	0.00851852	91.9938	0%
4	2014-10-31 23:49:56	1	40	253.95	160	0.00981481	91.993	0%
3	2014-10-31 23:36:25	1	40	254.188	120	0.0037037	91.9836	0%
2	2014-10-31 23:34:03	1	40	256.003	80	0.00392361	91.982	0%
1	2014-10-31 23:22:45	1	40	256.003	40	0	91.9741	 

So my "solo instamine" was with blocks at significantly higher difficulty to sync initial nodes up and get a few checkpoints in. This is what someone who knows what they are doing to launch a fair coin that won't break does. Just because you aren't used to legitimacy around here doesn't mean those who do it right are in the wrong

Just putting this on the newest page so it doesn't seem like I haven't responded

[iGotScammed]

New piggy coin? balls? diem? dash? burst? hyp? Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called?  i could probably go on but we will get the same old the coin changed hands and they have nothing to do with them. the common trait with coins, they are worthless..

7 coins that WE KNOW OF, in only few months of time. And ball is 8. 8+ crytpocoins! igotspoets pump team has no shame!

Why scammer can't answer to this?

[Zer0Sum]

Let's look at spots history of shitcoins.

All coins were privately instamined and have been proven to be so.


Copperbars- Not updated for over 1 year https://github.com/copperbars/copperbars
Lottery Tickets- Not updated for over a year. https://github.com/LotteryTickets/LotteryTickets
Spots- Not updated for over a year.
"insert shady year of failed launches under alt accounts"
Maticulious or whatever the fuck its called- Launched under alt name, tried to reclaim with Igotspots name fail.
Balls.- About to be less than worthless.

You would be pretty fucking stupid to go near this guy and his "work".

When BALLS were launched Dev repeated something over and over 1,000 times.

Buy the BALLS and "just stake them". Just f*cking stake them.

Every single person that followed that advice made money... I made money, lots of people made money.

But there was a time to sell...
And I'm out because I ONLY trade coins with "coin control"...
Maybe I'll look at M and BALLS again when they have quality "coin control" information.

[muddafudda]

TIX was fair, don't lie; it's a year long whine so I'm over your tears about it. The algorithm is scrypt-jane, though, so it's not comparable at all with varying n's

That's not the only place difficulty adjustments are calculated, mudda...however, you are proving that you can do nothing but change one or two lines and clone a bunch of shit without actually taking the time to understand how everything really works. You are showing your amateur card. You sure you wanna go down this road with me again? I've stepped my personal game up in the last year or so and it looks like you have fallen very far behind now

Man...it really is tough to check the explorer and see it adjusted every block  

In case you are too dense to figure it out, difficulty is the 3.5's. Don't forget this had over 800 Terahash on it for several days. Many blocks were being found per second on very reputable pools. Do I really need to get more unaffiliated, trustworthy forum members and pool ops that were there at launch to come in here and vouch for the coin's fairness?

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=2016&hi=2016

Code:

2016	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.552	80640	0.0334606	92.3891	0%
2015	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.55	80600	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2014	2014-11-01 09:20:16	1	40	3.547	80560	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2013	2014-11-01 09:20:13	1	40	3.545	80520	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2012	2014-11-01 09:20:12	1	40	3.543	80480	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2011	2014-11-01 09:20:11	1	40	3.54	80440	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2010	2014-11-01 09:20:09	1	40	3.538	80400	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2009	2014-11-01 09:20:08	1	40	3.535	80360	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2008	2014-11-01 09:20:06	1	40	3.533	80320	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2007	2014-11-01 09:20:05	1	40	3.531	80280	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2006	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.528	80240	0.0334838	92.3889	0%
2005	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.526	80200	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2004	2014-11-01 09:20:02	1	40	3.523	80160	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2003	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.521	80120	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2002	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.518	80080	0.0335069	92.3889	0%
2001	2014-11-01 09:20:00	1	40	3.516	80040	0.0335185	92.3889	0%
2000	2014-11-01 09:19:59	1	40	3.514	80000	0.0335185	92.3889	0%

Now let's go ahead and look at the first 23 blocks I used to set up the network and avoid an instamine

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=23&hi=23

Code:

23	2014-11-01 07:51:07	1	40	185.359	920	0.16581	92.3272	0%
22	2014-11-01 07:49:13	1	40	185.42	880	0.172025	92.3258	0%
21	2014-11-01 07:47:44	1	40	187.02	840	0.17919	92.3248	0%
20	2014-11-01 07:34:18	1	40	187.742	800	0.178819	92.3155	0%
19	2014-11-01 07:27:44	1	40	187.67	760	0.183669	92.3109	0%
18	2014-11-01 07:27:16	1	40	187.576	720	0.193553	92.3106	0%
17	2014-11-01 07:26:59	1	40	187.643	680	0.204745	92.3104	0%
16	2014-11-01 07:25:28	1	40	188.417	640	0.216481	92.3093	0%
15	2014-11-01 07:18:31	1	40	188.309	600	0.226088	92.3045	0%
14	2014-11-01 07:18:20	1	40	206.46	560	0.242118	92.3044	0%
13	2014-11-01 04:58:28	1	40	232.184	520	0.163611	92.2073	0%
12	2014-11-01 01:57:59	1	40	232.609	480	0.0519097	92.0819	0%
11	2014-11-01 01:54:20	1	40	233.594	440	0.0540972	92.0794	0%
10	2014-11-01 01:47:14	1	40	233.555	400	0.0545718	92.0745	0%
9	2014-11-01 01:46:28	1	40	235.37	360	0.0601042	92.0739	0%
8	2014-11-01 01:34:16	1	40	235.489	320	0.0591435	92.0655	0%
7	2014-11-01 01:32:32	1	40	251.823	280	0.0664005	92.0642	0%
6	2014-10-31 23:51:36	1	40	251.728	240	0.00737269	91.9942	0%
5	2014-10-31 23:51:08	1	40	251.762	200	0.00851852	91.9938	0%
4	2014-10-31 23:49:56	1	40	253.95	160	0.00981481	91.993	0%
3	2014-10-31 23:36:25	1	40	254.188	120	0.0037037	91.9836	0%
2	2014-10-31 23:34:03	1	40	256.003	80	0.00392361	91.982	0%
1	2014-10-31 23:22:45	1	40	256.003	40	0	91.9741	 

So my "solo instamine" was with blocks at significantly higher difficulty to sync initial nodes up and get a few checkpoints in. This is what someone who knows what they are doing to launch a fair coin that won't break does. Just because you aren't used to legitimacy around here doesn't mean those who do it right are in the wrong

Just putting this on the newest page so it doesn't seem like I haven't responded

Thankyou for once again proving your lack of knowledge.

Instamine can be fixed, post launch to start with a higher diff. There is zero need to checkpoint a fair launch coin prior to launch.

Once again instead of a fair launch without any blocks is very easy and well within your knowledge base and skill set. The fact you checkpointed the chain is a 100% clear indication that you didn't want your instamined blocks lost to a bigger and longer chain. There is no other justification other than to secure your instamine.


Argue and post all the bullshit you want but checkpointing on a fair launch is not two words you can use together. Fair launch would go to the longest chain, not your instamined checkpointed chain.

[iGotSpots]

TIX was fair, don't lie; it's a year long whine so I'm over your tears about it. The algorithm is scrypt-jane, though, so it's not comparable at all with varying n's

That's not the only place difficulty adjustments are calculated, mudda...however, you are proving that you can do nothing but change one or two lines and clone a bunch of shit without actually taking the time to understand how everything really works. You are showing your amateur card. You sure you wanna go down this road with me again? I've stepped my personal game up in the last year or so and it looks like you have fallen very far behind now

Man...it really is tough to check the explorer and see it adjusted every block  

In case you are too dense to figure it out, difficulty is the 3.5's. Don't forget this had over 800 Terahash on it for several days. Many blocks were being found per second on very reputable pools. Do I really need to get more unaffiliated, trustworthy forum members and pool ops that were there at launch to come in here and vouch for the coin's fairness?

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=2016&hi=2016

Code:

2016	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.552	80640	0.0334606	92.3891	0%
2015	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.55	80600	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2014	2014-11-01 09:20:16	1	40	3.547	80560	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2013	2014-11-01 09:20:13	1	40	3.545	80520	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2012	2014-11-01 09:20:12	1	40	3.543	80480	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2011	2014-11-01 09:20:11	1	40	3.54	80440	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2010	2014-11-01 09:20:09	1	40	3.538	80400	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2009	2014-11-01 09:20:08	1	40	3.535	80360	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2008	2014-11-01 09:20:06	1	40	3.533	80320	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2007	2014-11-01 09:20:05	1	40	3.531	80280	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2006	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.528	80240	0.0334838	92.3889	0%
2005	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.526	80200	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2004	2014-11-01 09:20:02	1	40	3.523	80160	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2003	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.521	80120	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2002	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.518	80080	0.0335069	92.3889	0%
2001	2014-11-01 09:20:00	1	40	3.516	80040	0.0335185	92.3889	0%
2000	2014-11-01 09:19:59	1	40	3.514	80000	0.0335185	92.3889	0%

Now let's go ahead and look at the first 23 blocks I used to set up the network and avoid an instamine

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=23&hi=23

Code:

23	2014-11-01 07:51:07	1	40	185.359	920	0.16581	92.3272	0%
22	2014-11-01 07:49:13	1	40	185.42	880	0.172025	92.3258	0%
21	2014-11-01 07:47:44	1	40	187.02	840	0.17919	92.3248	0%
20	2014-11-01 07:34:18	1	40	187.742	800	0.178819	92.3155	0%
19	2014-11-01 07:27:44	1	40	187.67	760	0.183669	92.3109	0%
18	2014-11-01 07:27:16	1	40	187.576	720	0.193553	92.3106	0%
17	2014-11-01 07:26:59	1	40	187.643	680	0.204745	92.3104	0%
16	2014-11-01 07:25:28	1	40	188.417	640	0.216481	92.3093	0%
15	2014-11-01 07:18:31	1	40	188.309	600	0.226088	92.3045	0%
14	2014-11-01 07:18:20	1	40	206.46	560	0.242118	92.3044	0%
13	2014-11-01 04:58:28	1	40	232.184	520	0.163611	92.2073	0%
12	2014-11-01 01:57:59	1	40	232.609	480	0.0519097	92.0819	0%
11	2014-11-01 01:54:20	1	40	233.594	440	0.0540972	92.0794	0%
10	2014-11-01 01:47:14	1	40	233.555	400	0.0545718	92.0745	0%
9	2014-11-01 01:46:28	1	40	235.37	360	0.0601042	92.0739	0%
8	2014-11-01 01:34:16	1	40	235.489	320	0.0591435	92.0655	0%
7	2014-11-01 01:32:32	1	40	251.823	280	0.0664005	92.0642	0%
6	2014-10-31 23:51:36	1	40	251.728	240	0.00737269	91.9942	0%
5	2014-10-31 23:51:08	1	40	251.762	200	0.00851852	91.9938	0%
4	2014-10-31 23:49:56	1	40	253.95	160	0.00981481	91.993	0%
3	2014-10-31 23:36:25	1	40	254.188	120	0.0037037	91.9836	0%
2	2014-10-31 23:34:03	1	40	256.003	80	0.00392361	91.982	0%
1	2014-10-31 23:22:45	1	40	256.003	40	0	91.9741	 

So my "solo instamine" was with blocks at significantly higher difficulty to sync initial nodes up and get a few checkpoints in. This is what someone who knows what they are doing to launch a fair coin that won't break does. Just because you aren't used to legitimacy around here doesn't mean those who do it right are in the wrong

Just putting this on the newest page so it doesn't seem like I haven't responded

Thankyou for once again proving your lack of knowledge.

Instamine can be fixed, post launch to start with a higher diff. There is zero need to checkpoint a fair launch coin prior to launch.

Once again instead of a fair launch without any blocks is very easy and well within your knowledge base and skill set. The fact you checkpointed the chain is a 100% clear indication that you didn't want your instamined blocks lost to a bigger and longer chain. There is no other justification other than to secure your instamine.


Argue and post all the bullshit you want but checkpointing on a fair launch is not two words you can use together. Fair launch would go to the longest chain, not your instamined checkpointed chain.

Is that why your coins fork on accident and none of mine have forked, broken, or folded to an attack?

There was over 800 Terahash mining BALLS with several blocks per second and no forks. I launched it perfectly

[bitboy11]

Just another one of the 1,000 new coins per year...keep 'em coming.

[muddafudda]

TIX was fair, don't lie; it's a year long whine so I'm over your tears about it. The algorithm is scrypt-jane, though, so it's not comparable at all with varying n's

That's not the only place difficulty adjustments are calculated, mudda...however, you are proving that you can do nothing but change one or two lines and clone a bunch of shit without actually taking the time to understand how everything really works. You are showing your amateur card. You sure you wanna go down this road with me again? I've stepped my personal game up in the last year or so and it looks like you have fallen very far behind now

Man...it really is tough to check the explorer and see it adjusted every block  

In case you are too dense to figure it out, difficulty is the 3.5's. Don't forget this had over 800 Terahash on it for several days. Many blocks were being found per second on very reputable pools. Do I really need to get more unaffiliated, trustworthy forum members and pool ops that were there at launch to come in here and vouch for the coin's fairness?

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=2016&hi=2016

Code:

2016	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.552	80640	0.0334606	92.3891	0%
2015	2014-11-01 09:20:17	1	40	3.55	80600	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2014	2014-11-01 09:20:16	1	40	3.547	80560	0.0334838	92.3891	0%
2013	2014-11-01 09:20:13	1	40	3.545	80520	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2012	2014-11-01 09:20:12	1	40	3.543	80480	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2011	2014-11-01 09:20:11	1	40	3.54	80440	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2010	2014-11-01 09:20:09	1	40	3.538	80400	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2009	2014-11-01 09:20:08	1	40	3.535	80360	0.0334722	92.389	0%
2008	2014-11-01 09:20:06	1	40	3.533	80320	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2007	2014-11-01 09:20:05	1	40	3.531	80280	0.0334722	92.3889	0%
2006	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.528	80240	0.0334838	92.3889	0%
2005	2014-11-01 09:20:04	1	40	3.526	80200	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2004	2014-11-01 09:20:02	1	40	3.523	80160	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2003	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.521	80120	0.0334954	92.3889	0%
2002	2014-11-01 09:20:01	1	40	3.518	80080	0.0335069	92.3889	0%
2001	2014-11-01 09:20:00	1	40	3.516	80040	0.0335185	92.3889	0%
2000	2014-11-01 09:19:59	1	40	3.514	80000	0.0335185	92.3889	0%

Now let's go ahead and look at the first 23 blocks I used to set up the network and avoid an instamine

Source: http://balls.blockexplorer.cc/chain/Snowballs?count=23&hi=23

Code:

23	2014-11-01 07:51:07	1	40	185.359	920	0.16581	92.3272	0%
22	2014-11-01 07:49:13	1	40	185.42	880	0.172025	92.3258	0%
21	2014-11-01 07:47:44	1	40	187.02	840	0.17919	92.3248	0%
20	2014-11-01 07:34:18	1	40	187.742	800	0.178819	92.3155	0%
19	2014-11-01 07:27:44	1	40	187.67	760	0.183669	92.3109	0%
18	2014-11-01 07:27:16	1	40	187.576	720	0.193553	92.3106	0%
17	2014-11-01 07:26:59	1	40	187.643	680	0.204745	92.3104	0%
16	2014-11-01 07:25:28	1	40	188.417	640	0.216481	92.3093	0%
15	2014-11-01 07:18:31	1	40	188.309	600	0.226088	92.3045	0%
14	2014-11-01 07:18:20	1	40	206.46	560	0.242118	92.3044	0%
13	2014-11-01 04:58:28	1	40	232.184	520	0.163611	92.2073	0%
12	2014-11-01 01:57:59	1	40	232.609	480	0.0519097	92.0819	0%
11	2014-11-01 01:54:20	1	40	233.594	440	0.0540972	92.0794	0%
10	2014-11-01 01:47:14	1	40	233.555	400	0.0545718	92.0745	0%
9	2014-11-01 01:46:28	1	40	235.37	360	0.0601042	92.0739	0%
8	2014-11-01 01:34:16	1	40	235.489	320	0.0591435	92.0655	0%
7	2014-11-01 01:32:32	1	40	251.823	280	0.0664005	92.0642	0%
6	2014-10-31 23:51:36	1	40	251.728	240	0.00737269	91.9942	0%
5	2014-10-31 23:51:08	1	40	251.762	200	0.00851852	91.9938	0%
4	2014-10-31 23:49:56	1	40	253.95	160	0.00981481	91.993	0%
3	2014-10-31 23:36:25	1	40	254.188	120	0.0037037	91.9836	0%
2	2014-10-31 23:34:03	1	40	256.003	80	0.00392361	91.982	0%
1	2014-10-31 23:22:45	1	40	256.003	40	0	91.9741	 

So my "solo instamine" was with blocks at significantly higher difficulty to sync initial nodes up and get a few checkpoints in. This is what someone who knows what they are doing to launch a fair coin that won't break does. Just because you aren't used to legitimacy around here doesn't mean those who do it right are in the wrong

Just putting this on the newest page so it doesn't seem like I haven't responded

Thankyou for once again proving your lack of knowledge.

Instamine can be fixed, post launch to start with a higher diff. There is zero need to checkpoint a fair launch coin prior to launch.

Once again instead of a fair launch without any blocks is very easy and well within your knowledge base and skill set. The fact you checkpointed the chain is a 100% clear indication that you didn't want your instamined blocks lost to a bigger and longer chain. There is no other justification other than to secure your instamine.


Argue and post all the bullshit you want but checkpointing on a fair launch is not two words you can use together. Fair launch would go to the longest chain, not your instamined checkpointed chain.

Is that why your coins fork on accident and none of mine have forked, broken, or folded to an attack?

There was over 800 Terahash mining BALLS with several blocks per second and no forks. I launched it perfectly

Thankyou for admitting your a shit cunt. Job done.

In fact why don't you take your gutless little self back to one of your soft cock self moderated threads

[iGotScammed]

Is that why your coins fork on accident and none of mine have forked, broken, or folded to an attack?

More Lie from scamguy... fork not long ago, and admits to his own faults

Maieuticoin 1.0.3
Many changes in this client; too many, in fact, to list in separate lines. We basically took another coin, adapted everything into Maieuticoin, then did some GUI upgrades of our own. You will require reindexing the first time you open this client. This will automatically begin when it is run for the first time. Do not be alarmed. Your balance will change during reindexing, and may start at 0. It will return to where it is supposed to be by the time the reindexing has completed. Reindexing could be slow, but it is worth it to ensure that all blocks are valid

• Coin control has been added
• Graph added to QT Interface
• Many performance enhancements
• Smoother transition through old blocks
• Network data handled more efficiently

http://mmxivcoin.com/images/windows.png   http://mmxivcoin.com/images/github.png

since updating to 1.03 getting 90% orphans from my stake 

Everytime when I want to update blockchain wallet says

"Assertion failed"
kernel error
blah blah.

Solutions......

   I'm seeing 5-6 orphans per valid stake also (since upgrading).

Looks like M-coin trading is disabled on Bittrex.

Sorry about this. I updated the checkpoint server to the newest version, which has since been reverted back to 1.0.2, the same version exchanges, multipool, and the Snowball are running on for a more lightweight client. The fault is completely mine. Thankfully it does not affect balances or anything like that

[iGotSpots]

Is that why your coins fork on accident and none of mine have forked, broken, or folded to an attack?

More Lie from scamguy... fork not long ago, and admits to his own faults

Maieuticoin 1.0.3
Many changes in this client; too many, in fact, to list in separate lines. We basically took another coin, adapted everything into Maieuticoin, then did some GUI upgrades of our own. You will require reindexing the first time you open this client. This will automatically begin when it is run for the first time. Do not be alarmed. Your balance will change during reindexing, and may start at 0. It will return to where it is supposed to be by the time the reindexing has completed. Reindexing could be slow, but it is worth it to ensure that all blocks are valid

• Coin control has been added
• Graph added to QT Interface
• Many performance enhancements
• Smoother transition through old blocks
• Network data handled more efficiently

 

since updating to 1.03 getting 90% orphans from my stake  

Everytime when I want to update blockchain wallet says

"Assertion failed"
kernel error
blah blah.

Solutions......

  I'm seeing 5-6 orphans per valid stake also (since upgrading).

Looks like M-coin trading is disabled on Bittrex.

Sorry about this. I updated the checkpoint server to the newest version, which has since been reverted back to 1.0.2, the same version exchanges, multipool, and the Snowball are running on for a more lightweight client. The fault is completely mine. Thankfully it does not affect balances or anything like that

Wasn't a fork; it was a bad checkpoint from a shitty version of coin control, which was fixed within an hour. Coin wasn't broken at all, just halted trading as a warning. Coin worked just fine through a bad checkpoint, just triggered exchange flags. Nice example, though. Incoming personal insults in 3, 2, 1.........