Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 11:22:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lower memory clock does not improve mining speed  (Read 5171 times)
chungenhung (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 04:38:39 PM
 #1

So many people say lower memory clock speed up mining speed.
I am using Win7 x64 with 11.4 drivers and the default SDK (I am guessing it is 2.4. How to check it to make sure?).
Running Phoenix 1.47 and poclbm kernel.

With sapphire 5850, core at 840, I lowered the memory clock from 1000 to 300.
What I saw was a 3-6MH/s DROP in hashing rate. This is opposite of what everyone else is getting.

Just to make sure, how do you guys measure the hash rate?
I just look at the command line outputs, where it updates the hashrate every second or so.
1715253757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715253757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715253757
Reply with quote  #2

1715253757
Report to moderator
1715253757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715253757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715253757
Reply with quote  #2

1715253757
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 05:00:27 PM
 #2

Try using an older driver and SDK (2.1 ideally).

dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
May 18, 2011, 05:30:59 PM
 #3

Try this, it may help.
mem clk = Core clk /3 + 14
in your case, (840/3) + 14 = 294
Tyran
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 05:43:59 PM
 #4

Also try different worksizes, I found the optimal setting can vary depending on memory clock speed.
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 05:44:37 PM
 #5

try inthe 200 range... it seems to depend on the card, so there is no set formula

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
chungenhung (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 06:32:46 PM
 #6

Actually I did try various memory clock speeds.
Here is the list:
1200, 1100, 1000, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300.
All have almost zero effect on hash rate.
I cannot go under 300, as it will freezes Windows.
BitLex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 505


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 06:42:45 PM
 #7

i never experienced any improvement in mining speed when lowering memory-clocks,
the reason i do it anyway is simply, that it
a) needs less power and
b) creates less heat
there's no reason not to lower memory-clocks.

fasti
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 09:32:17 PM
 #8

Might not improve mining speed, but it lowers 6950 temperatures by 4c with almost no impact on Hash/s. Can overclock core some more after that = profit.

1QCcAR3e3wdxr7CcJ8ND1NmWuvLttCJScH
m4rkiz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 170
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 09:48:57 PM
 #9

Actually I did try various memory clock speeds.
Here is the list:
1200, 1100, 1000, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300.
All have almost zero effect on hash rate.
I cannot go under 300, as it will freezes Windows.

most people that reports increase claim that sweetspot is only couple mhz wide, so your experience tells us nothing really
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 11:32:28 PM
 #10

My sweetspot for my 6870 1020 core is 344 mem.... it gives me 10Mh/s increase and a 10C decrease.... it is quite awesme

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
Jaime Frontero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 11:48:25 PM
 #11

This may mark me as a total newbie but...
How are people setting their memory clocks? CCC won't let me set mine lower than 450MHz. Running dual 4870's.

what operating system?
jedi95
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 120


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 11:48:45 PM
 #12

So many people say lower memory clock speed up mining speed.
I am using Win7 x64 with 11.4 drivers and the default SDK (I am guessing it is 2.4. How to check it to make sure?).
Running Phoenix 1.47 and poclbm kernel.

With sapphire 5850, core at 840, I lowered the memory clock from 1000 to 300.
What I saw was a 3-6MH/s DROP in hashing rate. This is opposite of what everyone else is getting.

Just to make sure, how do you guys measure the hash rate?
I just look at the command line outputs, where it updates the hashrate every second or so.

With SDK 2.4 you should also try the phatk kernel. (thread is linked in the first post of the Phoenix miner thread, and it's included in 1.48)

Phoenix Miner developer

Donations appreciated at:
1PHoenix9j9J3M6v3VQYWeXrHPPjf7y3rU
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 18, 2011, 11:54:38 PM
 #13

This may mark me as a total newbie but...
How are people setting their memory clocks? CCC won't let me set mine lower than 450MHz. Running dual 4870's.

what operating system?

Win7 x64.

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4292.0

I'm the one who made underclockng popular lol....

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!