[BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign

[Gianluca95]

Beautiful signature campaign. It remember me the old signature campaign of PrimeDice. But, is it possible to reserve a spot for me? Tomorrow I'll leave my signature and I'll be able to put yours. Please, can you let me know if is possible?

[BigBoy89]

I'd like to join your signature campaign
please consider to accept me
BigBoy89
Sr. Member
Post Count: 810
Bit-X Address : 35rYSPQeF4xBqNMHuik1owaGuKYoCpVmUW

Thanks

[marcotheminer]

Going through everything now!

[mailmansDOGE]

What ? Where did u get this figure ? This is insane...

Dunno. I think it is a typo. Go to Bit-x.com and scrolldown. yesterday, it showed only a few satoshis.

and maybe it was done by inspect element to make fun of the site.

[irfan_pak10]

Joined you

Name:   irfan_pak10
Posts:   364
Activity:   168
Position:   Full Member
Bitcoin address:    3BzDS6Xrgb7UG6ay6SMQLUNhQW4tF3b2DJ

[marcotheminer]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

[BitCoinDream]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

[Malin Keshar]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

As long we don't see people spamming low contend topics only to get their quota.

[marcotheminer]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

This will give them a lot of exposure. Please update it in the OP.

As long we don't see people spamming low contend topics only to get their quota.

That will fall under spam and they won't be counted.

Remember: Make high quality topics, not only in the bitcoin discussion board, everywhere!

[Nobitcoin]

Name:   Nobitcoin
Posts:   1316
Activity:   308
Position:   Senior Member
Bitcoin address:  1NYaBPmrUjGZ5WA7iiPkDGcd7EBZKNTECW
Bit-X : 33PAco5cQHcNK6G4rFbggKLz9R9WUftXPB

Count me out just read your rules this campaign is no fun sorry I think I'll wait for another.

[hilariousandco]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

[botany]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

Enforcing this should be pretty simple.
You have a stat panel for each person's profile.
You can pull out details - including post count and number of topics started. A simple script can do this.
Run this script at the start and end of the term - voila, you have the number of topics started.

In my personal opinion, this rule will lead to more irritating spam. If spammy posts are buried deep inside, you can ignore them. If there are spammy topics, they will be more irritating.

[marcotheminer]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

It would be enforceable, without too much hassle.

This rule has been removed however. The following have been added.

Rule updates:
Minimum of 5+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 5+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Personal Message text must not advertise another site (it can be something personal, not a site)

Effective immediately.

[Quickseller]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

[botany]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

I tend to agree with you there. Weeding out spammers should be done while selecting participants. An effective tactic would be denying people with low quality posts the chance to participate in subsequent campaigns. They are less likely to make noise if they are paid, but are not allowed to participate in the next term.

[jw_industry]

I will like to join

[ikydesu]

Rule updates:
Minimum of 10+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 10+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Must post minimum 10 post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help? or select between?

[Brewins]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

You can edit the title of the reply you get. You can even take off the re thing, like I did, and make looks like you created the topic, by your logic.


By the way, when will the campaign start?

[marcotheminer]

By the way, when will the campaign starts?

It has already started!

[detector]

Too many rule! Too many restrictions
At the end, all campaigner will get upset if they did not paid,
And this signature campaign is very not effective

Anyway

Good luck for who has joined and remember those restrict rule