|
wr104 (OP)
|
 |
June 29, 2015, 01:49:26 PM |
|
I've setup a new 64-bit wallet on a new machine, is there a way to transfer my funds from my old 32 bit machine to the new one without transfer cost ?
I have a lot of small transactions in my 32bit wallet and it takes a long time to start up, would that be better in a 64 bit wallet with only a couple of transactions ?
If you just want to transfer the wallet, it can be done easily with the backup/restore wallet options. But, if you want to consolidate small transactions into a couple of addresses, you need to use the network and pay the 0.2% fee. |
|
|
|
|
|
happyaltminer
|
|
June 29, 2015, 08:50:20 PM |
|
how many KHC has been mined up to today?
|
|
|
|
berbip
Member
 Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
|
June 30, 2015, 07:13:05 AM |
|
I've setup a new 64-bit wallet on a new machine, is there a way to transfer my funds from my old 32 bit machine to the new one without transfer cost ?
I have a lot of small transactions in my 32bit wallet and it takes a long time to start up, would that be better in a 64 bit wallet with only a couple of transactions ?
If you just want to transfer the wallet, it can be done easily with the backup/restore wallet options. But, if you want to consolidate small transactions into a couple of addresses, you need to use the network and pay the 0.2% fee. Ok, i'll pay  it all about consolidation. will the wallet start up faster with only a couple of transactions ? |
|
|
|
|
cryptoVIP
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
June 30, 2015, 07:15:33 AM |
|
Could we have a full-funtional block exploerer?
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
June 30, 2015, 07:33:46 AM |
|
I've setup a new 64-bit wallet on a new machine, is there a way to transfer my funds from my old 32 bit machine to the new one without transfer cost ?
I have a lot of small transactions in my 32bit wallet and it takes a long time to start up, would that be better in a 64 bit wallet with only a couple of transactions ?
If you just want to transfer the wallet, it can be done easily with the backup/restore wallet options. But, if you want to consolidate small transactions into a couple of addresses, you need to use the network and pay the 0.2% fee. Ok, i'll pay it all about consolidation. will the wallet start up faster with only a couple of transactions ? Actually it depends on how many transactions you have. I recently tried this and didn't see any difference. It still starts for like 3-5 minutes on my PC even with an empty wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2015, 12:27:20 PM |
|
I've setup a new 64-bit wallet on a new machine, is there a way to transfer my funds from my old 32 bit machine to the new one without transfer cost ?
I have a lot of small transactions in my 32bit wallet and it takes a long time to start up, would that be better in a 64 bit wallet with only a couple of transactions ?
If you just want to transfer the wallet, it can be done easily with the backup/restore wallet options. But, if you want to consolidate small transactions into a couple of addresses, you need to use the network and pay the 0.2% fee. Ok, i'll pay it all about consolidation. will the wallet start up faster with only a couple of transactions ? Actually it depends on how many transactions you have. I recently tried this and didn't see any difference. It still starts for like 3-5 minutes on my PC even with an empty wallet. The size of the blockchain is what slows down the wallet startup. Wallets checks the integrity of the blockchain and that is taking 3 - 5 minutes depending on your PC. |
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2015, 12:29:09 PM |
|
Could we have a full-funtional block exploerer?
We do have a new explorer but, I need to fix a bug that makes it stop responding after a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2015, 12:41:35 PM |
|
how many KHC has been mined up to today?
At block 92,000, the guesstimate is around 10.8 Millions KHCs But, comparing KHC with BTC: 1 BTC = 100,000,000 satoshis
1 KHC = 100,000 kryptoha-toshis At block 92,000, Bitcoin on its second year had around 460,000,000,000,000 (460 Trillion) satoshis in circulation while, KHC only has today around 1,080,000,000,000 (1.08 Trillion) kryptoha-toshis in circulation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
June 30, 2015, 07:22:18 PM |
|
Surprisingly, today my miner worked through the day without freezes. Let's see if the problem appears again.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoVIP
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
July 01, 2015, 01:42:42 PM |
|
Could we have a full-funtional block exploerer?
We do have a new explorer but, I need to fix a bug that makes it stop responding after a while. Yes,no responding wastes my power fee. |
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 01, 2015, 04:02:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 09, 2015, 04:39:46 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2015, 02:25:06 PM by wr104 |
|
I just tested the new AMD 15.7 official drivers on my 290x and the KH/s dropped by 5%.
I also noticed that the --cl-opt-disable switch that I added to cgminer-khc no longer makes a difference with these new drivers.
Edit: Actually, the performance is the same. I forgot to re-adjust the Power Limit setting in the AMD Catalyst Control Center after I upgraded the drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
berbip
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
|
July 11, 2015, 02:04:21 PM |
|
I just tested the new AMD 15.7 official drivers on my 290x and the KH/s dropped by 5%.
I also noticed that the --cl-opt-disable switch that I added to cgminer-khc no longer makes a difference with these new drivers.
Edit: Actually, the performance is the same. I forgot to re-adjust the Power Limit setting in the AMD Catalyst Control Center after I upgraded the drivers.
I use the r9 280x and for me cl opt disable still makes a noticeable difference, using the 15.7 windows 10 drivers |
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 11, 2015, 03:35:30 PM
Last edit: July 11, 2015, 04:35:18 PM by wr104 |
|
I just tested the new AMD 15.7 official drivers on my 290x and the KH/s dropped by 5%.
I also noticed that the --cl-opt-disable switch that I added to cgminer-khc no longer makes a difference with these new drivers.
Edit: Actually, the performance is the same. I forgot to re-adjust the Power Limit setting in the AMD Catalyst Control Center after I upgraded the drivers.
I use the r9 280x and for me cl opt disable still makes a noticeable difference, using the 15.7 windows 10 drivers You're correct sir. I forgot that cgminer-khc has to re-compile the OpenCL kernel after removing the --cl-opt-disable switch. Doh! But, I'm back to the 14.12 drivers because, I was having stability problems with the 15.7 drivers. |
|
|
|
|
xSpas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 11, 2015, 11:52:06 PM |
|
I've installed the wallet + setup the .conf file but when I start cgminer i get this. https://i.imgur.com/gd8zB1b.pngAny help? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2015, 12:55:44 AM
Last edit: July 12, 2015, 12:26:07 PM by wr104 |
|
I've installed the wallet + setup the .conf file but when I start cgminer i get this.  Any help? Thanks. Be sure you are editing the kryptohash.conf in the right location. If you didn't pick a custom directory the first time you executed kryptohash-qt.exe, Windows places all the files in C:\Users\{YourUserName}\AppData\Roaming\Kryptohash\ Edit the kryptohash.conf file and ensure you to have these lines: server=1 rpcuser={myRPCusername} rpcpassword={myRPCpassword} rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 Then, restart the wallet. Create a solo.bat file inside the cgminer-khc folder and add these lines: setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 cgminer --kryptohash --cl-opt-disable -o http://127.0.0.1:38912 -u {myRPCusername} -p {myRPCpassword} --shaders {Num_shaders_in_my_GPU} --shaders-mul 8 --expiry 10 Edit: That error could also happen if the Wallet is still synchronizing with the network. Try the 'getwork' command from the Wallet's Debug console to confirm. |
|
|
|
|
|
tranzactionezlive
|
|
July 16, 2015, 04:04:52 AM |
|
how does nvidia compare with ati in mining KHC ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 16, 2015, 01:40:55 PM |
|
how does nvidia compare with ati in mining KHC ?
For KHC mining, AMD GPUs are 4 to 5 times faster than nVidia GPUs. This is because the KShake320 algorithm is Hash-based and requires only Integer Arithmetic and Logic operations. The algorithm benefits from the high number of ALUs provided by the AMD architecture. nVidia architecture on the other hand, is much stronger on the Floating Point calculations but, the KShake320 algorithm does not use the FPU. |
|
|
|
|
|
happyaltminer
|
|
July 28, 2015, 09:33:04 AM |
|
how does nvidia compare with ati in mining KHC ?
For KHC mining, AMD GPUs are 4 to 5 times faster than nVidia GPUs. This is because the KShake320 algorithm is Hash-based and requires only Integer Arithmetic and Logic operations. The algorithm benefits from the high number of ALUs provided by the AMD architecture. nVidia architecture on the other hand, is much stronger on the Floating Point calculations but, the KShake320 algorithm does not use the FPU. Good ,I love this GPU algo. |
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2015, 12:05:36 AM |
|
New Wallet version 0.6.2 available.Changes since 0.6.1 - Fixed an issue that could cause the PID algorithm to calculate the wrong difficulty, if an old block arrived out of order. - Added checkpoint for block 100,000 - Updated OpenSSL to version 1.0.1p for Windows binaries. Download from GitHub: https://github.com/kryptohash/kryptohash/releases
|
|
|
|
|
|
