Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:56:03 AM |
|
It seems to me if GPU or FPGA will be useless mining bitcoin that they might look at mining on alt chains provided there is some return rather than selling the cards. Can you mine alt coins with an ASIC ? It seems if theres a change in the algo they are useless ?
|
|
|
|
grimd34th
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
June 17, 2012, 01:13:48 AM |
|
It seems to me if GPU or FPGA will be useless mining bitcoin that they might look at mining on alt chains provided there is some return rather than selling the cards. Can you mine alt coins with an ASIC ? It seems if theres a change in the algo they are useless ?
but namecoin isnt a change in algo last time i checked, it was just a seperate chain
|
|
|
|
nedbert9
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Inactive
|
|
June 17, 2012, 01:36:01 AM |
|
It seems to me if GPU or FPGA will be useless mining bitcoin that they might look at mining on alt chains provided there is some return rather than selling the cards. Can you mine alt coins with an ASIC ? It seems if theres a change in the algo they are useless ?
but namecoin isnt a change in algo last time i checked, it was just a seperate chain Interesting. Seems if a minority do merged mining then using ASICs for namecoin could have very interesting returns.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:52:59 PM |
|
Can you even merge mine using ASIC's ?
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4522
Merit: 4125
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
June 17, 2012, 06:49:00 PM |
|
Can you even merge mine using ASIC's ?
sure. the merged mining part is done on the pool side. just point your gpu/fpga/asic/quantumwhammomatic/whatever at a merged mining pool, it does the rest.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2012, 08:34:03 AM |
|
Can you even merge mine using ASIC's ?
sure. the merged mining part is done on the pool side. just point your gpu/fpga/asic/quantumwhammomatic/whatever at a merged mining pool, it does the rest. What do ASIC mine scrypt like ?
|
|
|
|
caston
|
|
June 19, 2012, 01:18:25 PM |
|
I have been buying up LTC on the speculation that GPU rigs will start mining litecoin once ASICs increase the difficulty of BTC.
|
bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK
-updated 3rd December 2017
|
|
|
bulanula
|
|
June 19, 2012, 02:02:00 PM |
|
I have been buying up LTC on the speculation that GPU rigs will start mining litecoin once ASICs increase the difficulty of BTC.
HOLY MOLY ! I think you might be onto something here mate !!! Thanks for the tip !
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 19, 2012, 02:04:45 PM |
|
I have been buying up LTC on the speculation that GPU rigs will start mining litecoin once ASICs increase the difficulty of BTC.
Great minds think alike
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2012, 02:13:28 AM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1474
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
|
June 20, 2012, 02:23:43 AM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
+1 Agreed. I think you will see a rise in price for litecoins over the next 12 months.
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
Wnd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2012, 09:29:20 AM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
+1 Agreed. I think you will see a rise in price for litecoins over the next 12 months. You won't see 1 cent increase unless they make Silkroad for litecoin.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2012, 09:34:00 AM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
+1 Agreed. I think you will see a rise in price for litecoins over the next 12 months. You won't see 1 cent increase unless they make Silkroad for litecoin. Now theres an idea....
|
|
|
|
tatsuchan
|
|
June 21, 2012, 02:02:27 PM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
+1 Agreed. I think you will see a rise in price for litecoins over the next 12 months. You won't see 1 cent increase unless they make Silkroad for litecoin. Now theres an idea.... Make something better. How about Litecoin amateur dentist/surgeon. Get your titties lifted and your final lady-boy transformation done without all those pesky rules. Maybe sell some organs too. How much is a kidney worth in Litecoins?
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 21, 2012, 09:51:12 PM |
|
The adoption of ASIC by bitcoin miners will push GPU and fpga miners somewhere else. My thinking is it will be litecoin because namecoin is merge mined.
Protip: Buy/Mine all the litecoins you can before October.
+1 Agreed. I think you will see a rise in price for litecoins over the next 12 months. You won't see 1 cent increase unless they make Silkroad for litecoin. Now theres an idea.... Make something better. How about Litecoin amateur dentist/surgeon. Get your titties lifted and your final lady-boy transformation done without all those pesky rules. Maybe sell some organs too. How much is a kidney worth in Litecoins? They are about 40 grand in USD so "a lot of ltc"
|
|
|
|
enmaku
|
|
June 21, 2012, 10:01:34 PM |
|
I can't speak for adoption rates but I can speak to whether ASICs can be used on alternate chains.
Any ASIC built to mine on the Bitcoin network can also mine any altcoin for which the algorithm(s) have not been changed. Since Namecoin uses the same algorithms as Bitcoin, Bitcoin ASICs should be able to mine Namecoins - the vast majority of the altcoins didn't change algorithms, actually, so the same is true for them. There are a handful of altcoins, Litecoin and Tenebrix included, which moved to scrypt() as a replacement of sha256() for one step in the process. ASICs won't work for scrypt-based altcoins, nor is it likely that ASICs can or will be built for them: the entire point of scrypt and bcrypt was to make a difficult-to-accelerate algorithm, and by design the amount of die space an scrypt ASIC would take makes it prohibitively expensive even beyond normal ASIC manufacturing costs.
|
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
June 22, 2012, 12:45:20 AM |
|
I can't speak for adoption rates but I can speak to whether ASICs can be used on alternate chains.
Any ASIC built to mine on the Bitcoin network can also mine any altcoin for which the algorithm(s) have not been changed. Since Namecoin uses the same algorithms as Bitcoin, Bitcoin ASICs should be able to mine Namecoins - the vast majority of the altcoins didn't change algorithms, actually, so the same is true for them. There are a handful of altcoins, Litecoin and Tenebrix included, which moved to scrypt() as a replacement of sha256() for one step in the process. ASICs won't work for scrypt-based altcoins, nor is it likely that ASICs can or will be built for them: the entire point of scrypt and bcrypt was to make a difficult-to-accelerate algorithm, and by design the amount of die space an scrypt ASIC would take makes it prohibitively expensive even beyond normal ASIC manufacturing costs.
Great input. But would it be possible to use FPGA's for Litecoins? Can it be configured or modified for Litecoins? Its very hard to believe that CPU's and GPU's are going to be the best for scrypt-based hashing.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
|
|
June 22, 2012, 01:26:35 AM |
|
I can't speak for adoption rates but I can speak to whether ASICs can be used on alternate chains.
Any ASIC built to mine on the Bitcoin network can also mine any altcoin for which the algorithm(s) have not been changed. Since Namecoin uses the same algorithms as Bitcoin, Bitcoin ASICs should be able to mine Namecoins - the vast majority of the altcoins didn't change algorithms, actually, so the same is true for them. There are a handful of altcoins, Litecoin and Tenebrix included, which moved to scrypt() as a replacement of sha256() for one step in the process. ASICs won't work for scrypt-based altcoins, nor is it likely that ASICs can or will be built for them: the entire point of scrypt and bcrypt was to make a difficult-to-accelerate algorithm, and by design the amount of die space an scrypt ASIC would take makes it prohibitively expensive even beyond normal ASIC manufacturing costs.
Great input. But would it be possible to use FPGA's for Litecoins? Can it be configured or modified for Litecoins? Its very hard to believe that CPU's and GPU's are going to be the best for scrypt-based hashing. I imagine so as they are programmeable. Has anyone tried to use them for litecoin yet ?
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 22, 2012, 03:26:14 AM |
|
Scrypt is easily mined by anything with high integer processing power and high memory bandwidth... The latter is most often lacked by fpga devices like we see used to mine bitcoin. As high memory bandwidth is very important to gpus for 3d applications, gpus will probably remain better than anything else for hashing Scrypt in the next long while. For instance, the spartan 6 fpgas have memory bandwidth amounts an order of magnitude smaller than current generation amd gpus.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
enmaku
|
|
June 23, 2012, 04:54:49 PM |
|
I can't speak for adoption rates but I can speak to whether ASICs can be used on alternate chains.
Any ASIC built to mine on the Bitcoin network can also mine any altcoin for which the algorithm(s) have not been changed. Since Namecoin uses the same algorithms as Bitcoin, Bitcoin ASICs should be able to mine Namecoins - the vast majority of the altcoins didn't change algorithms, actually, so the same is true for them. There are a handful of altcoins, Litecoin and Tenebrix included, which moved to scrypt() as a replacement of sha256() for one step in the process. ASICs won't work for scrypt-based altcoins, nor is it likely that ASICs can or will be built for them: the entire point of scrypt and bcrypt was to make a difficult-to-accelerate algorithm, and by design the amount of die space an scrypt ASIC would take makes it prohibitively expensive even beyond normal ASIC manufacturing costs.
Great input. But would it be possible to use FPGA's for Litecoins? Can it be configured or modified for Litecoins? Its very hard to believe that CPU's and GPU's are going to be the best for scrypt-based hashing. FPGAs are essentially programmable ASICs, the only meaningful difference is size and price point. FPGAs tend to be larger than ASICs and cost much more per chip. ASICs tend to be smaller and cheaper than FPGAs but you can't purchase just one, minimum order size tends to be massive because the manufacturing process has huge initial costs - once those initial costs are outlaid, however, they become quite cheap to re-manufacture new batches of. The only reason ASICs are just starting to hit the Bitcoin market is because it's taken this long for someone to amass and be willing to front that initial cost. In short, if you can do it with an ASIC you can probably do it with an FPGA (some slight limitations/differences, but none that important). Scrypt, and therefore Litecoin, is highly resistant to GPU, FPGA and ASIC acceleration because of its high memory requirements. See this StackExchange question for more details: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/1305/22
|
|
|
|
|