SpanishSoldier (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2015, 09:15:29 PM |
|
Where do you come up with these lists? For example...
Basically, because I've got an AMHash sig and criticised a cloud mining ponzi he invested in, everybody else who criticised the ponzis became a sockpuppet for AM - those Chinese scammers led by Havelock/Friedcat that are running the real ponzi. In other words, he's stark raving bonkers. Below is a conversation between you and your best friend, which states more about u... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Does lowest up-front cost and no maintenance fees sound to good to be true? Does the cloud mining service try to hide their maintenance and trade fees until you've already bought a contract? Does it refuse to provide proof that they even have any miners? Are you concerned that the cloud mining service is actually a ponzi? Well, now you can get cloud mining direct from ASICMiner, one of the earliest manufacturers of Bitcoin ASICs. There's no question about these guys actually having miners and they provide all the information you need to make an informed decision. Cost: 1.2 mBTC per Gh/s Maintenance fees: $0.00163 per Gh/s per day Trading fees: 0.4% when selling Official Forum ThreadPurchase from HavelockMabsark wants you to buy this, because he is getting desperate about his Asicminer shares. But the offer is soo tempting that by his own words: I don't own any AMHash shares. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) That said, I will agree that Amhash is far preferable over all the mining ponzi's like cloudmining.website, cloudminr.io, gaw, etc. Its arguably the least-worst cloud mining offer on the market. I still wouldnt chose it over coins in a cold wallet.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2015, 01:26:43 AM |
|
Canaryinthemine YET AGAIN has another abusive user on his trust list, allowing them to use the default trust as a weapon to silence their opposition. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935984.0REMOVE NUBBINS FROM YOUR DEFAULT TRUST LIST. If this isn't default trust abuse, I don't know what is.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 09, 2015, 12:58:58 AM |
|
Canaryinthemine YET AGAIN has another abusive user on his trust list, allowing them to use the default trust as a weapon to silence their opposition. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935984.0REMOVE NUBBINS FROM YOUR DEFAULT TRUST LIST. If this isn't default trust abuse, I don't know what is. Some are more equal than others. Nubbins has removed his abusive rating temporarily to preserve his position on the default trust. Shockingly after he has demonstrated he is again willing to abuse the default trust to punish people for critical words spoken out against him to attempt to intimidate people into silence, Canaryinthemine as well as staff are COMPLETELY SILENT on the issue. Why is is that the abuses of some members are condoned while other members are removed immediately with the cooperation of staff? I wonder.
|
|
|
|
|
arallmuus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1421
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 10, 2015, 09:51:26 AM |
|
it pretty much isnt Canaryinthemine sole fault he just needs to put in some effort to clear off his trust list which i believe he put them in their trust list from his previous group buy
|
R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | │ | CRYPTO FUTURES | | | | | | | │ | 1,000x LEVERAGE | │ | COMPETITIVE FEES | │ | INSTANT EXECUTION | │ | . TRADE NOW |
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 10, 2015, 01:49:29 PM |
|
it pretty much isnt Canaryinthemine sole fault he just needs to put in some effort to clear off his trust list which i believe he put them in their trust list from his previous group buy Yet he is refusing to do this. Nubbins is on his trust list and he has left me negative trust in an attempt to intimidate myself and others into not speaking out against his abusive behavior. He changed it to a neutral, but once Canaryinthemine said he was ignoring the thread he replaced it yet again with another similar negative rating demonstrating clearly he has no respect for the position on the default trust and will abuse it to serve his personal interests. Yet again, Canaryinthemine has no response to this. He is going beyond negligence and is now actively allowing multiple default trust abusers to stay on his trust list. This has been a regular pattern of behavior for Canaryinthemine.
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2015, 06:30:16 AM |
|
I must say at least the good part of people going ape shit and having a meltdown on this forum because of their own action is that it can be funny/entertaining.
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2015, 10:40:12 PM |
|
I must say at least the good part of people going ape shit and having a meltdown on this forum because of their own action is that it can be funny/entertaining.
At least you can admit your constant harassment of users is not about "scambusting" but is about your own entertainment and gratification.
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 15, 2015, 02:51:27 AM |
|
I must say at least the good part of people going ape shit and having a meltdown on this forum because of their own action is that it can be funny/entertaining.
At least you can admit your constant harassment of users is not about "scambusting" but is about your own entertainment and gratification. Lol nice try buddy. Don't read between the lines too much. If I see someone being dishonest I will call them out. If it ends up being entertaining that is just a byproduct. it is funny to me because you can't seem to see how ridiculous you have been in the past few months since you were removed from the default trust list. If people want to make fools of themselves that ain't no one's fault but their own. Don't make it my problem they are humiliated by own actions. Laughing ain't wrong. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) FYI I have not harassed anyone here. If so I think I would have been permabanned long ago.
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 12:00:39 AM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ?
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFr34k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 01:49:16 AM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ? Well for starters, it is 100% certain that FC should be removed from CITM's list. Period. I would say that CITM was effectively endorsing FC and ASICminer via his group buys so he should at least partially be held accountable for what happened, he probably shouldn't have to repay ~$1 million+ in stolen property but this should be a very black mark on his reputation.
|
|
|
|
ScryptAsic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 05:35:16 AM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ? Well for starters, it is 100% certain that FC should be removed from CITM's list. Period. I would say that CITM was effectively endorsing FC and ASICminer via his group buys so he should at least partially be held accountable for what happened, he probably shouldn't have to repay ~$1 million+ in stolen property but this should be a very black mark on his reputation. I agree on the removal of FriedCat from anyone's lists until whatever is going on gets cleared up. I am lost on how he is to blame for that company being scammers though? He can not help that they did any of this.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFr34k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 05:46:12 AM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ? Well for starters, it is 100% certain that FC should be removed from CITM's list. Period. I would say that CITM was effectively endorsing FC and ASICminer via his group buys so he should at least partially be held accountable for what happened, he probably shouldn't have to repay ~$1 million+ in stolen property but this should be a very black mark on his reputation. I agree on the removal of FriedCat from anyone's lists until whatever is going on gets cleared up. I am lost on how he is to blame for that company being scammers though? He can not help that they did any of this. Many members on Canary's trust list had given FC positive trust. Canary also was effectively endorsing FC when he was selling his miners and effectively said that he was going to send first for products being purchased with his customers money.
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 10:41:34 AM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ? Well for starters, it is 100% certain that FC should be removed from CITM's list. Period. I would say that CITM was effectively endorsing FC and ASICminer via his group buys so he should at least partially be held accountable for what happened, he probably shouldn't have to repay ~$1 million+ in stolen property but this should be a very black mark on his reputation. I agree on the removal of FriedCat from anyone's lists until whatever is going on gets cleared up. I am lost on how he is to blame for that company being scammers though? He can not help that they did any of this. Many members on Canary's trust list had given FC positive trust. Canary also was effectively endorsing FC when he was selling his miners and effectively said that he was going to send first for products being purchased with his customers money. It seems FC has been added under dserrano5's trust list now !!!
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 03:51:26 PM |
|
FC is also in PsychoticBoy and KWH.
-MZ
|
|
|
|
KWH
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 05:53:36 PM |
|
FC is also in PsychoticBoy and KWH.
-MZ
Did you not see the ~ (strikethrough) before the name?
|
When the subject of buying BTC with Paypal comes up, I often remember this:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
|
|
|
erwin45hacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 07:26:02 PM |
|
Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ? the lost of FC or any malicious thing done by FC isnt the fault of CITM, CITM could remove him from his list , infact, CITM should do some task to sort out his trust list
|
|
|
|
BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1128
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 08:52:02 PM |
|
Funny thing is, CITM doesn't show up in my trust network due to people in my trust list excluding him being > the people who include him.
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 09:00:03 PM |
|
Funny thing is, CITM doesn't show up in my trust network due to people in my trust list excluding him being > the people who include him.
Is that done on quantity or collective power of those people?
|
|
|
|
BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1128
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2015, 09:03:23 PM |
|
Both, if by power you mean level in your trust list (higher in your trust list tree will be more effective at exclusions). Exclusions must also be > inclusions.
|
|
|
|
|